Big Tech Interferes with Elections More than Russia Could By Chris Knight

     Forgive me, but whenever I hear about election interfering, I think of paedophiles doing the dark deeds that they do. You know, that includes these establishment types:
  https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/grand-jury-report-about-catholic-priest-abuse-pennsylvania-shows-church-ncna900906
  http://www2.philly.com/philly/opinion/commentary/statute-of-limitations-child-sexual-abuse-catholic-church-delaware-pennsylvania-20180918.html 
  https://www.phillyvoice.com/catholic-churchs-grim-history-ignoring-priestly-pedophilia-and-silencing-would-be-whistleblowers/

     However, while Big Tech has moved to censor everybody they don’t like, and the Democrats are still playing the record “Russia gave the election to Trump by exposing our dark and nefarious deeds,” in reality, Big Tech wanted Hillary Clinton in to push their globalist agenda, and worked at it:
  https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/10/silent-donation-corporate-emails-reveal-google-executives-efforts-to-swing-election-to-hillary-clinton-with-latino-outreach-campaign/

“An email chain among senior Google executives from the day after the 2016 presidential election reveals the company tried to influence the 2016 United States presidential election on behalf of one candidate, Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton. In the emails, a Google executive describes efforts to pay for free rides for a certain sect of the population to the polls–a get-out-the-vote for Hispanic voters operation–and how these efforts were because she thought it would help Hillary Clinton win the general election in 2016. She also used the term “silent donation” to describe Google’s contribution to the effort to elect Clinton president. The main email, headlined, “Election results and the Latino vote,” was sent on Nov. 9, 2016—the day after Clinton’s loss to Trump in the 2016 presidential election—by Eliana Murillo, Google’s Multicultural Marketing department head.

The four page email begins with Murillo claiming she and others at Google were engaged in non-partisan activities not designed to help any one candidate or another—only to undercut her own commentary in later passages in the emails by openly admitting the entire effort to boost Latino turnout using Google products with official company resources was to elect Clinton over Trump. The critical miscalculation, Murillo wrote in a stunning admission in the email, was that Latino voters backed Trump by higher margins than any experts had forecast in the lead-up to the election. Trump’s 29 percent among Hispanics nationally blew prognosticators away, and he hit even higher numbers—about 31 percent—in the key battleground state of Florida, Murillo admitted.”

     President Donald Duck, the last president before America becomes a colony of Mexico, does nothing, hiding in the White House, hoping and praying that he will be left alone long enough to finish the tasks the globalists have assigned him, while eating junk food. What other explanation is there for his pathetic performance?