Ballot Fraud Study Confirms 2020 Victory for Trump! By Chris Knight (Florida)

While it is hard times for Donald Trump with present lawfare judgments against him by biased judges and juries, one big story that did not see the light of day in the mainstream media, was the report that Trump most likely won the 2020 election. This was a ballot fraud study by the Heartland institute. They concluded that: "After analyzing the raw survey data, we were able to conclude that 28.2% of respondents who voted by mail admitted to committing at least one kind of voter fraud." These votes should have been rejected. The study concluded "If the mail-in fraud levels were between 4% and 5%, then Trump wins enough of the swing states to actually force a tie at the electoral college."

Assuming Trump gets elected in November this year, and is not assassinated, he faces the difficulty that many laws and regulations are being made so he cannot undo them by executive order, or so the elite think. However, if it can be officially established that the 2020 election was fraudulent, then there is a case for declaring all the executive orders by Joe Biden, however seemingly binding, as null and void. And, there needs to be a full exposure of everything the Democrats were doing in the most corrupt country in Europe, the Ukraine. Blow the lid off of everything, Trump has nothing to lose now.

https://vigilantfox.substack.com/p/ballot-fraud-study-concludes-trump

"A new ballot fraud study has concluded that Trump "almost certainly" won the 2020 election.

Despite claims by a DHS subagency that the 2020 election was the "most secure in American history," the Heartland Institute's study suggests otherwise.

The authors wrote, "After analyzing the raw survey data, we were able to conclude that 28.2% of respondents who voted by mail admitted to committing at least one kind of voter fraud."

Those votes should have been thrown out.

The authors also noted, "If the mail-in fraud levels were between 4% and 5%, then Trump wins enough of the swing states to actually force a tie at the electoral college."

But don't forget – the survey analysis that this was based on had about 28% of the respondents admitting to at least one kind of ballot fraud.

This is well beyond the 6% threshold. Trump won.

Guest post by Tom Ozimek

A new study examining the likely impact that fraudulent mail-in ballots had in the 2020 election concludes that the outcome would "almost certainly" have been different without the massive expansion of voting by mail.

The Heartland Institute study tried to gauge the probable impact that fraudulent mail-in ballots cast for both then-candidate Joe Biden and his opponent, President Donald Trump, would have had on the overall 2020 election results.

The study was based on data obtained from a Heartland/Rasmussen survey in December that revealed that roughly one in five mail-in voters admitted to potentially fraudulent actions in the presidential election.

After the researchers carried out additional analyses of the data, they concluded that mail-in ballot fraud "significantly" impacted the 2020 presidential election.

They also found that, absent the huge expansion of mail-in ballots during the pandemic, which was often done without legislative approval, President Trump would most likely have won.

"Had the 2020 election been conducted like every national election has been over the past two centuries, wherein the vast majority of voters cast ballots in-person rather than by mail, Donald Trump would have almost certainly been re-elected," the report's authors wrote.

Over 43 percent of 2020 votes were cast by mail, the highest percentage in U.S. history.

The new study examined raw data from the December survey carried out jointly between Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports, which tried to assess the level of fraudulent voting that took place in 2020.

The December survey, which President Trump called "the biggest story of the year," suggested that roughly 20 percent of mail-in voters engaged in at least one potentially fraudulent action in the 2020 election, such as voting in a state where they're no longer permanent residents.

In the new study, Heartland analysts say that, after reviewing the raw survey data, subjecting it to additional statistical treatment and more thorough analysis, they now believe they can conclude that 28.2 percent of respondents who voted by mail committed at least one type of behavior that is "under most circumstances, illegal" and so potentially amounts to voter fraud.

"This means that more than one-in-four ballots cast by mail in 2020 were likely cast fraudulently, and thus should not have been counted," the researchers wrote.

A Heartland Institute research editor and research fellow who was involved in the study explained to The Epoch Times in a telephone interview that there are narrow exceptions where a surveyed behavior may be legal, like filling out a mail-in ballot on behalf of another voter if that person is blind, illiterate, or disabled, and requests assistance.

However, the research fellow, Jack McPherrin, said such cases were within the margin of error and not statistically significant.

In addition to reassessing the likely overall degree of fraudulent mail-in ballots in the 2020 election, Heartland analysts calculated the potential impact that fraudulent mail-in ballots might have produced in the six key swing states that President Trump officially lost.

This, then, was used to determine the impact of potentially fraudulent mail-in ballots on the overall 2020 election result.

First, the researchers analyzed the electoral results for the six swing states—Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—under the 28.2 percent fraudulent mail-in ballot scenario that they estimated based on the raw survey data.

Then they calculated the electoral results in the six states under the different scenarios, each with a lower assumed percentage of fraudulent ballots, ranging from 28.2 percent all the way down to 1 percent.

For each of the 29 scenarios that they assesses, the researchers calculated the estimated number of fraudulent ballots, which were then subtracted from overall 2020 vote totals to generate a new estimate for vote totals.

Overall, of the 29 different scenarios presented in the study, the researchers concluded that President Trump would have won the 2020 election in all but three."

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/mail-in-ballot-fraud-study-finds-trump-almost-certainly-won-in-2020-post-5583575?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=partner&src_cmp=vigilantf