Covering Up Thousands of Covid Vax Deaths in the UK, and Elsewhere By Richard Miller (London)

The Daily Expose has conducted research that indicates that thousands of deaths caused by the Covid vaxxes have been covered up by the government and public health agencies. In particular, the fully vaccinated are facing the prospects of Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS), with the immune systems of the fully vaxxed rapidly declining. The Daily Expose’s analysis of UKHSA data, shows that all fully vaccinated individuals over the age of 30 will have lost, on average, nearly 100 percent of their immune system’s ability to fight off Covid-19 within 13 weeks of being fully vaccinated. Even if the vax did work for that time, it raises the question as to its point, since one still faces the risks of adverse vaccine effects over that time, with a declined immune system.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-02-18-uk-covering-up-thousands-covid-vaccine-deaths.html

“An investigation by the Daily Expose has found that thousands of deaths caused by the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine have been covered up in the United Kingdom by many government and public health agencies.

“Health authorities around the world are manipulating figures in an attempt to hide from the general public that the COVID-19 injections are causing the fully vaccinated to develop Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS),” the Daily Expose reported.

According to the Daily Expose, Public Health England (PHE), Public Health Scotland (PHS) and the U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA) have all been actively attempting to hide the actual number of deaths caused by the COVID-19 vaccine from members of the press who actually want to report the truth regarding this matter.

One Freedom of Information Act request released earlier this month has found that the British government has only admitted to 15 deaths in England and Wales caused by COVID-19 vaccinations. As the Daily Expose‘s investigation shows, this is wildly inaccurate.

Data from the PHE covering June 14 to 21, 2021 show that, of the 35 deaths due to COVID-19 reported that week, four were unvaccinated, seven were partially vaccinated and 24 were fully vaccinated.

Journalists from the outlet tried to contact various PHE branches as well as Members of Parliament and Health Secretary Sajid Javid for some kind of clarification regarding this data, but they did not receive a reply. PHE also refused to publish its data on COVID-related deaths for the following week, instead changing the frequency of reporting to biweekly rather than weekly.

PHS, PHE’s equivalent in Scotland, has also tried to hide data showing that the vast majority of people who tested positive for COVID-19 are fully vaccinated and boosted. According to PHS data on “PCR-confirmed COVID-19” cases by vaccine status, 11,192 unvaccinated, 3,245 partially vaccinated, 24,987 fully vaccinated and 46,951 fully vaccinated and boosted individuals tested positive for the coronavirus in the four weeks from Jan. 8 to Feb. 4.

Fully vaccinated Brits succumbing to VAIDS

The UKHSA is the main government agency responsible for “public health protection and infectious disease capability.” The agency was created in April 2021 to help combat the COVID-19 pandemic.

The agency’s data shows that the immune systems of fully vaccinated individuals are declining rapidly. According to the Daily Expose’s analysis of UKHSA data, all fully vaccinated individuals over the age of 30 will have, on average, lost nearly 100 percent of their immune system’s ability to fight off COVID-19 within 13 weeks of being fully vaccinated.

The immune systems of adults between the ages of 18 and 29 are a lot stronger, but data shows they’re still experiencing total immune system failure within 27 weeks after being fully vaccinated.

“It remains the case that the surveillance report includes rates per 100,000, which can be used to argue that vaccines are not effective,” said Office of Statistics Regulation Director-General Ed Humpherson in a tacit admission that the vaccines do not provide protection.

Humpherson insists that the UKHSA’s data does not prove that the immune systems of the fully vaccinated are deteriorating, claiming that “I know that this is not the intention of the surveillance report, but the potential for misuse remains.”

But if the COVID-19 vaccines were functioning as intended, none of the data released by the UKHSA or any other British government agency should even be able to remotely support an argument that the vaccines are ineffective.

Humpherson said that the use of UKHSA data to prove the vaccines are ineffective is “a misuse of government data.” This is an admission that all government data must be used exclusively to prove that the vaccines are effective, and any data that departs from this narrative shall be “readjusted” by his office.

“Nobody who is vaccinated with Pfizer or Moderna is fully vaccinated at all. If they were fully vaccinated, then they would not get infected with COVID, would they?” wrote the Daily Expose.

“If they were fully vaccinated, then they would not need a booster and another booster, would they? Fully vaccinated people are fully duped, fully conned and are on the way to having their genes fully corrupted and their immune systems fully compromised. The one thing they are not is fully vaccinated.”

