Democrats' Electoral Triumph in Virginia: Harbinger of Totalitarianism, By Charles Taylor (Florida)
In the wake of Virginia's November 4, 2025, elections, a seismic shift has reshaped the state's political landscape, delivering Democrats a resounding "blue wave." Former U.S. Rep. Abigail Spanberger became the commonwealth's first female governor, defeating Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears in a landslide attributed to backlash against federal layoffs and tariffs under President Donald Trump's second term. State Sen. Ghazala Hashmi secured the lieutenant governorship, marking her as the nation's first Muslim woman in statewide office. And in a race laced with controversy, former Del. Jay Jones ousted incumbent Attorney General Jason Miyares, clinching a six-point victory despite resurfaced texts from 2022 where he fantasised about shooting then-House Speaker Todd Gilbert "two bullets to the head" alongside Hitler and Pol Pot. Democrats also expanded their House of Delegates majority from 51-49 to at least 64-36, solidifying control amid a national redistricting skirmish.
This sweep, framed by critics as evidence of the Democratic Party's descent into totalitarianism, evokes stark historical parallels to Europe's interwar authoritarianism. As a provocative op-ed contends, today's liberals, from race-baiting to institutional capture, mirror the Nazis' playbook of deceit and subversion, amplified by modern media dominance and ideological fervour. Yet, such analogies, while rhetorically potent, demand dissection: Do Jones's vitriolic texts and the party's embrace of him signal a Weimar-style erosion of norms, or are they hyperbolic distortions of a politics? Here I probe the substance of these claims, weighing Virginia's results against historical precedents and contemporary realities. I argue that while Democratic tactics raise legitimate alarms about polarisation and accountability, but equating them to Nazism trivialises genocide and obscures the unique threats of our fractured republic.
Virginia's 2025 contests transcended state lines, serving as a midterm mood ring for Trump's turbulent tenure. Spanberger's triumph, her widest Democratic gubernatorial margin since 1961, capitalised on suburban fury over the Department of Government Efficiency's (DOGE) mass federal workforce cuts, led by Elon Musk, which hammered Northern Virginia's economy. Hashmi's win broke barriers, underscoring Democrats' appeal to diverse coalitions in a state once a GOP stronghold. But it was Jones's ascent that ignited the totalitarian firestorm.
Jones, a 36-year-old Norfolk native and descendant of enslaved people, overcame a late-October bombshell: leaked 2022 texts to GOP Del. Carrie Coyner, where he quipped that Gilbert deserved both bullets in a hypothetical lineup with history's worst tyrants, even wishing death on the lawmaker's children. Republicans, including Trump via tele-rally, branded it "disqualifying," with police groups like the Virginia Police Benevolent Association refusing endorsement and calling for his withdrawal. Yet, Virginia Democrats, from Sens. Louise Lucas and Mamie Locke, condemned the rhetoric as "disturbing" but pivoted to the "stakes of the election," crediting Jones's "character and compassion." He apologised, framing it as private venting from his non-legislative days, and surged to 52.9% of the vote.
This forgiveness, critics argue, exemplifies Democratic contempt for norms, a "wink" at violence echoing the Brownshirts' street-level intimidation. Jones's inexperience (brief stints as a delegate and assistant AG) and prior reckless driving conviction only amplify the charge: How does a figure with such a "hate-filled record" helm law enforcement? In a broader lens, the sweep bolsters claims of institutional subversion: Democrats now command the governorship, both chambers, and key offices, poised to redraw congressional maps and shield progressive priorities like sanctuary policies amid Trump's deportation push.
The op-ed's historian-author, invoking family flight from Nazis, draws deliberate parallels: Democrats' "deceit, manipulation, and contempt for constitutional limits" mimic the NSDAP's Weimar infiltration. Unlike Hitler, who peaked at 37% in 1932, Democrats command 50%+ loyalty from educated women, Black voters, and immigrants, ideological zealots unburdened by economic despair. Tactics cited include inciting riots against deportations (e.g., 2025 protests blocking ICE operations), "erasing gender distinctions" via trans policies, and "promoting mutilation" of minors, framed as cultural Gleichschaltung.
Historical analyses partially validate selective echoes. Dinesh D'Souza's The Big Lie (2017) posits Nazi economics (state intervention, welfare for "nationals") as Leftist kin, with Democrats inheriting fascist anti-capitalism. Donald Trump Jr. echoed this in 2018, cherry-picking the 1920 Nazi platform's calls for profit-sharing and land reform as "awfully similar" to Democratic planks. Rep. Allen West (2011) likened Democratic "propaganda" to Goebbels, a trope revived in 2025 amid media bias accusations.
Yet, experts dismantle these as distortions. PolitiFact rated Trump Jr.'s claim "Mostly False": Only three of 25 Nazi points vaguely align (e.g., education expansion). Historian Peter Hayes notes Nazis served racism, not equity; Democrats, while flawed on identity politics, champion civil rights antithetical to Nuremberg Laws.
A balanced conservatism demands reciprocity: Call out Jones's rhetoric without Godwin's Law overreach. Historical fidelity requires distinguishing subversion from sedition, Democrats subvert via policy (e.g., DEI mandates), but Nazis via coup.
Virginia's Democratic deluge validates unease: Electing a violence-endorsing AG amid institutional capture signals eroded accountability, a totalitarian whisper in democracy's din. Yet, Nazi analogies, peddled by D'Souza et al. betray history, conflating policy zeal with exterminationist ideology.
Comments