A Titanic Conspiracy, By James Reed
The conspiracy theory that the RMS Titanic and its near-identical sister ship, the RMS Olympic, were secretly switched prior to the 1912 disaster as part of an insurance fraud scheme has been around since at least the late 1990s, when it was popularised by author Robin Gardiner in his book Titanic: The Ship That Never Sank? John Hamer's 2013 book RMS Olympic builds on and expands this idea, arguing that the Olympic, damaged in a high-profile collision with the HMS Hawke in September 1911, which led to costly repairs and potential uninsurability, was disguised as the Titanic and deliberately sunk in the North Atlantic to allow White Star Line (part of J.P. Morgan's International Mercantile Marine empire) to collect insurance money and avoid financial ruin. According to the book, the real Titanic was then repainted and repurposed as the Olympic, continuing to sail profitably for years afterward. Hamer frames this as a deliberate hoax orchestrated by powerful financial interests, emphasising that it doesn't deny the tragic loss of life, but reframes the official narrative as a cover-up. He presents a mix of historical facts, timelines of events, and what he describes as "compelling evidence" from shipping records, photographs, and inconsistencies in the ships' documented histories to support the switch, invoking Sherlock Holmes' logic of eliminating the impossible to arrive at the improbable truth. Endorsements, like the one from researcher G. Edward Griffin in the book's blurb, highlight the theory's apparent persuasiveness.
While Hamer's book does make a case for the theory, drawing on coincidences such as the ships' visual similarities, the timing of Olympic's repairs overlapping with Titanic's final outfitting, and White Star's financial pressures, it relies heavily on circumstantial claims rather than direct proof. Proponents, including Hamer, point to:
Photographic discrepancies, like variations in porthole counts or arrangements on the hulls of the two ships in pre-voyage images, suggesting a rushed swap.
The Olympic's post-1911 damage making it a "write-off" for insurers, while the Titanic was underinsured at only $5 million against a $7.5 million build cost, creating motive for fraud to recoup losses.
Survivor accounts and wreck details that allegedly match Olympic's modifications more than Titanic's original design.
Broader context of J.P. Morgan's influence, including theories tying the sinking to eliminating wealthy opponents of the Federal Reserve (though Hamer focuses more on the insurance angle).
However, the theory has been thoroughly debunked by historians, maritime experts, and researchers, as implausible and unsupported by verifiable evidence. Key counterarguments include:
Physical and structural differences: The ships, while similar, had distinct interiors and modifications. The Titanic featured a unique Parisian Café and an expanded à la carte restaurant not present on the Olympic, along with different engine room plating. A full switch would have required weeks of labour in drydock, not the few days available, and would be noticeable to the thousands of workers and passengers involved.
Insurance reality: White Star Line would have only recovered about two-thirds of the Titanic's value, far less than the scandal and legal risks of fraud, especially since scuttling a ship at sea with 2,200 people aboard was far riskier than simply damaging it in port.
Wreckage confirmation: Artifacts recovered from the Titanic wreck site, including hull plates stamped with yard number 401 (Titanic's specific construction ID from Harland & Wolff shipyard), definitively identify it as the Titanic, not the Olympic (yard number 400).
Photographic "evidence" explained: Porthole variations were due to ongoing modifications; both ships started with 14 portholes on the C deck, and the Olympic later added two more in early 1912, matching Titanic's final configuration.
Practical impossibilities: The ships were at different construction stages during key 1911–1912 overlaps, and post-sinking; the "Olympic" (allegedly the real Titanic) underwent documented refits that align with its own history, not a swapped identity. Experts like Steve Hall, Bruce Beveridge (authors of Olympic and Titanic: The Truth Behind the Conspiracy), and Mark Chirnside have dissected these points in detail, concluding the switch was logistically unfeasible and economically nonsensical.
In summary, Hamer's book does present a narrative case for the theory, blending historical context with interpretive evidence to challenge the official story, but it doesn't hold up under scrutiny from credible sources. The idea persists in fringe circles due to the enduring mystery of the Titanic, but mainstream historiography views it as a myth born from coincidence and speculation. But still, a good read on a cold Saturday Melbourne night.
Comments