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/17/pfizergate-world-wide-coverup-covid-vaccines-cause-vaids/

“Health authorities around the world are manipulating figures in an attempt to hide from the general public that the Covid-19 injections are causing the fully vaccinated to develop Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome; and we can prove it…

By a concerned reader

The Chairman of the South African Medical Association. Dr. Angelique Coetzee, discovered the Omicron variant in South Africa in November 2021. Being a practicing GP during a pandemic, she saw plenty of Omicron cases and deduced from these that it lead to a mild form of the flu.

The term ‘mild’ is very specific in medicine. Dr Coetzee explains what she means by the term to the German Die Welt newspaper as follows…

“I am a clinician and based on the clinical picture there are no indications that we are dealing with a very serious disease. The course is mostly mild. I’m not saying you won’t get sick if you’re mild,”

“The definition of mild COVID-19 disease is clear, and it is a [World Health Organization] definition: patients can be treated at home and oxygen or hospitalization is not required,”

“A serious illness is one in which we see acute pulmonary respiratory infections: people need oxygen, maybe even artificial respiration. We saw that with Delta—but not with Omicron. So I said to people, ‘I can’t say it like that because it’s not what we’re seeing.’”

So according to the discoverer of Omicron, the chairperson of the South African Medical Association, Omicron is a mild form of the flu which did not cause hospitalisation or require oxygen and was not an acute respiratory infection like Delta.

Of course this is not what the gene corrupting drug pushers want you to hear. So she went on to reveal that ‘European officials’ pressurized her to deny this truth.

“I was told not to publicly state that it was a mild illness. I have been asked to refrain from making such statements and to say that it is a serious illness. I declined,”

Coetzee did not specify which officials told her to keep quiet. She did say that South African officials did not try to pressure her. She claimed that she was criticized by authorities in both the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.

Dr Coetzee explains…

“What I said at one point—because I was just tired of it—was: In South Africa, this is a mild illness, but in Europe, it is a very serious one. That’s what your politicians wanted to hear.”

These things were reported in several news sources on February 10th.

South Africa was 23% fully vaccinated in November 2021. So this means that Omicron is a mild flu for the unvaccinated. It does not cause hospitalisation and does not require oxygen and does not result in acute respiratory infection like Delta. And furthermore this is being covered up by European governments.

South Africa, being in the Southern Hemisphere, is in Summer during November (our May). We know that mild flu does not send people to hospital in May in any numbers.

So it’s strange to find so many people being hospitalised in Australia, another Southern Hemisphere country, with Omicron. But not so strange when you realise that they are fully vaccinated.

The only viable explanation is that people are suffering from VAIDS in order to make it into hospital with flu during summer, and we first saw full blown VAIDS in the New South Wales (NSW) figures for Omicron cases from 2022 January 1st -8th…

The Australian Cover Up

There we saw a 2,085 to 194.4 or 10.72 to 1 case rate ratio and a 159,325 to 787 or 202.5:to 1 case ratio. In other words 99.5% of their Omicron cases were in the fully vaccinated and one half of one percent of cases were in the unvaccinated. But the minute these figures were published by the Expose on January 28th, the State Government started rigging them to cover up the vaccine generated catastrophe as follows…

https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Documents/covid-19-surveillance-report-20220113.pdf
https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Documents/covid-19-surveillance-report-20220120.pdf
https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Documents/covid-19-surveillance-report-20220201.pdf
https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Documents/covid-19-surveillance-report-20220204.pdf

The unvaxxed Omicron cases went from 2,775 on Jan1 to 3,552 on Jan8 to 4,644 on Jan15 to 72,772 on Jan22 !
Whereas the doubly vaxxed Omicron cases went from 108,056 to 267,381 to 372,912 to 438, 255.

The Jan1 report was published on Jan13, the Jan8 report on Jan20, the Jan15 report on Feb1 and the Jan22 report on Feb4. The Jan8 report says that it was published on Feb4 which is garbage because we knew its contents before Jan28 and because its URL is .20220120 or Jan20, 2022 – DOH!

So by Feb8, the government of NSW had engineered a scenario where the 202.5 to 1 case ratio between the double dosed and the undosed had fallen to 65,343 to 68,128 or 0.95 to 1. There were now more Omicron cases in the unvaxxed than in the double vaxxed, not withstanding the fact that 95% of NSW is double vaxxed! I think they overcooked that one a bit!

