Electoral Fraud, Today, and Yesterday By Charles Taylor
The evidence of electoral fraud continues to grow, and it seems as if Trump is at long last getting up on it. At this point, the Left is starting to get nervous, with the integrity of the dominion computer system, long known to deliver vote flipping, gets challenged. Thus, the Left are starting to talk of a Trump coup, as they now begin to move to their plan B, hyper-rioting and then civil war. Never mind that the mainstream media late last century reported on voting fraud:
There is tremendous evidence of wide spread voter fraud in that there is irrefutable proof that our Republican poll watchers and observers were not allowed to be present in poll counting rooms. Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia and others. Unconstitutional!
and the Fake News Networks aren’t showing these massive gatherings. Instead they have their reporters standing in almost empty streets. We now have SUPPRESSION BY THE PRESS. MAGA!
The most corrupt institutions and individuals in America have declared that the election was free of fraud, and that's good enough for me. What's wrong with the rest of you?
“However, this kind of systemic fraud is anything but unprecedented in Pennsylvania. As none other than The New York Times wrote in February 1994...
"Saying Philadelphia's election system had collapsed under "a massive scheme" by Democrats to steal a State Senate election in November, a Federal judge today took the rare step of invalidating the vote and ordered the seat filled by the Republican candidate."
Judge Newcomer ruled that the Democratic campaign of William G. Stinson had stolen the election from Bruce S. Marks in North Philadelphia's Second Senatorial District through an elaborate fraud in which hundreds of residents were encouraged to vote by absentee ballot even though they had no legal reason -- like a physical disability or a scheduled trip outside the city -- to do so... (emphasis ours)
In many instances, according to Republicans who testified during a four-day civil trial last week, Democratic campaign workers forged absentee ballots. On many of the ballots, they used the names of people who were living in Puerto Rico or serving time in prison, and in one case, the voter had been dead for some time.
"Substantial evidence was presented establishing massive absentee ballot fraud, deception, intimidation, harassment and forgery," Judge Newcomer wrote in a decision made public today.
The district, which includes white, black and Hispanic neighborhoods, is overwhelmingly Democratic by registration. Nonetheless, campaign workers testified that widespread voter apathy had prompted them to promote a "new way to vote" to insure a victory.
Indeed, the two Democrats on the three-member board of elections, an elected body, testified that they were aware of the voter fraud, had intentionally failed to enforce the election law and had later tried to conceal their activities by hurriedly certifying the Democratic candidate as the winner.
Judge Newcomer ordered that Mr. Stinson, a 49-year-old former assistant deputy mayor of Philadelphia, be removed from his State Senate office and that Mr. Marks, a 36-year-old lawyer and former aide to United States Senator Arlen Specter, be certified the winner within 72 hours.
"This is extraordinary relief," Judge Newcomer wrote. "However, it is appropriate because extraordinary conduct by the Stinson campaign and the board tainted the entirety of the absentee ballots."
... some election experts noted today that there have been many larger cases of voter fraud in Chicago and Louisiana in the 1970's and Alabama in the 1980's.
The case involving the Philadelphia seat, however, may be the largest example involving fraudulent absentee ballots.
So, is this where the Democrats got the idea to swamp the nation with mail-in ballots? It worked (for a while) in 1994, why not try it again now... and this time, Dems have the entire media at their behest to whitewash/censor/ban any dissent of a free- and fair-election.”
You cannot keep stolen votes. Thus, if someone stole money from a bank, and got away with it for a time, then suddenly evidence came up, that person does not get to keep the money, for a crime is a crime.
“Truth sleuths all around the world are digging into the Dominion Voting Systems scandal to uncover anything they can find that is suggestive of fraud. And one Twitter user compiled the mother lode of what is known thus far, which in and of itself is damning.
First off, Dominion voting systems can theoretically be programmed to toss ballots that have a straight-ticket vote, meaning all Republicans or all Democrats. According to the official manual, a system setting makes it possible to enable typo fraud as well.
Dominion systems also come with very weak network security, which appears to be intentional. By programming all software keys with the same cryptographic pair, anyone who might try to rig the system has automatic plausible deniability since it cannot be proven who changed a given setting, seeing as how everyone has the same key.
The digital certificates of Dominion systems also come without a password, and the manual explicitly says not to assign them one. This makes it really easy for bad actors to skew the results as they travel between precinct tabulator and central tabulator.
There is also a cryptic “split rotation” function built into Dominion systems that allows for the ability to “force a maximum deviation.” Since neither of these two terms is defined, there is no knowing what this all means.
Another anomalous aspect of Dominion systems is the fact that local IT workers have the ultimate power to clandestinely change settings, potentially altering an entire election.
“There are no checks and balances or observers of the local IT guy when he accesses machine debug and admin settings,” Twitter user @CodeMonkeyZ further explains. “It’s unclear if logs exist.”
Nancy Pelosi, Dianne Feinstein both linked to Dominion Voting Systems
As disturbing as this all is, it is hardly surprising when considering that Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein are both connected to Dominion Voting Systems, holding a vested interest in their continued use.
In truth, Dominion systems are little more than black boxes that send vote tallies to unknown central server systems. This begs the question: Who has access to these central servers and where is the manual and security reviews of the server software?
Concerning the 2020 election, it is being increasingly theorized that Dominion systems were changed or altered at some point during the downtime on election night. Doing this is a much easier process than trying to forge thousands of ballots, after all – and “[a] couple of people could have done it quickly,” @CodeMonkeyZ explains.
In Pennsylvania, Dominion systems had their software modified to change the word “cast,” concerning ballots, to “print.” This change appears to have been made in an effort to obfuscate when the vote was officially cast, probably to make it seem as though late ballots were received on time.
Dominion systems further have an option to “overrun” a preset number of ballots every time someone presses the pause button during a scan. While the word “overrun” is not specifically defined, the potential for abuse “is high with this function,” @CodeMonkeyZ notes, having been added “shortly after 2018 mid-term elections.”
There is a whole lot more that is sure to come in about Dominion systems, but clearly used for nefarious purposes to try to steal the election from President Trump and hand a win to Joe Biden.
“Many people have sent me (completely publicly available) Dominion security audits, documents, manuals, and state contracts,” @CodeMonkeyZ contends. “If there are any potential election fraud settings hiding in plain sight, I will do my best to find it.”