Australia Openly Speaking of the New World Order By Bruce Bennett
Talk about “hazzards”! Have a look at the American coverage of what is going down in Australia re Covid lockdowns and general social freak-out. There seems to be explicit mention that this is the “New World Order.” Now why would our rulers use that turn of phrase? Isn’t that something people like us fringe dwellers would use? I can only speculate.
“Disturbing footage out of Australia shows a New Wales’ MP declare the beginning of the “New World Order” as the government locks down the country over COVID once again.
New Wales Minister for Health and Medical Research Brad Hazzard dismissed lockdown concerns as “just the way it is,” claiming citizens must “accept” this “New World Order” paradigm.
“This is a world pandemic,” Hazzard said Saturday. “It’s a one in 100-year event. So you can expect that we will have transmission from time to time, and that’s just the way it is.”
“We’ve got to accept that this is the New World Order.”
As part of the “New World Order” model, the following measures have been imposed upon Australian citizens:
- Outdoor gatherings limited to 2 people
- Exercise permitted no farther than 10km away from home
- Browsing shops forbidden
- 1 person in household allowed to shop for essentials
- Funeral limited to 10 people
If that sounds unreasonable and authoritarian, that’s because it is.
In fact, Australia recorded its first COVID death of 2021 just last week.
So 1 person dies, and now a country of over 25 million must be locked down forever.
Welcome to the New World Order’s Great Reset agenda.”
We even have our new version of the “grim reaper” ads. These old ads were terrifically scary with little kiddies getting bowelled down by AIDS bowling balls, which happened, didn’t it? The campaign was not for vaccines, there is apparently none yet for AIDs, but for safe sex, so targeting kiddies of about three years of age made a lot of sense at the time.
“Australians have condemned a government commercial which shows a young woman in hospital desperately trying to breathe as a warning to get vaccinated, with many pointing out that those in her age group cannot yet book a jab.
The graphic ad, which is set to run in Sydney – the largest city in Australia, and the one hit hardest by Covid – shows the woman panting with tears in her eyes as she is hooked up to a respirator in hospital. “Covid-19 can affect anyone. Stay home. Get tested. Book your vaccination,” the ad concludes.
Many Australians were quick to criticize what they deemed to be an inappropriate government ad, given Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s failure to secure enough Covid-19 vaccines for the entire population, and recent coronavirus blunders.
“Completely offensive to run an ad like this when Australians in this age group are still waiting for their bloody vaccinations,” protested 10 News First’s National Affairs Editor Hugh Riminton, while Guardian Australia’s Associate News Editor Josephine Tovey called the ad an “insult.”
One social media user described “everything about” the ad as “insensitive and offensive,” while Australian author Anna Spargo-Ryan declared, “How dare the government put the blame for this back on the individual. They’ve stumbled at every possible systemic hurdle: forced poverty, vaccine scarcity, vaccine hesitancy, hotel quarantine…”
Though Australia has been one of the countries least affected by Covid-19, the spread of the Delta variant and the Australian government’s failure to purchase enough vaccines has led to an increase in cases and concern that the country is far less prepared to combat the virus than others.
Morrison has defended the Australian government’s vaccination rollout, claiming it is only a few months behind schedule and saying a more advanced vaccine rollout would not have stopped cases from rising in Sydney.
According to the Australian Department of Health, only those aged 40 and above are currently eligible for vaccination, with an exception for Aboriginal people, carers, critical workers, and other vulnerable people or people in close proximity to the vulnerable.
Australians aged 18 and above are permitted to receive the AstraZeneca vaccine if a medical professional approves, but most countries have warned against the distribution of AstraZeneca’s vaccine to young people due to concerns over its side effects, which can include rare potentially deadly blood clotting.
Morrison was lambasted this past week after it was reported that the government had secured a “game-changing deal” with Pfizer for vaccines, only for Pfizer to come out and reveal that the number of doses being sent to Australia had not changed. Some Pfizer doses will, however, arrive in Australia sooner.
