Burying the Evidence: Covid Animal Studies By Brian Simpson
Our favourite Russian, Igor Chudov, makes sense of the Covid vax animal studies, which are in fact scientifically useless. The animals were killed soon after testing. This means that it was simply not possible to see if there were any longer-term adverse effects. Of course, the grand experiment is upon the majority of the human race, and as documented at the blog each day, this great disaster, a depopulation agenda, is unfolding rapidly.
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/covid-vaccine-test-animals-were-killed?
“A fact check, promoted by Twitter, attracted my attention. It said that there were NO SAFETY CONCERNS found in animal tests and trials of Covid vaccines:
I felt like I had to take a closer look. And I found something.
The fact check, fortunately, mentions three animal studies — one for each COVID vaccine — and I read each one closely. It turned out that in all three studies, experimenters killed the test animals shortly after vaccination and the subsequent challenge of animals with Sars-Cov-2. They killed them so as to make it impossible to find “safety signals” that arise in vaccinated beings post-vaccination in the long run.
This means, with all test animals dead, the scientists could not find out
- whether these animals could actually reproduce
- whether these animals had shortened lifespans
- what happens to the test animals upon COVID reinfections
- whether the test animals would be more likely to have cancers or other immune-mediated diseases
- whether the test animals were more likely to suffer from other species-specific illnesses
It is very convenient to kill test animals, because this way, vaccine companies could report that “they identified no safety concerns” — and it is kind of truthful! There are no safety concerns with dead animals!
What are these trials? They were mentioned right in the fact check.
Here are the links from above if you want to follow them:
The three vaccinated sentinel macaques who are reported above to NOT have been necropsied (killed), were kept for a short time to allow for a viral rechallenge, and were necropsied shortly after the study ended.
The article (and supplemental table S1) show that animals were all killed on the days 7, 8 and 14-15 after “viral challenge”. The goal was, ostensibly, to analyze their lungs. I totally agree with the need to analyze lungs, but why could they not have more macaques and follow their lives post-vaccination?
AstraZeneca vaccinated 20 hamsters and necropsied some on day 4 and some on Day 14.
Picture 7C leaves little doubt that the remaining hamsters were also necropsied, as it analyzes tissue samples from hearts, spleens, lungs, kidneys etc.
Cruelty to Humans?
In this article, I am not complaining about cruelty to animals. I am complaining about cruelty to humans, shown in these animal trials. All test animals were killed shortly after vaccination. Nobody was allowed to follow them up and see if they seem happy, if they reproduce, live out their lifespans healthily, etc.
The lab animals were promptly destroyed instead — perhaps to ensure that NO SAFETY SIGNAL EMERGED and so that fact-checkers can tell us that “there is nothing to see here”. I am not even touching the tiny sample sizes and the audacity of giving a novel treatment to thousands of people after testing it on a few hamsters or a dozen macaques.
That’s kind of cruel — and it is cruel to us, the target market for COVID vaccines.
Do you think that they could have followed up their test animals’s health at least until the end of human Covid vaccine trials? Is destroying all test animals trialled with a radically novel vaccine technology, a bit suspicious?
Comments