We have been covering the European Union issue of internet censorship via the recently passed legislation of the Digital Services Act. Michael Snyder has a piece where he discusses the significance of this Act for Americans, and by implication, this applies to Australians as well. It means that woke bureaucrats in the EU will decide what goes and what does not, on the internet. It will be done by forcing Big Tech to self-censor under fear of penalties of up to 6 percent of their annual incomes. Naturally, this will panic them into massive censorship. And, as is noted, the law applies to material coming from overseas, so this is an indirect way of censoring the world.

The target is anything the EU regards as “false and misleading,” which is not defined in the Act, and is decided by the bureaucrats and policed by woke fact checkers. It will mean that almost all Dissent Right content will be eventually pulled from the web.

This has been speculated about for some time, but now the studies are being done. It has been shown that people receiving a Covid vaccine booster are more likely to contract the Covid infection than those who received no vaccine at all. This is based upon a study of prisoners in California, with subjects from 33 prisons. Yes, that is a lot of prisons in that most liberal of states. The data comprised 96,201 prisons, a healthy sample, with 2,835 cases, and 1,187 of the cases were among people who had received a bivalent vaccine, versus just 568 cases were the unvaccinated. The rest received old monovalent vaccines. Infection rates in the group receiving bivalent shots was 3.2 percent, compared to the 2.7 percent in the unvaccinated.

According to the standard Covid narrative, still pushed by health authorities in Australia of safe and effective, results such as this must be ignored as they are contrary to the Covid religion.

He Jiankui, a communist Chinese scientist, was jailed for engaging in human experimentation, attempting to gene edit babies, so that is saying something. He is a firm adherent of transhumanism, that genetic modification of humans is necessity to improve the human species, if not replace it by the next evolutionary thing. Anyway, he was jailed for over-the-top experiments, but now he is out, and doing much the same again. And in fact, he is starting to get a celebrity status with a big fancy write up in The New Yorker, linked below.

It goes to show that in out technocracy, mad science is pretty much becoming normal science, and carrying humanity with it in its flood … if we remain oblivious to it, and hence become passive recipients of its evils.

We have been reporting on the somewhat rapid moves to roll back in the Covid mandates, beginning with masks for many US federal government departments, then masks in schools and universities. Lockdowns have not yet occurred but New York, a testing ground for the Covid plandemic, is proposing isolation and quarantine camps, just like was constructed in Australia, during the mania.

The State of New York, with New York Governor Kathy Hochul and the Department of Health, are appealing a ruling last year, Borrello v. Hochul, that struck down the New York State “totalitarian and unconstitutional isolation and quarantine state regulation.” These camps were even more oppressive than ones in communist China: “It allowed the Department of Health to pick and choose which New Yorkers they could lock up or lock down, with no proof that you were ever even exposed to, let alone actually sick with, a communicable disease. They could have locked you down in your home, or they could have removed you from your home and forced you to quarantine in a facility of their choosing.

An article at American Greatness.com, comments on how the globalist elite World Economic Forum, has taken the climate change catastrophe narrative over from the Left for its own purposes, which is, global control by its kind of people. For the first time, a globalist organisation seeks to limit prosperity, at least for the great majority of people, not of course, for themselves or their kind. Thus, both international socialism and the World Economic Forum are united in levelling the West by a vast redistribution of resources to the Third World, so everyone is equal at the bottom of the wheelie bin of history.

 And as argued by our favourite Russian, Igor Chudov, there is an indication that the World Economic Forum, through central bank control by its members, will seek to engineer a global recession to radically reduce carbon dioxide emissions:

It is clear that with the West facing imminent destruction, that some sort of deus ex machina, a saving hero, or heroes are needed. The case has been put that both Robert Kennedy and Vivek Ramaswamy, could serve in a Trump administration to keep Trump honest and brave in dismantling the Deep state. The argument is that Robert Kennedy could serve as Secretary of Health and Human Services, and there is no doubt that given his track record, he will tear them up, and reverse the World Health organization pandemic treaty.