So in the first 2 weeks of the year you were 10x more likely to catch Omicron if you were vaxxed. But by the 3rd week, you were 20x more likely to catch it if you were unvaxxed. …

The Canadian Cover Up

The Canadian government uses a multi stage cover up. Firstly it is almost impossible to get back issues of its Epidemiological summaries. The Australians make all their back issues available as links to pdfs. Not so the Canadians. They make nothing available other the present report.

But one can use the wayback machine of web.archive.org to get them with extreme difficulty. The way back machine spends 95% of its time giving you the last report it cached and refusing to give you the next report you have asked for (even if it has that report). If you wish to spend a few millennia wrestling with a really annoying AI please visit – https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/epidemiological-summary-covid-19-cases.html

The machine is perfectly capable of failing to load a page at least 10x then loading 25% of it, then 50% of it, then 75% of it then forgetting what it has loaded and starting all over again. Better still it can give you an html page of its cases following vaccination section with the cases by vax table from one report and with the wording of the populations with various vaccination statuses from another report.

Fortunately the population wording quotes figures from the cases table. So one can spot the mistake and match things up correctly. The pdfs it has stored are OK of course. But it was quite a jigsaw to put together. The whole story with the links is laid out in the Appendix to this article.

Secondly it gives cumulative figures dating back to the start of vaccination (or before that even). In this way the fine detail of the present week is hidden in amongst all the other weeks data since vaccination began in December 2020. We solve this by subtracting two cumulative figures ending on dates one week apart.

Thirdly and most cynically, they apply the European 2013 age standardising morality formula to case numbers and hospitalisations. Public Health Scotland does the same thing. It is an outright fraud. Yes death rates are heavily effected by the age of the patient. But cases rates are not. One cannot apply a mortality compensator to a statistic that does not involve mortality. THAT IS FRAUD PURE AND SIMPLE.

One might as well compensate the case rates with how good people are at cooking spaghetti in the different age bands. It would be no less valid.

So to get the unvaxxed case rates per 100k of unvaxxed population we first need the Population of Canada – https://statistique.quebec.ca/en/produit/tableau/population-by-age-group-canada-and-regions

38,246,108 total less 1,882,571 (aged 0-4) less 2,044,238 (aged 5-9) less 40% of 2,091,276 (aged 10-14) or 836,510 = 33,482,789 aged 12 and over.

33,482,789. 33.5 million 12 years old and over to 1 decimal place.

36,363,537. 36.4 million 5 years old and over to 1 decimal place.

The Reports used for the analysis can all be viewed here –

Here are the cases, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccine status by week (except for the 14 day period from Dec4-18 wherein Dec11 was omitted due it being prepared around Christmas presumably). These are deduced from the table above by subtracting one weeks cumulative figures from the previous weeks cumulative figures. Then we deduce the case rate, the hospital visit rate and the death rate per 100k from the population figures in column2. Then we deduce the Immune/Vaccine efficiency percentage using the normalised case rate ratio formula of Pfizer.

One of the funny things that comes out of this data is that the unvaxxed celebrate Christmas and nobody else does! Either that or … protected the unvaxxed from Omicron over Christmas! Because only the blue line (unvaxxed) goes to Zero during the Christmas week and then bounces back actually above the purple line (single vaxxed).

The blue line does slightly better than the purple line until Omicron first hits in December. This is because 1 dose does not cause VAIDS. The red line (double vaxxed) does better than everybody until Omicron, when it becomes a disaster movie. That is VAIDS. The vaccines do have some effectiveness against Delta, but none against Omicron.

This graph is a great demonstrator of Immune system degradation from 60% to 20% in 10 weeks. Then Omicron kicks in and woops, we go to minus 98.8% in the Christmas week (because unvaxxed people celebrate Christmas more than vaxxed as we can see from the line graph above). Then we stabilise at around minus 75%.

In the meantime, the Expose on January 28th published an article using Canadian Government statistics to prove the progression of VAIDS in the doubly vaccinated. The Canadian government then rigged their figures for the week from Jan15-22 (which figures were produced in February) in an absurd attempt to disprove VAIDS.

