Adventures in Anti-Whiteism, the New Woke Religion By James Reed
With covering the Covid plandemic and the slide into World War III, I have not had the time nor energy to report on the latest woke/politically correct absurdities from the universities. But they are going on, even as we speak. Here from The College Fix.com are some of the latest, that in essence all involve some tenured academic whinging about how whites and/or white culture needs to be cancelled, for “muh oppression.” But, carry it all through to the logical conclusion and first cancel the places where all of this culture of criticism comes from, the universities. How can a professor with a paid job at a university, by definition elitist centres of white oppression (actually oppression of whites), and at an absolute minimum offering shelter from the elements, complain about nothing to lose, when masses of homeless people, many white, sleep rough in the streets? Perhaps academics need to join their people in their environment?
“The job I try to accomplish in my writings is to try to get people to embrace the hopelessness and realize we have nothing to lose,’ Professor Miguel De La Torre said
Carlow University recently hosted an event on “Rejecting White Christianity” that featured a speaker who argued white people should “crucify their whiteness,” called for the embrace of “hopelessness,” and urged people to “ethically lie” to make right for past wrongs.
The speech prompted a Catholic watchdog group to protest the event as antithetical to the Pittsburgh-based private Catholic university’s identity.
The March 3 event was sponsored by Carlow’s Atkins Center for Ethics and featured Miguel De La Torre, professor of social ethics and Latinx studies at the Iliff School of Theology in Denver, Colorado.
De La Torre began his presentation by lambasting evangelicals who voted for Donald Trump, according to a video of the speech.
“When eight out of ten white evangelicals voted for a person who is completely against everything Christianity stands for, I don’t know what Christianity they are practicing,” he said. “But I want nothing to do with that Christianity.”
He then distinguished “white theology and ethics” from “Latinx ethics” and noted that the term white does not refer to skin pigmentation but is an “ontological concept.”
“Those of us who are colored, some of us can also be white. But the good news is there is salvation,” he said. Later, he explained that this salvation means “we [who are colored] have to crucify our colonized minds, and for our white brothers and sisters, they need to crucify their whiteness.”
Torre’s speech focused on the idea of “hope,” which he rejected and characterized as a white concept.
“We embrace Euro-centric concepts like hope because it helps to pacify the oppressed during their oppression,” he said. “It leads to spiritual liberation, and ignores physical liberation.”
Raising the possible objection that hope is a “gift of the spirit,” De La Torre said his definition of hope is different.
“I’m defining hope through my own Latino roots. In Spanish, hope is esperanza, esperanza comes from the word esperar, which means ‘to wait.’ And we’re not quite sure what we’re waiting for, or how long we’re waiting for—and what we’re waiting for may never come. This hope in Spanish does not mean the same thing in English.”
He called hope “a middle-class excuse to do nothing.”
While De La Torre rejected a definition of hope that involves waiting, hope in the Bible is often tied to waiting. Specifically, as Psalm 130:5 states, it is tied to waiting on God:
“I wait for the Lord, my whole being waits, and in his word I put my hope.”
The Apostle Paul also rooted the concept of hope in salvation through Christ’s atoning death on the cross for sin, declaring that this hope “does not put us to shame.” He wrote in Romans 5:2-5:
“Through him we have also obtained access by faith into this grace in which we stand, and we rejoiced in hope of the glory of God. Not only that, but we rejoice in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, and endurance produces character, and character produces hope, and hope does not put us to shame, because God’s love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us.”
But De La Torre argued that true character—understanding systemic oppression—produces hopelessness. He concluded his talk by urging the audience to realize that “embracing hopelessness is to be propelled forward into practice and action.”
Action for De La Torre means using what he called a “trickster ethic” to transform society.
The ethic covers things like “how to ethically lie so we can discover what is true, how to ethically steal so we can feed those who are hungry…[and] how to disrupt the structures that have trained us to oppress ourselves and to take upon our body our own discipline,” he said.
“This empire was built on stolen resources and cheap labor,” De La Torre said. “So hospitality is really the wrong word. What we need is restitution…By seeing this dilemma through the eyes of the margin, we come to a very different understanding of what the Christian response should be.”
Where is God in all of this? De La Torre answered the question by saying he is “not a theologian” and is therefore more interested in “dealing with what’s going on than trying to figure out the theology.”
De La Torre’s “rejection of what he calls ‘white Christianity’ is a rejection of Catholicism,” Domenick Galatolo wrote for TFP Student Action. “He advocates the overturning of order and morals by violent means.”