Mustafa Suleyman, co-founder of Google DeepMind AI technology, is the latest AI technocrat to warn that AI and genetic engineering now presents nations, and terrorists, with new power to create super-pandemics. AI will allow the design of viruses not present in nature, that humans have no natural defence against.

 Suleyman thinks that limiting access to basic biological material will be the answer. But, like most things, committed terrorist will get around that, and presumably the day is not too far off when the viruses will be simply printed off. If a human embryo can be created from stem cells, with no sperm or egg, as has recently been done, it is not far fetched or fanciful to suppose that designer viruses, not yet seen, will roll off the production line of some bioweapon’s lab. No doubt, this is already happening. 

Bob Livingston Alerts, via email, are always good and thought provoking. He has recently sent out an email which is essentially an extended mediation upon a famous John Adams quote made in 1776: "Fear is the foundation of most governments." As he argues, with the Covid plandemic as a telling example, along with fear, the governments use deceit as well, lying to the population, often with a bare face, and laughing at their audacity.

We are seeing this at present in major aspects of the Australian Labor government policies, such as mass immigration, which is the highest it has been in the post-World War II world. This is generating a vast housing crisis, putting Aussies on the streets, but the government denies that immigration is a problem, and pushes the line that migrants bring wealth and hence create housing, in the longer term, and skills, eternally short, are always needed. Yes, but as John Maynard Keynes said: “But this long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task, if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us, that when the storm is long past, the ocean is flat again.” 

David Thunder has put together a good critique of the EU Digital Services Act, and how this is a quantum leap in censorship tyranny by the globalist elites.  This new law allows the European Commission to apply legal pressure upon Big Tech digital platforms to deal with “hate speech,” “disinformation,” and threats to “civic discourse,” ideas which are never precisely defined, because the European Commission wants the net to be as wide as possible, to capture all communications it does not approve of. That includes all nationalist, Christian and conservative thought. Trusted flaggers, as they are called, will be employed to search out problematic content, and one can be sure that they will find what they are paid to search for. And Big Tech will face fines of 6 percent of its global turnover, so the Act will make Big Tech even more censoring.

The EU Act will impact upon free speech on the net in countries outside of the EU, since Big Tech will still be liable if content from outside the EU, violates EU ideologies. Thus, what we now have is a global censorship mechanism. Expect that national governments will enact similar laws just because they feel the need, or are told by the globalist rulers, to fall in line with the EU.    

Australia’s international student numbers are “off the charts,” according to the headline from Marcobusiness.com.au, and they are not kidding. The figures cited below are mind-numbing: a net 502,000 visa holders (excluding tourists) arrived in Australia in the year to July, with student visas being 297,000 of these arrivals. There are 2,554,201 temporary visas  on issue in July 2023, making one in ten people in this country a temporary migrant! And it is now openly admitted that all of these temporary migrants will gain residency, that is the whole purpose of the international student supermarket.

There is no doubt that the present replacement level migration, which if it continues, will make Australia majority non-white even before all other countries facing the same non-white destiny, such as the US. Australia is the great racial experiment of the globalist elites. Probably the globo commo idea here, that the globo commo Labor Party seems to have as a subtext, is to complete the Asianisation policy that Keating and Howard et al. began, so that what was once Australia, falls into communist China due to demographic destiny. Why waste money on defence spending then?

We should still be very interested in the Covid vax issue for two good reasons. First, the elites want to bring back the mandates, if the US situation, which we covered at the blog is any indication. Second, the Covid vax injuries are not over, and by some accounts are just beginning. Effects on fertility and women’s reproductive health, as lead critic here, Dr Naomi Wolf has argued, will span decades, and may even go into the next generation.

Then there is the issue of excess mortality, that across the West, the death rate is higher than average, yet this is not due to Covid or other causes. The smoking gun indicates the vax, but the establishment prefers to say that it is unknown, rather than panic people with the idea that they have a ticking time bomb inside them. Studies have shown that the mRNA spike protein remains in the body for at least six months, and perhaps indefinitely. As the push for new vaccine shots is now in motion, for many this process will continue, for in this society it is vaccine unto death.

