Covid King Dr Fauci on Menstrual Cycles and the Vaxxes By Mrs Vera West
Dr Anthony Fauci has recently said that while menstrual irregularities exist, it is “quite transient and temporary,” and “[w]e need to study it more.” But Fauci was criticised by a number of gynaecologists, such as Dr. Christiane Northrup, a former fellow in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. She told The Epoch Times: “Unfortunately, the menstrual problems we are seeing are far from transient and temporary. … Many women have been bleeding daily or having heavy, irregular, painful periods for an entire year. And some of these are well past menopause. Something is way off here.” According to Dr James Thorpe, a maternal-foetal medicine expert, compared to the flu vaccines, the Covid-129 vaxxes have these risks:
“Abnormal uterine bleeding (menstrual irregularity), 1,000 times greater than for influenza vaccines
- Miscarriages, 50 times greater
- Fetal chromosomal abnormalities, 100 times greater
- Fetal malformation, 50 times greater
- Fetal cystic hygroma (a major malformation), 90 times greater
- Fetal cardiac disorders, 40 times greater
- Fetal arrhythmia, 50 times greater
- Fetal cardiac arrest, 200 times greater
- Fetal vascular malperfusion, 100 times greater
- Fetal growth abnormalities, 40 times greater
- Fetal abnormal surveillance tests, 20 times greater
- Fetal placental thrombosis, 70 times greater.”
Clearly there is a mounting human reproductive disaster waiting here. If the goal is depopulation, then it looks like the vaxxes are a raging success!
“Dr. Anthony Fauci’s recent comments on menstrual irregularities have met with serious rebuttal from gynecologists, who say the COVID-19 vaccines shouldn’t have been administered without adequate safety testing, especially on pregnant women.
“The menstrual thing is something that seems to be quite transient and temporary,” Fauci told Fox News on July 25, when asked about the effect of the vaccines on menstrual cycles.
“We need to study it more.”
Fauci is director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and has been a frontman for COVID vaccine information in the United States.
But Dr. Christiane Northrup, a former fellow in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, disagrees with Fauci.
“Unfortunately, the menstrual problems we are seeing are far from transient and temporary,” she told The Epoch Times. “Many women have been bleeding daily or having heavy, irregular, painful periods for an entire year.
“And some of these are well past menopause. Something is way off here.”
Other experts also weighed in.
Dr. James Thorp, an extensively published, board-certified physician in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as maternal and fetal medicine, told The Epoch Times: “The significant and dramatic changes in menstrual patterns occurring after COVID-19 vaccines should not be marginalized. It is indicative of major adverse effects on women of reproductive age.
“The stakeholders claimed that the vaccine would remain at the injection site in the deltoid muscle. This was misinformation.
“The lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are now known to be distributed throughout the entire body and to be concentrated in the ovaries, according to at least two studies.” A lipid nanoparticle is an extremely small particle, a fat-soluble membrane that is the cargo of the messenger RNA (mRNA).
Pfizer’s Internal Documents
Pfizer’s internal documents, obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request, show a 118-fold increase in the concentration of LNPs from the time of vaccine injection to 48 hours.
“The LNPs are known to include toxic substances including polyethylene glycol and pseudouridinated mRNA,” Thorp said. “The limited number of ovum in the ovaries (about 1 million) are exposed to potentially toxic substances and could potentially have catastrophic effects on human reproduction.”
“The stakeholders claimed that the pseudouridinated mRNA couldn’t be reverse transcribed into the human DNA. This was misinformation,” he added, referring to a Swedish study published in February, which concluded that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine is able to enter human liver cells and is converted into DNA.
Thorp, who has been practicing obstetrics for more than 42 years, believes that the medical industrial complex had unequivocal evidence on the vaccine’s danger to pregnant women.
“This is proven not only by VAERS, but also by Pfizer’s own internal document, ‘Pfizer 5.3.6 Postmarketing Experience,’” Thorp said. VAERS stands for Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, a program run by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration.
The data show that within the first 90 days of trials, there were 1,223 deaths, multiple severe adverse effects, and a 45 percent complication rate in pregnancy cases (274) that occurred in vaccinated mothers (124).
In a 2012 study, Thorp says, researchers found “a high local accumulation of nanoparticles, nanocapsules, and nanoemulsions in specific locations of the ovaries” of the different mouse species and Wistar rats that were studied “in vivo, in vitro, and by sophisticated microscopic imaging.” The LNPs were found in all the animals.
Michael Yeadon, a former vice president at Pfizer, believes that the pharmaceutical industry “definitely knew,” since 2012, that the lipid nanoparticles would accumulate in the ovaries of women who took the vaccines.
“No one in the industry or in leading media could claim they didn’t know about these risks to successful pregnancy,” Yeadon told The Epoch Times in April.
Sidestepping Responsibility
Northrup fears there could be much more data related to reproductive damage that haven’t yet been discovered.
“The phrase ‘this requires more study,’ while downplaying the current evidence of harm, is a common way to discount the experience of thousands of women,” she said. “Unfortunately, academic doctors do this all the time as a way to sidestep responsibility for the untoward effects of their treatments.”
In a previous interview, Northrup told The Epoch Times: “The female menstrual cycle is considered a vital sign as important as blood pressure and body temperature when it comes to health assessment.
“Our initial findings of bleeding and decidual cast shedding in women who have been exposed to those who have had the experimental injection suggest that what we’ve seen so far is just the tip of the iceberg.” A decidual cast is “the sloughing off of the entire inside of the uterus all at once.”