They also deleted the pdf dated 2022January21, which I relied upon for the stats in the original piece – https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/documents/services/diseases/2019-novel-coronavirus-infection/surv-covid19-weekly-epi-update-20220121-en.pdf

In the pre-Christmas week when Omicron stuck in Canada, vaccine efficiency as measured by the normalised case rate ratio between the doubly vaxxed and the unvaxxed (which is how Pfizer measured it in their seminal Phase III vaccine trial) went from +23.8% to -98.8%. There was a -23.8% Christmas factor to these figures, which then stabilised at -75%.

This occurred because the miniscule initial vaccine efficiency against Omicron is very soon obliterated by the 4% of remaining immune system reduction each week in the doubly vaxxed. Omicron uncloaked this immune degradation.

But for the immune system to recover and for the vaccines to suddenly become better against Omicron than they were against Delta in one week, in circumstances where the CEO of Pfizer, Albert Bourla, has stated to Yahoo finance that 2 doses of his vaccine offer “very limited protection, if any” against Omicron is totally absurd.

And that is the Canadian Government is asking us to believe. It is an insult to everyone with more than two unvaccinated brain cells.

The German Cover Up

The Robert Koch Institut in Berlin, owned by the German Federal Ministry of Health, produced statistics on December30, 2021 which on page 14 of the weekly Covid19 management report for week 51 (from Monday December20 to Sunday December26) showed…

The unvaxxed had 186 Omicron cases and made up 26.5% of the population
The doubly vaxxed had 4020 Omicron case and made up 70.53% of the population.

So the case rate ratio, 2 dosed to no dosed, was 4020/186 x 26.5/70.53 = 8.12 to 1. This corresponds to an Immune system degradation of (1-8.12)/8.12 = -0.877 or -87.7%

So doubly vaxxed Germans were more than 8x likely to catch Omicron than their unvaxxed brothers. We now know that this figure correlated very closely with the Australian data for the 1st week in January (with a ratio of 10.72 to 1) and with the Canadian data for the last 2 weeks in December which had an immune degradation of 84%.

This was covered in the Daily Expose of January 2 – https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/02/german-gov-data-suggests-fully-vaccinated-developing-ade/. Then first thing on January3, the Robert Koch Institut discovered that they had ‘made a mistake’!

Yes, there had been a Koch up. They miraculously found 911 more unvaccinated Germans who had caught Omicron on the very next day after the Expose published figures that would have destroyed the credibility of Pfizer and Moderna against Omicron had they been permitted to stand.

How incredible that a bureaucracy could respond so quickly! How unbelievable that and outfit capable of such an alacratous response could have made such an elementary error in the first place. Or indeed that the error should only have been in the unvaccinated number and that all the other numbers in their 14 page report were perfectly correct.

Of course no explanation was given as to where these 911 unvaccinated Omicron sufferers had come from. Maybe there was an epidemic of the unvaccinated in the German antiterrorist office? The Expose covered this correction on January 9 – https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/09/life-insurance-data-proves-vaccinated-more-likely-to-die/

But once again the same pattern is seen. A government stats department produces figures proving that the vaccines have become anti vaccines and are seriously degrading the immune systems of their people and rather than having an enquiry to determine how their people can best be protected from these toxins, they just rig the figures.

The Germans, being one of the more efficient governments in this world, rigged their figures more quickly and more decisively than most of their competitors in Covid cover ups.

The PHE Cover Up

I wrote to various branches of PHE and Sajid Javid on 1st July 21 saying –

Sir,

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/997418/Variants_of_Concern_VOC_Technical_Briefing_17.pdf
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/997414/Variants_of_Concern_VOC_Technical_Briefing_16.pdf

Here are the PHE data for Delta deaths in the week from June14-June21. Vax status on June 17 was…22% 1 jab and 63% 2 jabs and 15% 0 jabs (at least 21 days previously) – https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55274833

0 Jabs 38-34 = 4 dead from 3.5m over 50s (15%)
1 Jabs 17-10 = 7 dead from 5.2m over 50s (22%)
2 Jabs 50-26 = 24 dead from 14.9m over 50s (63%)

0 Jabs are 4×63/15×24 = 0.70x more likely to die than 2 Jabs
0 Jabs are 4×22/15×7 = 0.83x more likely to die than 1 Jab
2 Jabs are 24×22/63×7 = 1.20x more likely to die than 1 Jab

So in the week from June14-21, the latest published PHE data, you were better off not being vaccinated. And 1 Jab was better than 2 Jabs.
These data are for death with COVID rather than deaths from COVID. There are 23.6m people over 50 in the UK. 1350 of these die every day of all causes. So during 7 days 9450 would die. This is a rate of 0.4 per 1000. Total cases were 976 (0Jabs), 3865 (1Jab), 3546 (2Jabs). So if we deduct those who would have died anyway we get.

