The Canadian evolutionary behavioural scientist Dr. Gad Saad has published a book entitled, The Saad Truth about Happiness. The book tackles one of the oldest philosophical problems, of what constitutes the good life and human happiness. Where the contemporary world differs from the world of ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle, who saw human happiness encompassing various elements of flourishing, as key aspects of that nature, such as intellectual fulfilment are satisfied, is that in the postmodern wasteland, such a nature is denied. Thus, the differences between males and females are rejected, and indeed, the concepts of a man and a woman become purely relative; hence the difficulties the radicals have in saying exactly what a woman is. The secure anchoring in human essence that Aristotle saw, is denied by those, and they dominate the world, those who champion the gender agender and transgenderism.

Conservatives have been found to be happier than liberals, because conservatives have a foundation of values, which those of the Left deny, where everything is open to deconstruction and destruction. Conservatives who are religious are the happiness of all, as they see that there is something beyond this world that gives ultimate meaning and sense to the buzzing confusion of present-day reality. Secular liberals, just live, and die. Sad, as Trump would say.

The globalist elites of the World Economic Forum have been recommending that governments get deadly serious on the so-called climate change issue, and start using the stick, penalties imposed by law, over the carrot, mere incentives, to reach the mythical state of net zero emissions. Thus, in the UK, there is a move now for new criminal offences to be created to deal with people who do not obey the new energy laws. London already has fines for vehicles found to exceed permissible emission levels of 12.5 pounds per offence, which is crippling many poor people who need a car for work and survival. This law is so draconian that people are flooding to buy old cars which have been given an exception under the London laws, and it is now difficult to get such cars, even at a high price.

But, things will not stop there. Under the new energy proposals, people who violate the regulations to reduce their energy consumption could face up to a year in prison and fines of up to £15,000! This is going to make it almost impossible for poor British families to heat their homes during the bitter cold of British winters. But the elites do not care if such people die; all that matters is their agenda.

Before we think about changing the Constitution, we should acknowledge that all constitutions are the sets of rules by which parliament, or even the local sporting club, will operate its business. They involve the procedures to be followed when conducting business. The rules are not the appropriate place to recognise the founders of the local sporting club, or for recognising nationally the people living in Australia before it was even called Australia. The proposed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice will instantly create division because it will favour that group over and above the rest of us. We are all recognised as Australians and hence have our “voice” to parliament. It is actioned by our member of parliament. That is the job of the MP! If the present funding directed toward the A&TSI people is not reaching the target then it is due for thorough overhaul. Importantly, this can be achieved without any special voice to parliament.

 I agree with Louis Cook (News, Monday, August 28). Do not tamper with our Constitution. Vote No!

The Aboriginal treaty agenda is not new, and was discussed by the Commonwealth Parliament back in 1983, and enthusiastically endorsed:

THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA TWO HUNDRED YEARS LATER ... Report by the Senate Standing Committee on Constitutional and Legal Affairs on the Feasibility of a Compact or 'Makarrata! between the Commonwealth and Aboriginal People:

The notion of Makarrata, arising from the YES side of the Voice referendum succeeding, will have profound consequences, more than even the critics have canvassed. First, consider what this concept entails. Literally the word is from Yolngu and means a spear penetrating the thigh (usually), of a person who has done wrong:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-10/makarrata-explainer-yolngu-word-more-than-synonym-for-treaty/8790452

Here is some first-hand material from The Australian on the fact that a treaty is an essential part of the Voice, and if it is passed, will be the next step. Every voter needs to know that this is not a symbolic gesture from the heart as the prime minister tells us, but the most profound and significant change to Australia’s legal frame work since federation. And, the elites want to sneak all this in under the radar, as usual. Don’t let them!

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/hero/treaty-and-truthtelling-explained-in-the-context-of-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/76d8fbb87ab5730533a5236be67d61aa

The Voice referendum is based upon the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Few voters have read this radical document which is almost a Critical Race Theory 101 essay, in woke Leftism and black arm band history. Consider material straight from the document:

https://ulurustatement.org/the-statement/

The White Rabbit Australia person has an excellent video deconstructing the Voice Truth Commission and “Makarrata,” which means treaty, among other things. The video should be passed to as many people as possible because it sums up concisely for ordinary people that the Voice is just the open door to a treaty, and vast reparations, and other horrors. The UN is right behind the Voice as its drive for the one world government of the New World Order.

