Dangers of the Covid PCR Test By Brian Simpson
This is not much discussed now with RAT tests available, but the PCR test for Covid has its dangers. As detailed below, the way it is generally used with a large number of cycles, generates false positives. The CDC said that the PCR test cannot distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 and the influenza virus.
Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, also denounced its use as an unreliable diagnostic tool. “If you can amplify one single molecule up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there’s just very few molecules that you don’t have. That could be thought of as a misuse of it, just to claim that it’s meaningful,” said Mullis. “It doesn’t tell you that you’re sick. It doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you or anything like that.”
Worse, the test itself has injured individuals, such as one person who had their blood-brain barrier pierced by the swab, leading to stroke-like conditions from ethylene oxide poisoning.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-04-21-victims-share-injuries-from-covid-pcr-test.html
“The sample collection procedure for the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, which is used to determine if someone is infected with the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), has caused injuries to individuals subjected to it. The COVID Blog outlined two such incidents in the U.S. and Canada.
The daughter of Ontario mother Kaylin Young was among those who suffered injuries while undergoing the procedure. Young posted a picture of her five-year-old daughter bleeding out of her nose and eyes. The bleeding occurred for 30 minutes, stopped for a short while and then started again.
According to the mother from Casselman, Eastern Ontario, her daughter was subjected to a PCR test as a requirement to attend in-person classes. She added that the Eastern Ontario Health Unit gave three requirements for five-year-old children. They can either get the PCR test for COVID, isolate for 10 days or prove that whatever illness they have is not COVID-related.
“The health unit says this is normal and to monitor it. They said they may have hit a nerve,” Young pointed out in a now-deleted Facebook post.
“How is this normal? How are you going to downplay the fact [that] you did this to my child? I expect the nurses doing these tests to be experienced and do these tests properly, not traumatize my child and possibly damage a nerve.”
Forty-year-old Angel Eisenmann of Tulsa, Oklahoma, meanwhile, suffered serious injuries from getting swabbed. The hospice worker and mother of three went to get tested on September 11, 2020.
Eisenmann reported seizures, small tremors and facial paralysis after being swabbed. While doctors initially misdiagnosed her as having a stroke, a broken blood-brain barrier following the swab was eventually found to be the cause of her health issues.
“I’m a victim of PCR COVID testing as a healthcare worker that went too far on Sept. 11, 2020. [I] broke my blood-brain barrier [and] ethylene oxide poisoning hit my central nervous system that collapsed,” she tweeted on April 13.
PCR test for COVID is flawed to begin with
Laboratory staff conducts PCR tests by first obtaining DNA samples from the nose by means of inserting long cotton swabs in each nostril. The collected nasal swab samples are then sent to a laboratory for processing. Samples that return cycle threshold (CT) values within a certain range are then deemed to be from COVID-positive individuals while those that return CT values under the range are deemed COVID-negative.
From 2020 until 2021, the PCR test was considered the “gold standard” for COVID-19 testing. But a July 2021 update from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) admitted the flawed nature of the test, citing its inability to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 and the influenza virus. (Related: CDC, WHO admit RT-PCR tests ineffective in detecting COVID-19 virus.)
The July 2021 update from the CDC said it would withdraw the request for the PCR test’s emergency use authorization filed with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) after December 31 of that year. “CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives,” it said.
“CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season.”
Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, also denounced its use as an unreliable diagnostic tool.
“If you can amplify one single molecule up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there’s just very few molecules that you don’t have. That could be thought of as a misuse of it, just to claim that it’s meaningful,” said Mullis, who died in 2019. “It doesn’t tell you that you’re sick. It doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you or anything like that.”
https://newstarget.com/2022-02-23-rt-pcr-tests-ineffective-in-detecting-covid.html
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, December 29, 2021
What this implies is that both the CDC and the WHO have formally acknowledged the failures of the RT-PCR test, without however implementing a shift in the methodology of detecting and identifying SARS-CoV-2.
The Mainstream Media Now Reluctantly Acknowledges that the PCR Test is Flawed
After having sustained the propaganda campaign, the mainstream media has now tacitly acknowledged that the PCR TEST IS INVALID.
Below is an excerpt from London’s Daily Mail on something which has been known and documented by scientists and the independent media from the outset of the corona crisis in January 2020. The report is a convoluted. It is an obvious understatement:
“Did flawed PCR tests convince us Covid was worse than it really was? …
It has been one of the most enduring Covid conspiracy theories: that the ‘gold standard’ PCR tests used to diagnose the virus were picking up people who weren’t actually infected.
Some even suggested the swabs, which have been carried out more than 200 million times in the UK alone, may mistake common colds and flu for corona.
If either, or both, were true, it would mean many of these cases should never have been counted in the daily tally – that the ominous and all-too-familiar figure, which was used to inform decisions on lockdowns and other pandemic measures, was an over-count. (Daily Mail, March 12, 2022, emphasis added)
It is carefully worded with a view to protecting the decision-makers.
The PCR Test is the Smoking Gun. There is No Pandemic
We are not dealing with mistakes as suggested by the above media report.
If the PCR test is invalid and meaningless, this means that there is no such thing as a “Covid-19 Confirmed Case”
The results of the PCR test routinely tabulated by WHO have been used to justify the lockdown policies imposed on more than 190 member states of the United Nations.
Economic and social chaos has been triggered Worldwide, and these actions adopted by corrupt governments in the course of the last two years are of criminal nature. They are not mistakes.
And if there is no Pandemic, there is no need for a vaccine.
The Covid-19 mRNA “Vaccine” is the BIGGEST FRAUD IN MEDICAL HISTORY.”
Comments