Cultural Replacement Theory, By Brandon Smith

Note: this article dates back to late 2024, mentioning the Biden regime as the power of the day, but the main critique of immigration still holds, certainly for Europe. It is one more good piece worth saving from the memory hole:

There are some very famous portrayals of immigration disasters in Hollywood films. Perhaps one of the most well-known is in the movie Children Of Men (based on the novel of the same name), which depicts a world in chaos in 2027 after the spread of a mysterious epidemic that ends all human fertility. Without children the future of the species comes into question, society falls into disarray, migrant hordes shift across borders at will and governments turn to authoritarian measures.

Beyond the predictive programming, this is where we find the progressive stamp on any and all depictions of mass migration. The migrants are always poor, innocent and downtrodden minority victims, while anyone against the unchecked invasion of unvetted and disparate cultures is portrayed as a fascist (and usually white) villain. They should never have tried to enter a nation illegally in the first place, but removing them from that country is always painted as an act akin to genocide.

The expulsion of unwanted or destructive groups of people has been an emergency measure used by numerous civilizations for thousands of years. The cultures that don't protect their gates end up being erased or absorbed into a completely different population that may not hold the same values and principles. The majority of nations on the planet today have strict immigration rules, yet, America and the EU are the only regions attacked for wanting to limit the flow of illegals.

Why is that?

The open borders propaganda common to Hollywood movies is part of a larger establishment agenda that has been active for many years in the U.S. but is now accelerating since 2021. The Biden administration in particular has overseen the largest spike in illegal migration in U.S. history, with over 300,000 border violations in December alone (that we know of). To put this in perspective, that's the equivalent of a city the size of Pittsburgh moving across the U.S. border and demanding welfare, subsidies, housing, jobs, free food, etc., every single month.

This is unsustainable and the establishment knows it. The Biden administration has actively tried to hide the crisis from the view of the American people for years, constantly denying that there is any threat and claiming that the border is more secure now than ever before. Anyone who questions the validity of this claim is immediately accused of racism, white supremacy and conspiracy theory.

Border states have become so angered over leftist denials that they have started busing thousands of migrants into blue "sanctuary cities" like New York, Washington D.C. and Chicago. The result has been a calamity for their welfare programs and local economy. Even progressive voters in these areas are openly enraged by the flood of migrants into their neighborhoods.

Schools in New York are being emptied and shut down to make room for migrant housing. Homeless shelters in D.C. have been inundated with migrants begging for handouts and the citizen homeless had far less food over the holidays because the illegals are eating it all. The Chicago O'Hare Airport is being turned into a migrant shelter and the city is trying to prevent the media from documenting the situation.

Democrat mayors are finally calling the event a national emergency. Funny how they refused to admit to the problem until they were directly affected by the problem. But, of course, they blame conservative governors instead of their own open border and sanctuary city policies. In other words, Democrats are indignant because they are being forced by red states to suffer the consequences of their insane political ideals.

And though low-level progressive politicians are made to look foolish in their continued defense of sanctuary status, there is the greater issue of engineered crisis. Why have establishment elites and the Biden administration been lying despite the clear and present danger? And why is it considered particularly wrong for Western civilizations to defend their borders? Because certain groups of people within the centers of power benefit greatly from the continued migrant invasion.

We've all heard of the Cloward-Piven Strategy by now, and it's not all that difficult to understand. Create a problem by using migrants as a weapon, get the public to react in fear and desperation so they will beg for your help, offer a "solution" to the migrant problem that will give you more power than you had before, or, allow the invasion to collapse the existing society and then rebuild the system your way from the ashes.

But Cloward-Piven is almost too simplistic an explanation of what is happening; it doesn't really define the bigger picture. There are a few ways that this strategy could open the door to authoritarianism in the U.S. Let's war game these scenarios to better comprehend why...

Operation Garden Plot and Martial Law

In 1968 the U.S. Army at the request of the government drafted a civil disturbance plan called "Operation Garden Plot" which outlined what was essentially a martial law response to large-scale social breakdown. One of the primary factors listed in the plan as a trigger for martial law was the uncontrolled mass migration of minorities into the U.S., as well as riots by minorities in light of economic uncertainty.

Garden Plot has provisions designed to install a long-lasting domestic military presence in the U.S. if deemed necessary, and was even tied to programs like REX 84 which planned out the installation of "FEMA camps" or detention facilities meant to hold large numbers of refugees during a mass migration crisis. These programs were accidentally exposed during the Iran/Contra hearings of 1987 and were kept secret from a majority of representatives in Congress.

In other words, establishment elites designed a set of operations to swiftly impose martial law if a migrant disaster occurred. But were these measures meant to solve the crisis, or merely use the crisis as an excuse to put boots on the ground in the U.S. and permanently end whatever constitutional protections we have left? That is to say, it benefits their agenda to keep the borders open until the illegals overwhelm the system, which is happening right now.

Amnesty And Creating an Illegal Immigrant Military

Democrats have fielded multiple bills including legislation in 2022 to give illegal immigrants the option to serve in the U.S. military and gain citizenship as a reward. Representatives mention the growing shortfall in military recruitment as a rationale for the policy (a shortfall that they created after allowing woke cultism into the armed forces curriculum).

I have mentioned this in previous articles and I continue to believe that one of the main purposes for the establishment to leave borders open and entice illegals to enter is to create a migrant army; a situation in which millions of illegals will be offered easy citizenship in exchange for service. I also believe that this migrant army will be used against the American public (the real citizenry) to impose martial law measures in the wake of a national disaster.

Look at it this way: With the current military around 70 percent conservative and independent, it is far less likely that the armed forces will follow orders to subjugate the populace, especially in the name of an increasingly unpopular leftist/globalist president … It is much easier for the elites to use foreigners with no inherent respect for American culture or the American people as a suppressive force.:

Cultural Replacement Theory

"Replacement Theory" is often denigrated by the media as a racist conspiracy held by white people who are "afraid to lose power." This is nonsensical for several reasons, including the fact that if "white people" were a monolith and we had all the power, then we would simply snuff out any threats to that power and lock down our borders. And, there would be nothing anyone could do to stop us.

The truth is, there is no white monolith, there is no patriarchy and there is no such thing as systemic racism. Do some leftist activists clamor for mass migration to replace white people in the U.S. and Europe? Absolutely. They call it "decolonization." Is this the real purpose of mass migration? Probably not.

The replacement going on is not so much about white people as it is about Western culture. The goal, I believe, is to open the floodgates to foreign elements because most of them come from more socialist systems that have no understanding of individual freedom. In this way, the establishment can dilute the American culture of independence and use the tyranny of the majority (democracy) to erase our values and principles forever.

This is why you will hear Biden and his ilk constantly pontificate on "democracy" and the "defense of democracy' and the conservative "threat to democracy." This is very deliberate terminology. When they say "democracy", they are talking about the rule of the mob; the tyranny of the majority. They are talking about collectivism, socialism and ultimately authoritarianism for the "sake of the greater good."

Migrants are being used to phase out the pillars of Western civilization. This is why the borders must be secured now and illegals must be kicked out of the country with haste. No martial law, no FEMA detention facilities, no amnesty, no asylum, no welfare and no subsidies. They just need to be removed and sent back to where they came from and if they return illegally they should be severely punished.

This is not a movie. This is not Children Of Men. Being against illegal immigration is purely rational and reasonable.