The world continues a slow march to World War III, and it is utterly amazing tht it has not happened yet. Artur Lyukmanov, is director of the Russian Foreign Ministry's International Information Security Department and special representative to President Vladimir Putin on international cooperation on information security, has warned that the West continues cyber attacks against Russia, but Russia has the means and will to defend itself: “"We want to halt further deterioration," Lyukmanov said. "A mistake in the use of ICTs [information and communication technologies] may lead to a direct conflict, an all-out war, especially as that the White House is aware that Russia has all the necessary capabilities to defend itself. A devastative computer attack against our critical information infrastructure will not be left without response." By this he presumably means nuclear war, since the cyber attacks could well threaten the functioning of some of Russia’s nuclear defences, which Putin would see as an existential threat.

What is usually ignored in this discussion about cyber-warfare is that the most danger comes from EMP, electromagnetic pulse attacks, upon the grid and electronic infrastructure. It would only take one large nuclear bomb exploded in the stratosphere to achieve this, and to kill, according to Dr Peter Pry, and a US Congressional Report, 90 percent of the population in urban areas from the collapse of infrastructure support, as everything that uses electricity grinds to a halt:

The good news is that present all states except Tasmania look like going for the No side to knock over the highly divisive Voice referendum. I am surprised at Tasmania though; if anything, I thought some woke state like my own Victoria would go Yes. But, it is a survey, and it is only as good as the input data, that is, the numbers looked at, and such surveys are most often wrong. That cuts both ways too, and we should not rest up now, as we do not really know the state of play of the Voice until the fat lady sings. Ops, are we still allowed to use that old saying about the valkyrie Brünnhilde from  Wagner's opera cycle Der Ring des Nibelungen ? Probably not; Wagner was white you know.

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/all-states-but-tasmania-set-to-vote-no-on-voice/ar-AA1gw5CB?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=935dca06f2984fb484404f723920f1c4&ei=13

Japanese popular culture has been fascinated by the movie conception of Godzilla, a giant monster created by radioactivity, that rises from the sea and sets out to destroy Tokyo. The post-World War II film was a metaphor for the destruction of the atomic bomb, and concern of the ill-effects of radioactivity, that Japan knew only too well from two American bombs being dropped upon them.

Elites of the UN and the World Economic Forum continue to push the climate change catastrophe position, to justify their radical policies of banning fossil fuels and cars powered by fossil fuels, as well as meat, and net zero carbon policies, including fines who people who offend.  All of this is supposed to be supported by the science. You know, the science that Greta Thunberg says we must trust.

But, what science? Over 1,600 scientists have signed a declaration rejecting the idea of a climate emergency according to  the Global Climate Intelligence Group. It is stated: “Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.”

Benito Mussolini (1885-1945), Italian fascist leader said: "Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power." On this account, most governments in the West are fascist, including Australia. While lip service is given to “democracy,” those who get their way with governments are the corporates, including Big Pharma. The Covid plandemic clearly showed this, with Big pharma influencing health technocrats, who in turn offered policies to governments, such as lockdowns, to soften up people for mass consumption of the vax.

And when the vaccines were available, the government and its health authorities became little more than travelling salespersons for the vax. Respect for time-honoured medical principles such as autonomy and freedom of choice of medical treatment went out the window in the frantic push for the vax. And now, as the dust has settled, governments are not facing responsibility regarding injuries. Big Pharma was permitted to have indemnities in its contracts, kept largely confidential, and given a dream deal. It is free from legal liability whatever injuries ultimately arise. If that is not fascism, nothing is.

Here is one more problem with the Covid vaxxes, given to children, who are generally a low risk group, not needing a Covid vax at all, even assuming that the vax worked. The Pfizer mRNA vax has been shown in a recent study to weaken children’s’ immune response to non-Covid bacteria and viruses, and the fall in immune response occurred within weeks after the jab, and lasted for at least six months. This was the time of the duration of the study, so the decline could well be much longer.

The conclusion of the production of a long-term immune deficiency was not clearly stated in the paper, but is an implication that various researchers deduced from it, as the authors merely said that the immune response was altered, but the data showed otherwise. Perhaps the paper would not have been published if it was too blunt, with too much vaccine reality  for modern medicine.

