Covid-19, Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy, By Brian Simpson

There is a new book, Covid-19, Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy (2024), by Dr. D. Hughes a Senior Lecturer in International Relations at the University of Lincoln in the UK, who holds undergraduate and master's degrees from the University of Oxford and a Ph.D. from Duke University. The book is a free download, the link below. He is one of the few professional academics who at the time of the plandemic, and today, took a stand against the Covid agenda to create a world of technocratic enslavement and domination. His recent papers include "COVID-19 'Vaccines' for Children in the UK: A Tale of Establishment Corruption" (International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research) and "Wall Street, the Nazis, and the Crimes of the Deep State" (Propaganda in Focus).

https://www.academia.edu/86094839/What_is_in_the_so_called_COVID_19_Vaccines_Part_1_Evidence_of_a_Global_Crime_Against_Humanity

The book takes this research further, exploring the links between the military industrial complex, seeking bioweapons, and the Covid outbreak. A sample:

"Former DARPA Director Regina Dugan recalls "a pivotal moment in 2010" (the breakthrough year above), when Dan Wattendorf asked: "What if we have a global pandemic and it's a novel pathogen? That will be catastrophic. We can't wait the normal 3–10 years for a vaccine. And what if instead we could use mRNA to create a vaccine in days and weeks […]?" ("How DARPA Seeded the Ground for a Rapid Covid-19 Cure," 2020). The context for Wattendorf's question is not provided, but it is easy to imagine a DARPA brainstorming session on how to provide for injecting as many people as possible, at speed, with a revolutionary new military technology whose proof of concept had just been established. In December 2013, DARPA awarded Pfizer $7.7 million for research to "cut response times to pandemic or bioterrorism threats by eliminating several of the steps currently needed to confer immunity," though "details of the research are scarce" (Taylor, 2013).

Moderna was founded in September 2010 and operationalised in 2011. In 2012, "despite being years away from testing its science in humans," and with no scientific publications to its name, $40 million of venture capitalist funding flowed into the company (Crunchbase, n.d.), plus $240 million from AstraZeneca for the rights to mRNA drugs that did not yet exist (Garde, 2020). On October 2, 2013, DARPA awarded Moderna

$25 million of research funding (Moderna, 2013). On October 24, 2013, Moderna was named a WEF "global growth company" and heralded as "an industry leader in innovative mRNA therapeutics." In 2014, the company achieved the rare "unicorn" status (a $1 billion stock valuation for a private startup), even though it was offering a "fledgling drug technology" that had still not been tested in humans (Dolgin, 2015). None of this makes any sense from a commercial perspective, and the fingerprints of the deep state are not difficult to detect."

This goes a long way to explain how the US funded the Covid experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as China was a convenient place to conduct research that could no longer be done the US. The release of the virus could have been a double-cross by the Chinese who saw the golden opportunity to use the rope the West gave them, to hang the West. But more investigation is needed on this crucial point.

https://www.academia.edu/117687419/_Covid_19_Psychological_Operations_and_the_War_for_Technocracy_FULL_BOOK

https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/what-is-in-the-so-called-covid-19 

 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Sunday, 19 May 2024

Captcha Image