Changing the Vaccine Definitions for Big Pharma By Brian Simpson
It happened without any objection from mainstream doctors, but it was necessary to change the traditional definition of “vaccine, and “vaccinated” to fit the mRNA vaxxes. Thus, in the past, the CDC defined a vaccine as “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease.” But, the CDC soon changed the definition to “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.” So, it was almost as if there was a cover for what we have seen, where there is an open admission even by those such a Covid king Dr Fauci, that the vaxxes do not act well to stop transmission, which is what should have happened in traditional vaccines. Talk about slippery.
“In September 2021, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was caught stealthily changing the definition of the word “vaccine,” as well as what it means to be “fully vaccinated,” because the experimental mRNA jab was not meeting the well-established criteria under the old definition – and people were taking notice.
Unfortunately for the so-called ‘experts,’ independent journalist Alex Berenson ensured the change did not fly under the radar, as reported by TGP’s Larry Johnson. For sounding the alarm on the CDC’s change, Berenson was suspended permanently from Twitter – but, following a court settlement earlier this month, his account was reinstated.
Before the change, the CDC website defined vaccine as:
- Vaccine – “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease.”
But gone are the days of vaccines producing so-called “immunity.” Now, the official CDC definition moves the goal posts and states that the experimental mRNA jab, and vaccines in general, simply “STIMULATE THE BODY’S IMMUNE RESPONSE.”
And that’s how you end up with Covid-1984.
After the change, via CDC:
- Vaccine – “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune responseagainst diseases.”
At the time, CDC officials justified their actions by claiming, ridiculously, that the “slight changes” that were made “haven’t impacted the overall definition” of vaccines. In fact, they claimed to be doing the public a favor with the update, as the previous definitions were apparently too confusing for the non-expert layman to understand without a deep understanding of sCiEnCe.
This way, the definition is more “transparent,” a CDC spokesperson explained to The Miami Herald:
[The previous definitions could have been] interpreted to mean that vaccines were 100% effective, which has never been the case for any vaccine, so the current definition is more transparent, and also describes the ways in which vaccines can be administered.”
Well, sure enough, the CDC’s bogus spin proved to be yet another outright lie, as newly obtained emails that were released by The Epoch Times this week show the communication between frantic CDC officials who were scrambling to change the definition of vaccines because the failures of the experimental jab had become “problematic” in relation to the old definition.
In one exchange that was sent by CDC official Alycia Downs on August 25, 2021, she warns her colleagues about how people are beginning to notice that the experimental Covid jab doesn’t even meet the CDC’s own definition. This seems to be when CDC officials began taking notice of the issue. One month later, the definition was changed.
So much for “transparency.””
“Newly obtained emails confirm that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) changed its definition for both “vaccine” and “vaccinated” because people were pointing out that the definitions didn’t seem to apply to the COVID-19 vaccines.
“The definition of vaccine we have posted is problematic and people are using it to claim the COVID-19 vaccine is not a vaccine based on our own definition,” Alycia Downs, a CDC official, wrote in an email to a colleague on Aug. 25, 2021.
The definition is located on the CDC webpage on immunization basics.
“Vaccine” had been defined since at least 2011 by the CDC as a product that triggers immunity, while “vaccination” was described as an injection that prevents a disease, according to archived versions of the page. However, a flood of inquiries on the definitions was triggered by the fact that the COVID-19 vaccines have been increasingly ineffective against infection by the virus that causes COVID-19, the emails show.
“Our question is how is the CDC and the rest of the world allowed to call the shot a vaccination when it doesn’t even meet your own definition,” one person wrote to the CDC.
“Right-wing covid-19 pandemic deniers are using your ‘vaccine’ definition to argue that mRNA vaccines are not vaccines,” another said.
The Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines are both built on messenger RNA technology. They’re two of the three COVID-19 vaccines available in the United States.
Downs and colleagues Allison Michelle Fisher, Cynthia Jorgensen, Valerie Morelli, and Andrew (no last name given) worked on changing the definitions for “vaccine” and “vaccination,” according to the emails.
The changes were pushed through on Aug. 31, 2021, and Sept. 1, 2021, respectively.
Changing Definitions
“Vaccine” is now defined as “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.
“Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose,” the definition reads.
The previous definition was “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.”
“Vaccination” was changed to “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease” from “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.”
Attorney Travis Miller obtained some of the missives in 2021 and published screenshots of them. At the time, the CDC didn’t dispute their authenticity. The Epoch Times has obtained the emails and additional messages concerning the changes and has published all 67 pages of them.
The batch of emails, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, also shows that Andrew, a CDC employee on the agency’s Vaccine Task Force, boosted a Washington Post article that downplayed criticism of the change.
“I’ve only seen a couple of inquiries about the change to this page. I think the WaPo article explains the problem well—that people are misinterpreting ‘immunity’ to mean 100% protection,” Andrew wrote.
Downs replied, “Thank you, Andrew! I really appreciate your response.”
A CDC spokesperson told The Epoch Times that the “slight changes in wording” haven’t altered “the overall definition” of “vaccine,” noting that “the previous definition at Immunization Basics | CDC could be interpreted to mean that vaccines were 100 percent effective, which has never been the case for any vaccine, so the current definition is more transparent and also describes the ways in which vaccines can be administered.”
Some other portions of the CDC website still state that COVID-19 vaccines confer immunity. One page, for instance, states that “getting a COVID-19 vaccination is a safer and more dependable way to build immunity to COVID-19 than getting sick with COVID-19.”
Comments