Covid and Cancer: Now a Mainstream Mention, By Brian Simpson
Angus Dalgleish, an expert in immunology and Emeritus Professor of Oncology at St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, has noted that while governments, such as the UK, aggressively pushed the Covid mRNA vax with their mandates, and lockdowns, relieved only by people taking the vax to return to "normal" life, the governments were tight on compensation for vaccine injuries. First, the governments in the Anglosphere legislatively protected Big Pharma from any liability, which Big Pharma said was needed to make the manufacture of vaccines economical. This alone shows that there is something deeply wrong with the vaccine culture safety measures, since no other consumer product, such as cars and machinery, gets such protection. It is an incentive for shonky crook work. And in the UK and Australia, a very restrictive regime was put into place for awarding vaccine injury damages/compensation, which in the UK case required 60 percent disability. This means that thousands of people with lesser disabilities which still prevented work, were not compensated, and left to perish, so to speak.
It was noted by Dr Dalgleish, that now mainstream medias, such as the Daily Mail, are featuring stories about people contracting cancer from the mRNA vax. Cardiovascular issues, such as blood clots, strokes and heart attacks have been mentioned in the mainstream media, but cancer issues, not so much. The article Dr Dalgleish refers to involved rare lymphoma which was successfully treated with a bone marrow transplant. However, Dr William Makis, in his daily email newsletter, details vax-caused cancer cases almost every day. The existence of turbo charged cancers, ultra-fast-growing cancers that may be at stage 4 and terminal before even being detected, is a concern to cancer experts, but the mainstream media has not gone there yet. While the explosion of cancers in young people is mentioned, it is explained away by lifestyle factors, such a poor diet, even though, the rise in once-rare cancers, precisely coincides with the Covid mRNA rollout, and lifestyle factors were present continuously. One wonders for how long a lid can be kept on this?
"An article in the Daily Mail online about the campaign for compensation for victims of Covid vaccine injury mentions many case reports of patients who suffered severe reactions and even death after receiving a Covid vaccine. The real tragedy is that such reactions are only compensated if there is 60% disability, which means the loss of a limb or severe paralysis. This does not cover the many thousands of victims who have suffered life changing damage and are left unable to work because of vaccine damage who are not deemed eligible for compensation. As usual they have been brushed off with the usual platitudes that the benefit outweighs the 'very rare' side-effects they have suffered.
It's great that the mainstream media have at last aired this in such a large article, just when the official Covid Inquiry is due to look at the fourth component on vaccines.
Written submissions from myself and my associates to the inquiry have not been responded to and we fear they may not even be published.
Whereas the link between the vaccines and clots, heart attacks and strokes is so well known (despite still being classified as rare, though not so rare that AstraZeneca quietly withdrew its vaccine from the market), the link with cancer which I first exposed over two years ago here has assiduously been ignored.
It's therefore important that a patient who suffered first clots and then a rare lymphoma following the vaccine is highlighted by the Mail.
The good news is that it looks like it has been successfully treated with very expensive treatments including a marrow transplant.
My main issue with all this evidence is that it is actively suppressed by fellow doctors and NHS managers. I was told that I was confusing coincidence with causality and that I had to prove it without anyone agreeing to provide the resources to do so.
Since then, numerous other doctors have confirmed what I was seeing and published and presented their findings, with medics on all major continents reporting the same thing, that the main risk appears to be with the mRNA boosters by Pfizer and Moderna. This is most evident in the paper analysing the Japanese official statistics, which clearly show that cancer incidence across all cancer types rises with each booster given. The paper published in Cureus attracted the attention of industry sponsored 'fact-checkers', who bullied the Editor to retract it on spurious methodological grounds. So much for follow the science!
Nevertheless it is now evident that this trend is not a coincidence but fact, as many others have pointed out, especially James Royle, a surgeon who noted that he was seeing a marked increase in advanced aggressive tumours and at a much earlier age than normal. Again encouraged to remain silent, Royle found that his audience of fellow surgeons at a national meeting all agreed with him but had been too afraid to report it.
I still get told by fellow doctors that they are not seeing this association. I now know why. At a recent clinic I saw six patients who had all contracted rapidly progressing (turbo) cancers and wanted a second opinion. All had been seen by their GP, had surgery (by surgeons) and were on chemotherapy (by medical oncologists). Not one doctor had enquired about their vaccine history. When I did they all admitted to being bullied by their GPs to have regular boosters (just to be safe!)
This to my mind is serious medical incompetence, as all such cases deserve a detailed medical history as to possible causation, something which obviously none of these doctors did.
Not a week goes by without some contact from a colleague regarding Covid vaccines and possible cancer connection.
This week it was evidence from a legal report on a doctor being bullied into being quiet and who was labelled as mentally unhinged. The doctor told me he had reported the following:
Since the vaccines were rolled out my practice has changed, with more and more patients presenting with advanced aggressive cancers and a much younger age.
Some patients are presenting with two primaries at the same time. These cancers are much more resistant to standard treatments and more likely to recur.
Strangely, we have seen an alarming number of young women who have all had the HPV vaccine for cervical cancer present with advanced cervical cancers.
All these patients had been victims of having had a Covid booster. My reasoning is that the boosters suppress T cell responses, which are the only responses that keep you free of new infections and which control your cancers.
As an experienced vaccine developer for HIV and cancer it is a fairly common maxim that any vaccine that needs a booster does not work unless the patient is immunosuppressed.
A large number of us worldwide have been examining how the vaccines cause cancer and have concluded that, firstly, mRNA vaccines are not vaccines but gene therapy products which should never have been approved. Apart from causing T cell suppression, they also alter the antibody responses from protecting to tolerising, a perfect medium for cancer development.
In addition, all mRNA vaccine vials examined to date have unacceptably high DNA contamination, which has been confirmed four years too late by a team in an FDA lab supervised by FDA scientists.
It gets worse, large numbers of them have a SV40 sequence, which is used to induce cancer experimentally. mRNA-encoded spike protein has been shown to bind to known suppressor genes that normally protect you from getting cancer such as p53, BRCA and MSH, the later associated with the Lynch syndrome. Activating these genes will lead to the induction of more aggressive cancers at a much younger age than normal.
This is the 'small' price to pay for a vaccine that I don't believe saved lives as even 'Warp Speed' development of six to seven months is too late for a virus that changes every three months and every new wave, and it is being pushed onto people who never had any significant risk of developing serious Covid infection let alone death, unless they were over 81.
So why is this 'vaccine' being given to young adults and children?
Do not think that this is the end, even if we get this booster programme suspended.
Moderna has announced that it will soon be capable of producing 250 million vaccines a year for all known diseases including flu, norovirus, RSV and so on, using the same mRNA technology.
This is another subject that urgently needs covering given that the U.K. Government has committed piles of taxpayers' money for unproven and dangerous vaccine development.
In the meantime there is still no freedom of speech allowed for doctors who wish to 'First do no harm', and the death of science continues its downward spiral."
Comments