The threat to private property, first seen in native title in the 1990s, and now giving to Aborigines 60 percent of the land mass of Australia, will be magnified. It is especially important to get this sort of damaging information out, since corporate Australia, and the globalists, will be tossing tens of millions of dollars to the Yes campaign, and it has begun.

Writing from the distance of the old country, I cannot but feel concern about the threat that Australians now face with the Voice referendum, and the massive backing to the YES side given by the globalists and corporate elites. It is clear, especially with the fast movement to the elimination of cash, that the Australian government is proceeding with a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), that Australia now is very much a testing ground for the next stage of the relentless march the globalist elites are making to the UN New World Order of one world government.

But, things in the EU may make the situation even worse, with the passage into law, if law it can be called, of the EU Digital Services Act. This will enable the Dark Lords of the EU to order Big Tech to censor any internet content that is considered to be “illegal,” “disinformation” or “hate speech.” The kicker here is that this includes content posted outside of the EU, including Australia, as someone in the EU may see it, and delicate snowflakes that they are, get triggered by it.

When you go to vote in the Voice referendum, there will be before you a single question, where people will be asked to vote Yes or No: “A Proposed Law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?”

So, millions of people will read this and think to themselves, if they think, well, what is the law, I can’t see anything? What is the law actually? And right they are. What goes into the Constitution is not the question, which would be nonsensical, even though that was what was voted on, but a new Chapter IX:

While the corporates are flooding the election area with money for the YES campaign, another great threat to the NO side comes from Big Tech censorship. It is predictable given the way Big Tech interfered in the 2020 US election. Now, Sky New Australia has uncovered that Meta/Facebook is engaging in an effort to censor the NO side. It is done by fact checkers, who are themselves checked by the Soros-funded International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), so right from the start there is a Left-wing bias. But even so, many of the fact checkers’ certifications have expired, so they are not qualified to do what they are doing, according to their paradigm.

Investigator Jack Houghton told Andrew Bolt on Sky News’s Bolt Report, ““They seem to be just targeting views of people who are against the Voice [referendum],” Houghton said. He later added that “All of the 17 Voice [referendum fact] checks were checking semantics, or slight verbal missteps or just comments from people who don't want the Voice to go ahead.” Highlighting the bias he added, “there was plenty of stuff on the yes side that could have been fact-checked.” He noted political leaders who made claims oversimplifying the legislative process.”

Dissent Right psychologist, Jordan Peterson has certainly got up the woke snouts of the Canadian establishment! But, the problem with living in such a tyrannical regime, and the US and Australia are only slightly, less worse, is that one will eventually get nailed by the establishment.

Dr Peterson was ordered to undergo re-education for some online comments. He took the matter to court, but, predictably enough, was ruled against. For making comments critical of the prime minister, a transgender surgery and the unnecessary severity of the Covid lockdowns, the court held that there was a moderate risk to the public of his comments! How exactly is there a risk, when the lockdowns led to harm to millions? The pot calls the kettle black, if that is not politically incorrect to say.

North Korea has recently conducted invasion of South Korea exercises, including the simulated use of nuclear strikes, raising the tensions even higher in the region. North Korea claims that this was a response to the Ulchi Freedom Shield annual military exercises, involving US and South Korean troops, even though it fires missiles over Japan whenever the urge strikes.

Conservative South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol, is so concerned about the nuclear threat from North Korea, that the president has aired the idea of South Korea developing a nuclear weapons program of its own, given South Korea’s lack of confidence in the Biden regime. And, with a neighbour like North Korea, who can blame South Korea? Thus, the world moves ever-closer to the inevitable first nuclear bomb of the 21^st century being exploded in warfare. Once the nuclear ice is broken, there will be a chain reaction, as nuclear powers in hostile relations across the world, settle scores with the ultimate fire cracker of doom.