De La Torre did not respond to a request for comment from The College Fix.
Carlow bills itself as a “private, co-educational, Catholic liberal arts university” with a “strong commitment to social justice, ethical forward-thinking leadership and meaningful service to the community that makes an impact.”
Sean McFarland, Carlow University Public Relations & Communications Manager, told The College Fix that “viewpoints of lecturers should not be taken as either an endorsement or opposition of how the University feels about a particular issue.”
“Rather, the intent of our university’s liberal arts tradition is to expose students to a variety of worldly perspectives and encourage them to think critically and individually on how they feel about the topic(s) in question,” McFarland said.
“Carlow University is proud of our Catholic heritage and mercy mission, which welcomes all. As such, the University welcomes respectful discourse and multiple perspectives, including being open to hosting speakers like Dr. De La Torre whose topic may engender thoughtful reflection and dialogue.”
https://www.thecollegefix.com/vanderbilt-professor-delivers-dying-of-whiteness-lecture-at-cornell/
“Racist whites don’t want free healthcare because it helps minorities, professor says
A Vanderbilt University professor delivered a speech called “Dying of Whiteness: How the Politics of Racial Resentment Shaped the American Pandemic” at Cornell University on March 29.
Professor Jonathan Metzl authored a book called “Dying of Whiteness.”
He told the audience at the Ivy League school that he wanted to write a “warning” about the decisions made by white Republican voters, and to “warn people” that society needed to address these issues.
Most of his lecture was spent discussing his book and how the debates over healthcare were viewed in the COVID outbreak.
“Dying of Whiteness is a book about really the health effects of undermining public trust in institutions, in infrastructure, in expertise, in forms of knowledge,” Metzl said.
Metzl said that breakdowns in society, including around people’s decision not to wear a face mask during the COVID outbreak, were “flamed or obscured by racial tensions.”
Metzl did not respond to two emails sent in the past weeks from The College Fix.
The Fix asked if any other racial groups vote against their interests and for a definition of “whiteness,” but did not receive a response.
“When I say whiteness, I don’t mean there are some genetics or biology of whiteness, there are many different ways of being white,” Metzl said during his talk.
Metzl said that political views became the identity of white Republicans, citing “the rise” of “anti-government, anti-immigrant, pro-gun” views.
Politically conservative groups, such as the Tea Party and the Freedom Caucus in the U.S. House are “racialized movements” and “economic movements” with the goal to “defund local and state governments and then the federal government.”
Metzl, who referred to himself as a “race scholar” said the rise of the Tea Party made communities more dangerous, because “communal spaces” were defunded and the National Rifle Association and aligned legislators made it easier to access guns.
“The Tea Party took over, the anti-tax party took over … what happened was, when you start defunding stuff, taking money out of stuff … communal spaces [are removed]” Metzl said. These are the places where community members learn about one another.
“If you defund these public spaces and you also flood a lot of guns into the zone, all of a sudden people stop engaging with one another,” the Vanderbilt professor said in his talk.
Metzl shared that many people, including “staunch Republicans,” would say they supported health care reform, though he was careful in his focus groups not to refer to it as Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act. He said they held these views until they learned it would benefit poorer people or black people.
“Everybody supported it,” Metzl said, when he was doing focus groups. Then the “disinformation machine took over” which “tells you that it’s a government intrusion into your lives.”
“All of a sudden these Obama witch care doctor racist posters started showing up at Tea Party rallies,” Metzl said.
Opponents of Obamacare relied on a racist strategy, Metzl says
The Vanderbilt professor again identified race as a motivating factor driving the opposition to the healthcare overhaul law.
He said there is a “regular playbook” used in the South to generate opposition that involves the same three slogans – “Government intrusion into your lives, “affront on your freedom and liberty” and “black people are going to cut in line to take resources meant for you.”
While poor black men would support the legislation because it would help society and keep costs down, poor white men would oppose it, Metzl said.
“The language they used was so incredibly different,” the professor said, and shared one example of a line of reasoning he heard frequently.
“I know this program might help me … but I’m not going to join a system that’s going to benefit undeserving others …undeserving immigrants or minorities,” Metzl recounted. He added that he saw people dying of “real, biological illness” and an “untreated medical illness” but also they were dying of whiteness.
“They were also dying of an ideology, an ideology that told them there were privileges due to them as white Americans,” he said.”
Comments