China’s Immigration Policies Will Keep China a Yellow Country: Squawk! Racism! By Chris Knight

     It is inconceivable that any media elite in China would proclaim shock! horror! about China wanting to remain majority Han Chinese. But, in the US, Australia and the rest of the West, maintenance of white ethnic identity is utter racism. So how can what is good for China be bad for us? Let’s ask a politically correct liberal, shall we?
  https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/08/14/msnbcs-katty-kay-doubles-down-white-house-wants-to-keep-america-a-majority-white-country/

“Wednesday, MSNBC “Morning Joe” guest host Katty Kay echoed her remarks from a day earlier and suggested in wake of the proposed public rule charge, a  regulation where legal immigrants would be less likely to secure a permanent residency in the United States if they have used any forms of welfare in the past, that the Trump administration’s immigration policies are meant to prevent a “demographic change” in the country. According to Kay, the White House wants to keep America “a majority white country.” “It’s purely, isn’t it, about trying to keep America the way that this White House would like it to be in the face of demographic change and that is a majority white country and they know that that’s changing?” Kay asked PBS and network contributor Yamiche Alcindor. Alcindor argued government assistance programs were created as “bridges to the American Dream.” She added, “[T]he idea that now the government is saying, look, if you ever use these programs that were there for a bridge, we’re going to hold that against you, goes against basically exactly what these programs were made to do.”

     I hope she is learning Spanish, if she hopes to survive in the world that her kind is creating. Hopefully the new regime will replace these people. And here is a sample of the Great Replacement, that liberals say is a conspiracy, unless they are saying it, of course:
  https://www.breitbart.com/education/2019/08/14/university-of-south-dakota-tells-white-students-to-stop-taking-up-space/

“Diversity officials at the University of South Dakota are asking white students to consider if they are “taking up” too much “space” on campus. According to a report by Campus Reform, programming created by diversity office officials at the University of South Dakota asks white students to consider if they are “taking” too much “space” away from minority students. “Are you taking up space or contributing to a space?” the graphic reads. The flowchart asks white students to answer a series of questions that determine whether or not they are contributing to the “diversity” of the campus. In practice, the flowchart asks non-minorities to not speak at all in many given situations. “Will you be representing a relevant minority identity?” the flowchart’s first question ask. “Do you have enough perspective to represent that identity?” it continues. “Would your participation prevent helpful voices from being heard?” the flowchart adds towards the end. “Does your involvement prevent the exploitation of relevant identities?” The University of South Dakota’s flowchart may soon be a piece of evidence in an investigation into leftist bias on college campuses. The President of the South Dakota Board of Regents announced in July that he will launch an investigation to ensure that the state’s public institutions are free from bias an indoctrination. In a column on the matter, the president eloquently defended academia as a marketplace of ideas. In summary, we should not inhibit or promote ideologies of the left or the right. They should all be presented, but none dictated. Balance and common sense are important. Student learning is and must remain the focus of the university experience. Exposure to diverse ideas in political, philosophical, scientific, literary, artistic and other disciplines is an important part of that experience. Manipulated indoctrination into any one of them undermines it. Students overwhelmingly support free speech and diversity, but oppose being forced to fund disruptions by media-starved extremists. We are committed to that end.”

     Thus, it is no longer simply moving whitey to the back of the bus, but rather moving him out of the bus altogether, in the politically correct world of the new regime. This has been coming since at least the 1960s and gets worse by the day.