0 Jabs 4 – 0.4 = 3.6 dead from 3.5m over 50s (15%)
1 Jabs 7 – 1.5 = 5.5 dead from 5.2m over 50s (22%)
2 Jabs 24 – 1.4 = 22.6 dead from 14.9m over 50s (63%)

0 Jabs are 3.6×63/15×22.6 = 0.67x more likely to die than 2 Jabs
0 Jabs are 3.6×22/15×5.5 = 0.96x more likely to die than 1 Jab
2 Jabs are 22.6×22/63×5.5 = 1.44x more likely to die than 1 Jab

So the best we have for the week from June14-21 from PHE data is that 1 Jab gives the same protection a 0 Jabs. And 2 Jabs make things worse.
24 delta deaths from 2 Jabs compared to 4 delta deaths from 0 Jabs is a disaster.

Regards…

Their response was to fail to publish Technical Bulletin 18 on July2 and instead to publish it on July9 and change the frequency of publication to biweekly rather than weekly – an incredible thing to do to a weekly report.

All the other countries whose data I have seen, publish weekly Covid reports, not biweekly Covid reports. And of course PHE figures never again showed that being unvaxxed gave a lower death rate than being doubly vaxxed.

…What should have happened is an immediate investigation comparing the benefits of one dose to that of two doses and zero doses.

But every set of figures I have seen since then, and I have seen very many sets, from very many countries, shows clearly that 1 jab is better than 2. The reason for this I now know. 1 Jab does not give the spikes a large enough advantage over your immune system to start degrading it much. You need two jabs to really kick off the progressive degradation of the immune system.

If you have only had 1 jab there is no data I have seen showing that you will get VAIDS.

Another common feature to all the Covid stats cover ups I have seen is that the initial stats for each new variant are fairly accurate because the politicians have not yet decided what to do with them and the techies who produce the stats will produce the truth if they are not interfered with by politicians who lie for a living.

Now the techies KNOW that their stats show vaccines to be dangerous. But they are smart enough not to tell that to the politicians. The Politicians are too stupid or too lazy or to incurious to discover for themselves that their own stats are destroying their vaccine pushing sales patter.

So they carry on regardless until some media outfit (generally The Expose) informs the world that their own stats prove that vaccines are killing people. Then rather than stopping that killing, they just rig the stats to cover up the deaths.

The UKHSA Cover Up

On 2021October10, The Expose carried a piece which showed clearly that vaccine were causing a form of AIDS. The piece went viral and ended up being quoted on Alex Jones through the Reese report and by President Bolsonaro of Brazil.

Then on October15, October 23 and October 27, The Expose published 3 follow up pieces which confirmed the original article. …

Here is the weekly decline in doubly vaccinated immune system performance compared to unvaxxed people. Vaccine efficacy is measured using Pfizer’s vaccine effectiveness formula…

(Unvaxxed case rate – Vaxxed case rate)/the Larger of Unvaxxed or Vaxxed case rate – We are using the normalised absolute ratio of vaxxed to unvaxxed case numbers to determine vaccine efficiency just as Pfizer itself did in the Supplementary Appendix to their Phase III clinical trial results.

A Vaccine efficacy of +50% means that doubly vaxxed people are 50% more protected from Covid than unvaxxed people. It means that the delta case rate in the vaxxed is half the delta case rate in the unvaxxed.
A Vaccine efficacy of -50% means that unvaxxed people are 50% more protected from Covid than doubly vaxxed people. It means that the delta case rate in the vaxxed is double the delta case rate in the unvaxxed.
A Vaccine efficacy of 0% means that doubly vaccinated people are 0% more protected from Covid than unvaxxed people. It means that the delta case rate in the vaxxed equals the delta case rate in the unvaxxed. It means the vaccines have lost all their effectiveness.