At present the media, mostly in tht US, are whipping up concern about one particular Covid variant, “Pirola,” BA.2.86. It is named, for some odd reason after an asteroid near the planet Venus. This Covid variant is said to be of concern due to its alleged fast rate of mutations. The argument of the Covid mandate crowd is that these mutations just might be dangerous, and highly transmissible, hence overwhelming the health care system, so society needs to mask up now, and if necessary, lockdown once more. As well, the present number of Covid shots, up to six on more now, will not be adequate to deal with Pirola, so the new Big Pharma vax needs to be taken by everyone, as Joe Biden reminded the world. It is the same line that was run in Covid plandemic 1.0.

Dr Byram Bridle, a leading Covid mandate and vax critic, who like so many has been cancelled from his university, has given a detailed response to all the points the mainstream has made about Pirola. The details can be read below, but in summary, there is simply no solid evidence that Pirola has more deadly mutations than the relatively mild Covid viruses now floating around. Nor is it more transmissible than past Covid viruses. While it is true that the present vaccines are not likely to be effective against it, Dr Bridle points out that at present most people, vaxxed or unvaxxed, have has Covid. They will therefore have natural immunity, although there is the complication that some people may have vaccine-damaged immune systems. Dr Bridle concludes with a warning:

Two solid articles have recently appeared in The Australian, delivering a thump to the Voice, and an affirmation of the NO case, but warning of the dangers posed by the might assembled for the YES campaign. Robert Gottliebsen, “Modern CEOs have more money than sense when it comes to the Voice,”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/modern-ceos-have-more-money-than-sense-when-it-comes-to-the-voice/news-story/81fed615baf2ea68310efc21acd85857#:~:text=They%20conclude%20is%20that%20the,aims%20to%20achieve%20that%20agenda

addresses the issue of how the corporates will be tossing tens of millions of dollars to convince Australians to vote YES. Very few corporates, if any, are daring backing the No side, even though many have much to lose. He says; “Given the unprecedented sums being raised from the big corporations plus the unions, and combining with the pro-yes media and voting method decisions from the Electoral Commission, the ALP’s “yes” drive is in a wonderful position to win.” And, here is what is behind the voice as  Gottliebsen observes:

As linked below, the Leftist Guardian.com has done a moving human-interest story about how the present housing crisis in Australia impacts upon the most vulnerable of the population, in this case a 71-year-old woman who has been evicted. This contrasts with a piece from the less Leftist Conversation.com, entitled “Think curbing overseas migration will end the housing crisis? It won’t – and we can’t afford to do it." The article trots out the standard stuff, that Australia cannot cut immigration because of “muh skills crisis,” an eternal justification for unending immigration.

Dr Fauci rides again. Just when the issue of the Covid mandates resurfaces, he is out on the circuit proclaiming the public health virtues of the lockdowns, even though the published evidence is now against him, and he has made no attempt to address it. It goes to show, if you are wrong in this game, but on the establishment side, just double down on your errors!

Dr Mercola at a now-deleted piece wades in on the issue of the emerging Covid variants. Media reports are beginning a planned fear campaign, tht there are new Covid variants of concerns that the health authorities are deeply concerned about. The two variants are EG.5, Eris, and BA.2.86, Pirola, which the media is claiming may be hazardous due to potential mutations. Dr Mercola points out that even though there is no scientific evidence that these variants are a problem, the US seems to be gearing up for another round of lockdowns and mask mandates, just in time for the 2024 election.

The following information should be useful as an update on the Covid virus for Covid dissent activists in Australia.

I have speculated about false President Joe Biden’s remarks that he will ask the US Congress for funds for producing a Covid virus that works. And, everyone will get it. I was concerned that this could indicate a move to compulsion, perhaps using debanking this time as the lever. I have noticed that leading Covid vax critic Dr Malone has also thought that this could be the case. His remarks are below. This must be of concern to all of us, especially in the light of the World Health Organization’s coming pandemic treaty, to be finalised in May 2024, which is likely to make such a decision applicable to Australia as well.

As part of the climate change agenda, London has, thanks to Mayor Sadiq Khan, clean air cameras to combat climate change. What happens is that drivers who are considered to have polluting vehicles get fined 12.5 pounds daily. However, even the best made plans may strike a snag, as hundreds of cameras have been vandalised. While the cause of such actions may seem obvious, can we not propose, even in jest, that it is climate change itself making people do this, as according to the establishment, climate change can make people more violently. So, should the Mayor come down heavy on these “victims”?!

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40641-019-00121-2