World Economic Forum Adviser Professor Sarah Harper, has said that the UK population collapse (which I note, is mainly of the white British population), is good, as the high-income, high-consuming countries of the world reducing the
number of children that they're having, will reduce consumption, and hence the carbon footprint. It is just the sort of woke thing a university professor today would say. But, the system is not content to just allow that to happen, and uses mass immigration to beef up the numbers. The migrants instantly consume at the same or greater levels than locals, so absolutely nothing is achieved. Of course, the Great Replacement goes on as usual, which is the raison d'etre of immigration.
https://dailysceptic.org/2023/08/20/u-k-population-collapse-good-for-the-planet-wef-adviser-prof-sarah-harper-explains/

“U.K. Population Collapse “Good for the Planet”, WEF Adviser Prof Sarah
Harper Explains

BY IGOR CHUDOV

Remember how depopulation was called a right-wing conspiracy theory?
Things have changed, and 'population collapse', which can no longer be
denied, is now good for us!

The Telegraph picked the perfect messenger to communicate the new way we
should think about population declines. A high-level WEF adviser tells us:

https://web.archive.org/web/20230817195336/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/08/17/20-year-low-for-baby-born-in-england-good-news-for-planet/


Oxford Professor Sarah Harper is a very important person. The Telegraph
article listing her credentials forgot to mention that she serves on the
Global Agenda Council on Ageing Societies of the World Economic Forum.

Prof Harper is thrilled about recent declines in fertility:

Prof Harper told the Telegraph: “I think it's a good thing that the
high-income, high-consuming countries of the world are reducing the
number of children that they're having. I'm quite positive about that.”

The academic said declining fertility in rich countries would help to
address the “general overconsumption that we have at the moment”, which
has a negative impact on the planet.

Most importantly, declines in births will bring about reductions in CO2
emissions from wealthy nations, Prof Harper points out:

Research has found that wealthy nations tend to have much larger carbon
footprints than poorer countries, as rich people can afford to buy more
goods, travel more and do other activities that generate emissions.

Carbon emissions from high-income countries were 29 times larger than
low-income countries on a per capita basis in 2020, World Bank figures show.

Population Declines or Population Replacement?

Here's the strange part: If the leadership of the World Economic Forum
wanted to reduce emissions from wealthy countries, I could understand
how they would hope that population reductions would lead to a decline
in economic output. Aside from moral implications, it is simple math
that fewer people means fewer cars on the road, less food consumed and
so on.

However, something entirely different is going on! While the population
of local-born natives is no longer reproducing at the levels needed to
maintain the population, new immigration picks up. It accounts for a
larger and larger share of births!

While the number of births in Britain is declining, the share of
children born to parents who immigrated from outside Britain has hit a
record high.

Almost one in three children born last year were delivered by mothers
born outside of the U.K. The number of births by women born outside the
U.K. rose 3,600 year-on-year to account for 30.3% of all births. The
previous peak was 29.3% in 2020.

When including the father, more than one in three children born last
year had at least one foreign-born parent. In London, the figure was two
thirds.

This development is inconsistent with wanting to reduce the populations
of high-consumption countries. It seems self-defeating to celebrate
birth reductions while simultaneously amping up the arrivals of new
immigrants who work hard to live well, consume a lot, have many children
and realise the 'British dream'.

It has long been suspected that the leading mainstream science journals have an agenda on climate change, to promote the alarmist position while claiming up front to be scientifically objective and neural. But, this has been put to the test and shown not to be true.

Here is an interesting human-interest story for the NO side on the Voice referendum. It involves a confrontation between an Aboriginal man, who supported NO, and some whites who were campaigning for the YES side, with a table at a supermarket in the far north NSW town of Mullumbimby. I am not exactly sure of what the Aboriginal man’s view is, but it seems to be something along the lines that the YES position is offensive to his tribe, as being an ancient people in this land, recognition in a constitution is somewhat offensive. I don’t agree, but accept the point. He also has the good sense to see how the New Class ethnic/race elites are behind this, what he calls coconuts, black/brown on the outside but white inside.