Big Australia’s Mass Migration Great Replacement, Back in Business! By James Reed
It had to happen. Covid tyranny had one good thing, and that was slowing down the Great Replacement of traditional white Australians by migrants, but now Big Business Australia, which wants a population for Australia of 100 million plus, is getting its way. The immigration tap is being turned on, with 300, 000 people this year, and who knows what in the next. The elites hope to get to a “high migration scenario” of 470,000 +++ a year, so that by 2060 Australia’s population would then reach at least 49.3 million. Most migrants now are non-white, mainly Han Chinese and a lesser number of Indians. Australia will be majority non-white long before 2060, maybe 2050, or 2040. I do not see how any of the present things of Australian conservatives will survive. Economic and political reform in a majority Chinese Australia? I don’t think so. The culture changes. The monarchy? Certainly not a British one.
“Australia is on track for net migration of more than 300,000 people this year, more than 25% higher than Treasury forecasts, due to a surge in arrivals, according to a former top immigration official.
Abul Rizvi, the former deputy secretary of the immigration department, said that Treasury forecasts of a 235,000-person annual boost to population from migration – the long term pre-pandemic average – have “significantly underestimated” net figures.
Rizvi’s intervention comes as the treasurer, Jim Chalmers, signalled the government could adopt a proposal from the Business Council of Australia for permanent migration to be set as a percentage of the total population, automatically raising the current cap of 195,000.
Asked about the BCA submission to the migration review on Friday, Chalmers told Radio National he is “personally up for” a conversation about “if there is a way that we can streamline some of these processes to get the right mix at the same time as we recognise that migration’s not a substitute training”.
The October budget forecast net overseas migration of 235,000 both in 2022-23 and 2023-24, which it explains is based on an assumption that migration will “continue in line with pre-pandemic trends”.
The government’s population statement, released on Friday, further explained this figure is “derived using a 14-year average from 2004–05 to 2017–18”.
The estimate is composed of 190,000 permanent migrants and 13,750 humanitarian migrants entering Australia a year, plus 66,000 “temporary migrants who reside in Australia for several years but never transition to permanent residence”, less 20,000 permanent residents and 15,000 Australian citizens who emigrate.
But Rizvi told Guardian Australia that actual arrivals in the year to date are much higher than those estimates and that “because of this factor alone Treasury has underestimated net migration”.
Rizvi cited data, published by the Australian Bureau of Statistics in December, which showed that arrivals outstripped departures in October by almost 200,000.
“If you have a large excess of visitor arrivals over departures, a substantial proportion are going to end up as net migration,” he said.
In October alone there were 1.2 million arrivals and 1 million departures. A surge of 430,470 short-term visitors arrived, dwarfing the 360,460 who departed. Similarly, 721,860 Australian citizens arrived for the short-term, more than the 609,160 people who departed.
“Treasury are assuming net migration will be 235,000 but I think it is on track for well over 300,000 this year,” Rizvi said.
“I’ve never seen anything like this in 30 years – it’s out of the realm of anything we’ve seen before,” he added, referring to the excess of arrivals over departures.
The exact figure is unknown because the final net migration figure will not be determined until next financial year and it is still unclear what portion of temporary visits will be extended by further visa grants.
In the 11 months to November 2022, Rizvi said there was an “unprecedented excess of visitor arrivals over departures of 340,000” and this was “likely to grow further in December 2022” when the latest ABS figures are released next week.
“In 2019, 71% of excess visitor arrivals contributed to net migration. In 2018, it was around 40% and in 2017, it was 70%.”
Even applying a conservative estimate of 40% of that cohort remaining, or 136,000 people, would more than double Treasury’s estimate of 66,000 temporary visitors contributing to net migration in 2022-23.
Rizvi suggested the surge in arrivals may be driven in part by parents and other relatives visiting Australia temporarily while waiting for a more permanent visa.
“Also, with the labour market being as strong as it is people have arrived, finding alternatives such as a student visa, which is now effectively a work visa, or applying onshore for a working holiday visa.”
The Centre for Population’s statement projected that with net migration of 235,000 a year, Australia would reach a population of 39.2 million in 2060-61, signalling a smaller population than forecast and older on average due to the impacts of the pandemic and the global Covid shutdown.
But under a “high migration scenario” of 470,000 a year, Australia’s population would reach 49.3 million in that time, with a younger median age (41) than the baseline scenario (42.8).
The statement noted “significant uncertainties” in projecting migration patterns, including the “upside risk” of fewer people leaving Australia than forecast and the “downside risk” that more might leave.
Student numbers, in particular, were sensitive to “movement restrictions in student source countries”, it said.”
Comments