“The reproductive effects of this shot could be far worse than we’ve been led to believe,” she said.
Research analyst Tiffany Parotto, founder and director of MyCycleStory, a survey that tracks women’s menstrual problems following COVID vaccination, told The Epoch Times in May that she was distressed about the censorship and deletion of a Facebook group of about 21,000 members in which women discussed their menstrual irregularities.
Parotto, Thorp, and Northup co-authored a peer-reviewed study on menstrual irregularities of vaccinated women, which was published in April 2022.
“New pharmacovigilance data associated with the use of the COVID-19 vaccines in women of reproductive age have prompted a group of doctors to call for a ban on the gene therapy vaccines.
Dr. James Thorp, a maternal-fetal medicine expert, analyzed and verified the most recent Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data related to COVID-19 vaccines and compared them to the influenza vaccines.
VAERS is a database in which people file reports of adverse events following vaccination. The database is managed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Thorp found that vaccines for COVID-19 “are associated with increases in menstrual disorders, miscarriage, fetal chromosomal abnormalities, fetal cystic hygroma, fetal malformations, fetal cardiac arrest, fetal cardiac arrhythmias, fetal cardiac disorders, fetal vascular malperfusion abnormalities, abnormal fetal surveillance testing, abnormal fetal growth patterns, placental thrombosis, and fetal death.”
Compared to influenza vaccines, COVID-19 shots posed the following risks:
- Abnormal uterine bleeding (menstrual irregularity), 1,000 times greater than for influenza vaccines
- Miscarriages, 50 times greater
- Fetal chromosomal abnormalities, 100 times greater
- Fetal malformation, 50 times greater
- Fetal cystic hygroma (a major malformation), 90 times greater
- Fetal cardiac disorders, 40 times greater
- Fetal arrhythmia, 50 times greater
- Fetal cardiac arrest, 200 times greater
- Fetal vascular malperfusion, 100 times greater
- Fetal growth abnormalities, 40 times greater
- Fetal abnormal surveillance tests, 20 times greater
- Fetal placental thrombosis, 70 times greater
Thorp said that he verified his analysis with a Department of Defense statistical consultant who agreed to help him on condition of anonymity.
Lack of Safety Testing
Regarding the VAERS data, vaccinologist Dr. Robert Malone, a key contributor of messenger RNA (mRNA) technology, told The Epoch Times on July 21: “The risky strategy of authorizing the emergency use of mRNA ‘vaccine’ products prior to completion of rigorous nonclinical animal testing for reproductive and genotoxicity risks, followed by advocacy of widespread use in pregnancy, now appears to have resulted in substantial and avoidable reproductive toxicity.
“Prior nonclinical [animal model] data from the Pfizer emergency use authorization [EUA] data package, together with the absence of adequate data and testing of safety during pregnancy, have resulted in avoidable reproductive and fetal toxicities.”
He stressed that expectant mothers should avoid the “experimental” COVID vaccines and that their infants shouldn’t be injected with them.
“These new VAERS data and analyses demonstrate that both reproductive-aged mothers and their infants have been damaged by accepting unlicensed, inadequately tested, emergency use authorized genetic vaccines,” Malone said.
Earlier this year, a VAERS analysis co-authored by scientist Jessica Rose was withdrawn by the academic journal Elsevier.
Rose told The Epoch Times that Thorp’s analysis aligns perfectly with hers.
“I do believe it is not only important, but necessary to pull these products from pregnant/breastfeeding women and infants since there is no long-term safety data, and the short-term data look bad,” she said.
“As per both Moderna and Pfizer’s safety documents presented to VRBPAC [Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee] pre-EUA granting for 0- to 4-year-olds, this applies. They both showed terrible risk.”
Dr. Christiane Northrup, a former fellow of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, also stands by the analysis.
“Having been on the front lines of the DES [diethylstilbestrol] disaster as a young OB-GYN, I am astounded that we are repeating the same kind of mistake but on a far more devastating level,” Northrup told The Epoch Times.
“COVID-19 shots must be stopped immediately in all pregnant women before further damage is done to the next generation.”
Thorp said that the adverse outcomes he recorded in his analysis are statistically significant.
“The probability of these adverse outcomes occurring by chance alone is less than 1 in 10,000. It was incumbent upon the COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers, the FDA, CDC, [American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists], Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology to have demanded this safety data prior to pushing these dangerous ‘vaccines’ in pregnancy,” he said.
“These institutions have violated the golden rule of pregnancy: new substances, be it nutraceuticals, drugs, or vaccines, have never been allowed in pregnancy until long-term outcome data are available.
“Now, the COVID-19 vaccines make prior obstetrical disasters of [DES] and thalidomide look like prenatal vitamins.
“I am calling for a worldwide ban and moratorium on the use of any experimental gene therapy and/or COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ in pregnancy until long-term safety data are irrefutable.”
According to OpenVAERS, “VAERS … is a voluntary reporting system that has been estimated to account for only 1% of vaccine injuries.”
It’s estimated that VAERS, a voluntary reporting system, accounts for only 1 percent of all vaccine injuries, according to the OpenVAERS project.
Both the VAERS official website and OpenVAERS feature a disclaimer stating that the reports alone can’t be used to determine whether a vaccine is actually causing or contributing to an illness or adverse event.”
Comments