“Everybody over 30 will have lost 100% of their entire immune capability (certainly for Covid and most likely for viruses and certain cancers – following the evidence from Cole Diagnostics in Idaho and Dr Nathan Thompson and Dr Ralph Baric) within 13 weeks”. – https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/10/27/official-government-reports-suggest-the-fully-vaccinated-will-develop-acquired-immunodeficiency-syndrome-by-christmas/

These were accurate figures from the UKHSA that clearly showed progressive week on week immune system degradation, just as the Canadian figures above showed for the last 10 weeks before Omicron hit Canada. This was the techies at the UKHSA telling us the truth.

But after 4 hard hitting articles in The Expose showing that these vaccines cause a form of AIDS, the politicians stepped in…

On November2, the Daily Mail published an article revealing that…

UK statistics watchdog scolds PHE’s replacement body for publishing ‘misleading’ figures which anti-vaxxers have seized as proof that Covid jabs don’t work
2. Over the past few weeks, the agency’s data shows infection rates are higher in fully-vaccinated adults compared to the unjabbed.
3. Anti-vaxx commentators and campaigners have seized the data as proof that Covid vaccines don’t work.

The UK’s Statistics Watchdog is The Office of Statistics Regulation (TOSR for short). Yes Offstats told the UKHSA that their Stats were off.

TOSR director general Ed Humpherson yesterday wrote to the UKHSA’s boss Dr Jenny Harries on November1 thanking her for the changes she had made and is quoted in the Daily Mail as saying

‘It remains the case that the surveillance report includes rates per 100,000 which can be used to argue that vaccines are not effective,’
‘I know that this is not the intention of the surveillance report, but the potential for misuse remains.

There is the tacit admission by the Government that the purpose of their stats is not to enable the public to decide for themselves whether the vaccines are effective or not. No their stats should not even be able to support an argument that the vaccines are ineffective.

Indeed any such construction of UKHSA statistics would be a misuse of government data according to the Director General. This is his candid admission that the use of all UKHSA data is exclusively to prove the vaccines are effective. And any government statistics agency which departs from that line shall be re-adjusted by TOSR.

He is defining the UKHSA as a pro vaccine propaganda outfit, a sales are of Pfizer inc. whose mandate is only to supply information for one side of the debate.

No person in the UK can be expected to make an informed choice of whether to take Pfizer’s experimental gene corrupting snake bite when it is presented to them by the government as an unquestionably effective Covid vaccination. – https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10155799/Stats-watchdog-scolds-PHE-replacement-data-misuse-supports-anti-vaxxers.html

So here was the UKHSA cover up ordered by the TSOR.

The PHS Cover up

Here is Table12 from the latest PHS Weekly Covid Statistical Reports – https://publichealthscotland.scot/publications/covid-19-statistical-report/covid-19-statistical-report-9-february-2022/

The red warning above appeared after the expose used PHS figures to prove that vaccines increase your chances of being infected with Covid, and they increase your chances of being hospitalised with Covid and they increase your chances of dying from Covid. – https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/09/distracted-by-christmas-party-data-shows-9-in-10-covid-deaths-vaccinated/

Had PHS cared about the life of their fellow Scots, they would have terminated vaccination pending a full public inquiry. But they do not care if Scots live or die so long as they live or die fully vaccinated. And yet even that term is a total fraud.

Nobody who is vaccinated with Pfizer or Moderna is fully vaccinated at all. If they were fully vaccinated, then they would not get infected with Covid would they?

If they were fully vaccinated then they would not need a booster and another booster would they?

Fully vaccinated people are fully duped, fully conned and are on the way to having their genes fully corrupted and their immune systems fully compromised. The one thing they are not is fully vaccinated.

As regards Public Health Scotland. To paraquote Sir Winston, no longer are they in the business of public health and no longer do they represent Scotland. They are in the business of gene corrupting drug pushing through fraudulent statistics, and they represent the interests of American Pharmaceutical companies, not the interests of Scotland or her people.

The notes underneath Table12 above refer to Appendix6 of the report, which says:: Age standardised case, hospitalisation and mortality rates are used to allow comparisons of case, hospitalisation and mortality rates between populations that have different age distributions.

The 2013 European Standard Population is used to standardise rates. For more information – see the ONS methods. Here is the full link – https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/methodologies/weeklycovid19agestandardisedmortalityratesbyvaccinationstatusenglandmethodology

Notice that it refers to Age Standardised Mortality Rates. Here is some of what it says:

Age-standardised mortality rates: Age-standardised mortality rates (ASMRs) are used to allow for comparisons to be made between populations that may contain different overall population sizes and proportions of people of different ages.