Morrison was also criticized after he appeared to suggest that the UK had vaccinated the majority of its population with AstraZeneca and not Pfizer or Moderna, when in fact the UK commonly uses all three, with only Pfizer and Moderna used for under 40s. The UK is also preparing to use Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine later this year.”
All this can be read against this report, which I take a neutral position on, merely reporting news:
“As TFTP has reported over the last several months, a record number of adverse reactions have been reported to the Centers for Disease Control’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The most recent numbers show thousands of adverse events reported from the new age group of 12-17 year old children who are now receiving the vaccine — with 623 reports of myocarditis or pericarditis among people ages 30 and younger who received COVID-19 vaccine.
According to the CDC, from December 14, 2020, through June 7, 2021, VAERS received 5,208 reports of death (0.0017%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine.
As the Free Thought Project has stated from the beginning, as not to set off the “fact checkers” it is important to point out that just because data is submitted to the CDC through VAERS, this does not in anyway mean that these reactions are directly related to the COVID-19 vaccine.
However, we’ve seen folks attempt to dismiss the number of reports, claiming they know there is nothing related or that they are being made by fake accounts or by folks attempting to manipulate the data to make the vaccine companies look bad. It is indeed true, according to the CDC that “anyone can file a report in the system.” However, filing a false VAERS report intentionally is a violation of federal law punishable by fine and imprisonment.
That being said, a medical research group in England has found a similar trend in the United Kingdom’s reporting system for adverse events, called Yellow Card. Like the VAERS system, the UK government encourages people to “report suspected side effects to medicines, vaccines or medical device and diagnostic adverse incidents used in coronavirus treatment to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency to ensure safe and effective use.”
The group of scientists and doctors at the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy (EBMC) in Bath, UK has examined the data reported to Yellow Card and has found a startling trend.
The director of the EMBC, the renowned Dr. Tess Lawrie wrote to the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) with concerns over the data gleaned from Yellow Card.
In her letter to the MHRA, Lawrie points out that between January 4, 2021 and May 26, 2021 a total of 1,253 deaths and 888,196 adverse events were reported, which like the CDC data aren’t directly proven as correlated with the vaccine process but were reported as such. Nonetheless, Lawrie and the EMBC have concerns for the safety of those receiving the vaccine.
Like the CDC data, the sheer number of reports of adverse reactions — which have surpassed the last 20 years of all adverse reactions reported for all vaccines, combined — are raising serious concerns among doctors and scientists.
In an interview with TrialSiteNews.com, Lawrie said “the total number of cases is concerning and that each person that’s reported should be followed up on to ensure there are no further problems. The scope of morbidity,” Lawrie declared, “is striking, evidencing a lot of incidents and what amounts to a large number of ill.”
Lawrie told TrialSite the system is incredibly “opaque”, that is, not transparent. She shared that the researchers aren’t able to cross-reference safety incidents by age, gender, or other data attributes. She estimates that in the UK about 60%+ of all vaccines are AstraZeneca’s while the remainder from the mRNA-based Pfizer vaccine.
While there is not a direct correlation, EMBC’s letter to the MHRA states that “the MHRA now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans.”
The letter concludes with an ominous warning, stating that “Preparation should be made to scale up humanitarian efforts to assist those harmed by the COVID-19 vaccines and to anticipate and ameliorate medium to longer term effects. As the mechanism for harms from the vaccines appears to be similar to COVID-19 itself, this includes engaging with numerous international doctors and scientists with expertise in successfully treating COVID-19.
“There are at least 3 urgent questions that need to be answered by the MHRA:
How many people have died within 28 days of vaccination?
How many people have been hospitalised within 28 days of vaccination?
How many people have been disabled by the vaccination?”
In the meantime, instead of investigating these legitimate concerns, governments have taken to issuing bribes and mandates in order to increase vaccine uptake.”
Now that really is stuff you do not see in the mainstream press.
Comments