Brett Stevens on White Genocide By Chris Knight (Florida)
Here is a take on the theme of white genocide by Brett Stevens, who runs a controversial but highly interesting blog, Amerika.org, charting the philosophical and real decline of the West. There is always something provocative there.
http://www.amerika.org/politics/let-their-hatred-make-them-weak/
“Much of the internet seems up in arms over the fact that Leftists took the mask off and now openly call for White Genocide, starting with their declaration that Whiteness is bad:
“Whiteness is a condition one first acquires and then one has—a malignant, parasitic-like condition to which “white” people have a particular susceptibility. The condition is foundational, generating characteristic ways of being in one’s body, in one’s mind, and in one’s world. Parasitic Whiteness renders its hosts’ appetites voracious, insatiable, and perverse. These deformed appetites particularly target nonwhite peoples. Once established, these appetites are nearly impossible to eliminate. Effective treatment consists of a combination of psychic and social-historical interventions. Such interventions can reasonably aim only to reshape Whiteness’s infiltrated appetites—to reduce their intensity, redistribute their aims, and occasionally turn those aims toward the work of reparation. When remembered and represented, the ravages wreaked by the chronic condition can function either as warning (“never again”) or as temptation (“great again”). Memorialization alone, therefore, is no guarantee against regression. There is not yet a permanent cure.”
This is pure provocation. They want to make us rage. What does that tell us?
For starters, it says that they are not in control. If they were, they would not need this. Second, it says that they depend on our anger to keep us impotent; if we rage about how terrible this is and do nothing, they continue to win.
Finally, it tells us that they are caught in the paradox of their own belief systems. If you believe in equality and freedom, you believe in the right for people to choose their own neighbors, employees, friends, spouses, and business partners.
Let us break down the neurosis:
Whiteness is a condition one first acquires and then one has—a malignant, parasitic-like condition to which “white” people have a particular susceptibility.
Massive confusion arises in the need to assert a racial category (White) and then disclaim racial categories (“white”). This paradox obviously affects the thinking here, because the argument is that White people somehow become easily infected by this “condition” (read: belief).
The condition is foundational, generating characteristic ways of being in one’s body, in one’s mind, and in one’s world. Parasitic Whiteness renders its hosts’ appetites voracious, insatiable, and perverse. These deformed appetites particularly target nonwhite peoples.
Now the argument reveals itself: White people are prone to racism, says the man sitting on a world where most ethnic groups are at war with other ethnic groups at any given time, and most of them are non-White. Should we mention Rwanda here? What about Palestinians? Uyghurs? Tigray?
Once established, these appetites are nearly impossible to eliminate. Effective treatment consists of a combination of psychic and social-historical interventions. Such interventions can reasonably aim only to reshape Whiteness’s infiltrated appetites—to reduce their intensity, redistribute their aims, and occasionally turn those aims toward the work of reparation.
In other words, we must reprogram the beliefs of Whites to make them self-destructive, a.k.a. to kermit suicide by accepting demographic replacement, self-hatred, and ultimately, White Genocide.
Memorialization alone, therefore, is no guarantee against regression. There is not yet a permanent cure.
You cannot trust White people. You can only eliminate them. Hint hint, that’s what we want, and it must happen sooner rather than later.
Got it. Mask off. …
In pursuit of individualism, [Leftists] demand equality, which always (without exception) consists of taking from the strong to give to the weak.
That means that strong groups must be eliminated so that everyone else can be happily mediocre together. That is the socially correct answer, in that this way the group exists through compromise, but misses the underlying reality that human social thoughts are not reality, and reality is more important.
These people live in a fake world made of neurotic thoughts based in peer pressure and nothing more. They are what happens when a society gets wealthy and becomes a replacement for adaptation to reality.
Their hatred makes them weak. Good: we should encourage this. They have become raving lunatics preaching rage and scapegoating, where we offer a way out of not just the ruined society they have produced, but the schizoid delirium of their pathology.”
On similar theme, we can work this one in as well, more paradoxes of wokeness:
“A planned movie built around the response of Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern to a gunman’s slaughter of Muslim worshippers drew criticism in New Zealand on Friday for displaying “white saviorism” while ignoring the victims.
Australian actor Rose Byrne (pictured, left) is set to play Ardern (pictured, right) in the movie They Are Us. The Hollywood Reporter revealed FilmNation Entertainment intends to bring it to the Cannes Virtual Market later this month.
The movie would be set in the days after the 2019 attacks in which 51 people were killed at two Christchurch mosques. The title of the film draws on Ardern’s speech addressing the slaughter.
At the time of the tragedy, Ardern was praised for her response but the prospect of a movie focused purely on her has many in New Zealand raising concerns about the plans.
On social media, the hashtag #TheyAreUsShutdown began to trend in New Zealand as survivors, Muslims, writers, and activists reacted to the project.
AP reports Aya Al-Umari, whose older brother Hussein was killed in the attacks, wrote on Twitter simply “Yeah nah.”
Abdigani Ali, a spokesperson for the Muslim Association of Canterbury, said the community recognized the story of the attacks needed to be told “but we would want to ensure that it’s done in an appropriate, authentic, and sensitive matter.”
A petition was also launched to bring the project to an end.
Tina Ngata, an author and advocate, was more blunt, tweeting that the slaughter of Muslims should not be the backdrop for a film about “white woman strength. COME ON.”
Also on Twitter, Mohamed Hassan, an award-winning New Zealand journalist and poet and host of The Guest House — a podcast that explores how Muslims made sense of the Christchurch mosque attacks — tweeted the filmmakers did not have the right to “turn this into a White Saviour narrative.”
Ardern’s office said in a brief statement the prime minister and her government have no involvement with the movie.”
Ok, fair enough. And while we are on the subject of feminists, just cop this, from The Game of Thrones star:
“Game of Thrones star Emilia Clarke is debuting a comic book series about a single mother whose superpowers manifest from her menstrual cycle.
M.O.M.: Mother of Madness introduces on Maya, a busy single parent whose life is turned upside down by the discovery of the superpowers she gets from her period, according to a report by Variety.
“She’s so ashamed of her powers at the start. It’s mental,” Clarke explained of the comic book, which aims to celebrate the single mom, who is typically depicted as someone who is sad, struggling, and seeking a man, Variety reports.
“She’s a single mum that’s got to get sh*t done,” the actress elaborated. “This was born from the idea that single mothers are superheroes. You need superhuman strength to do that. When you get into your 30s and your friends start having kids, you’re like, ‘Oh my god. I was not aware of what it took. Holy sh*t.'”
“The bloating, the hair growth, the mood swings, the [acne], all of it. We hate that when it happens, speaking for myself and everyone I’ve ever met who has had a period,” Clarke said. “What if we turned that around and made the period something that we can feel as this unique, crazy, superhuman thing that happens in our body?”
“When Maya is scared, she goes invisible, when she’s angry, she has superhuman strength,” she added. “She can swing like Spider-Man from her armpit hair.”
In upcoming editions of the three-part comic miniseries, Maya will use her “inflated boobs” to help thwart a human trafficking ring, the report adds.
Clarke — who says she read comic books as kid — recounts that she got the idea after realizing that the comic book industry is heavily male-dominated, despite about half of comic book buyers being female.
“In doing my research, I found that 16% of comic book creators are female, according to a 2019 study, and only 30% of comic book characters are women,” she said. “On the other hand, roughly half of comic book buyers are female — something did not sit right with me in that exchange, and all these signs were telling me to go make my own.”
All this, at the end of the day, is enough to make one so world weary, that even one’s impending genocide looks like a relief!
Comments