These are plainly age standardised MORTALITY rates. They are not age standardised Hospitalisation rates and they are not age standardised Case rates. There is absolutely no age standardisation that is needed for case rates or hospital rates. And even if there was, said rates would not been known in 2013 when the mortality rates were calculated, because there were no Covid cases in 2013 and there were no Covid hospitalisations in 2013.

To apply a 2013 European mortality rate to a 2019 Covid case rate is an all out fraud being committed by PHS and by the Canadian government in broad daylight. Even the UKHSA does not treat its taxpaying funders with such studied intellectual contempt.

Age standardised mortality rates are a compensation method designed to account for age discrepancies in mortality rates between the different statistical groups (such as groups with different vaccine statuses). They are merely a corruption when applied to statistical groups who are not dying. As mentioned above: One cannot apply a mortality compensator to a statistic that does not involve mortality. THAT IS FRAUD PURE AND SIMPLE.

One might as well compensate the case rates with how good people in the 5 year age bands are at singing Whitney Houston. It would be no less valid.

But if one does apply Euro 2013 Age Standardised Mortality Rates to case rates and hospitalisation rates then since the unvaxxed are slightly younger, than the vaxxed it makes the numbers look better for the vaccinated. Furthermore since neither PHS nor the UKHSA nor Canada provide data by vax status by age band (not withstanding FOI requests by Profs Fenton and Neil of QMC to do just that). They can do what they want with those numbers.

Here is an example of PHS using this fraud to persuade Scots to get vaccinated…

“In the past four weeks from 08 January 2022 to 04 February 2022, the age-standardised rate of hospital admissions per 100,000 was 2.9 to 3.8 times lower in individuals with their third dose or booster dose of vaccine compared to unvaccinated individuals or have received one or two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine”. – PHS Covid19 Statistical Report Feb9

But the very fact that both Canada and PHS apply Euro 2013 Age Standardised Mortality Rates to non mortality statistics shows us all we need to know about what is going on here. It is wholesale fraud and it is worldwide. And that brings us back to the observations of Dr Coetzee that Omicron is mild in the unvaxxed (77% of South Africans in 2021November) and does not lead to hospitalisation or acute respiratory infection (in Southern Hemisphere Summer)., The reason that Euro politicians tried to not only silence her but to persuade her to say the opposite of what she had found in her medical practice, is that she was threatening the basis for further vaccinations. She was actually pronouncing deliverance from a pandemic, which is great for the health of Europe. But the politicians are not interested in that health. Vaccination is the end they seek, not good health. Dr Coetzee has exposed their true motivation.

UKHSA and PHS Interpretation Warnings are Outright Frauds

UKHSA Note1 to Table13: Comparing case rates among vaccinated and unvaccinated populations should not be used to estimate vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 infection. Vaccine effectiveness has been formally estimated from a number of different sources and is summarised on pages 4 to 15 in this report.

PHS Note1 to Table12: Data in this table should not be used as a measure of vaccine effectiveness due to unaccounted for biases and risk factors in different populations. For more information, please see the Interpretation of data and Vaccine effectiveness summary sections above.

On Page 13 of the Supplementary Appendix to Pfizer’s seminal Phase III clinical trial of their BTN162b2 mRNA Covid19 Vaccine, Pfizer defined and calculated the effectiveness of their vaccine as the normalised case rate ratio between the vaxxed and the unvaxxed …

VE against severe occurrence after dose 1 was 1-1/30 = 29/30 = 0.96666 or 96.7%
VE against severe occurrence after dose 1 and before dose 2 was 1-0/6 = 1 = 100%
VE against severe occurrence from <7 days after Dose 2 was 1-0/1 = 1 = 100%
VE against severe occurrence >=7 days after dose 2 was 1-1/23 = 22/23 = 0.9566 or 95.7%

Pfizer defined calculated and claimed Vaccine Efficacies of 96.7% for 1 dose and 95.7% for 2 doses using the very normalised case rate ratio that the UKHSA and PHS instruct readers NOT to use.

The numbers in the table 1, 0, 0, 1 for the vaccinated and 30, 6, 1, 23 for the unvaccinated, were actual case numbers not calculated case ratios. But they were also the respective case rates per 23k people because the numbers in each group were almost identical (23,040 vaxxed and 23,037 unvaxxed) as shown above under BNT162b2 and Placebo.

So PHS and the UKHSA are instructing their readers not to use the definition that all regulatory agencies relied upon in granting their emergency use Authorisations for the vaccines.

They are therefore instructing their readers not to use the correct definition of vaccine efficiency. That is a fraud. PHS go further in this fraud and represent that Pfizer’s formula should not be used on their raw data “due to unaccounted for biases and risk factors in different populations”.

It is true that any two populations unless randomly chosen, will have unaccounted for biases and risk factors influencing infection rates such as ethnicity, time vaccinated, age etc. But no government department has ever compensated for any of these confounding factors except for the factor of age using the irrelevant and inapplicable Euro 2013 Age Standardisation Mortality rates. Cases are not Deaths.

One cannot successfully compensate for age in Covid case numbers using Euro 2013 all cause mortality figures.. All cause 2013 Euro death rates do not vary with age in the same manner as 2019 Covid infection rates. Nobody in Europe in 2013 even knew there would be a pandemic in 2019 (although some Americans and some Chinese did possibly know it). PHS is just setting up the less statistically minded reader for a compensation fraud.

What these UKHSA and PHS warnings should say is that normalised case rate ratios are the correct way to calculate vaccine efficiencies and all the other figures in this report which do not equate to said correct calculation are inaccurate to the extent of their disparity there from.

The Danish Cover Up

Here are the Danish figures from their Statens Serum Institut: Nov21 to Dec25 – https://files.ssi.dk/covid19/omikron/statusrapport/rapport-omikronvarianten-31122021-ct18

So the ratio of double or triple vaxxed Omicron cases to unvaxxed cases is 37,111 to 3500 or 10.6 to 1.
Whereas the vaccination rates at the mid point of the 34 day period on December8 were 76.83 fully vaxxed, 0.14% singly vaxxed and 23.03% unvaxxed.

So the case rate ration between fully vaxxed and unvaxxed was 10.6×23.03/76.83 = 3.18x.

So the anti-vaccine efficiency against Omicron in Denmark was (1-3.18)/3.18 = -68.6%

The Expose published this on 2022January28. The response of the Statens Serum Institut in Denmark was to cease publication of their Omikron Status Report 9 days later on 2022February6 …

Conclusion

In Germany, in Australia, in Canada, in Denmark, in Scotland and in England we see the same pattern of events. A new variant comes out and the techies of the respective government stats departments do their job and get reasonably accurate statistics out for the new variant.

Then The Expose publishes an analysis of these virgin statistics which have not yet been defiled by politicians. That analysis reveals the truth that doubly vaccinated people now have almost fully blown VAIDS, and therefore the vaccines lead to more infections, more hospitalisations and more deaths than in the unvaccinated.

The politicians are then told about these articles. So all government stats departments must be avid readers of The Expose!

PHE certainly wasted no time in responding to my email. 24 hours later I rang them to speak to their chief statistics whizz about their figures. The response from their Public Accountability Office, was to ban me from communicating with them for 6 months.

I paid no attention to their ban of course, because they are supposed to be the Public Accountability Office and I am a member of the public to whom they are supposed to be accountable!

So some bright spark then explains to the politicians that their statistics defeat their drug pushing narrative and destroy the scientific basis for their snake bite genetic corruption mandates (not perhaps in so many words). The politicians then respond by instructing their stats departments to commit medical fraud and cover up the death, disability, pain and suffering that these vaccines cause. …

We know that government statistics people bend the truth to order, because Prof Graham Medley, the Head of Covid modelling for SAGE, admitted as much to Fraser Nelson of the Spectator Magazine.”

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Covering Up Thousands of Covid Vax Deaths in the UK, and Elsewhere By Richard Miller (London)

Fully vaccinated Brits succumbing to VAIDS

The Australian Cover Up

The Canadian Cover Up

The German Cover Up

The PHE Cover Up

The UKHSA Cover Up

The PHS Cover up

UKHSA and PHS Interpretation Warnings are Outright Frauds

The Danish Cover Up

Conclusion

Comments

Other Sites

Categories

Blog Search

Archive

Support Jar

THE LEAGUE’S FREEDOM CAMPAIGN