17 Million Excess Deaths Worldwide Linked to the Covid Vax! By Bran Simpson

The article from The Focal Points, authored by Nicolas Hulscher:

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-study-covid-19-vaccine-millions

discusses a new study claiming that the Covid-19 vaccines may have contributed to millions of deaths globally, challenging the mainstream narrative around vaccine safety:

https://www.longdom.org/open-access/the-discrepancy-between-the-number-of-saved-lives-with-covid19-vaccination-and-statistics-of-our-world-data.pdf

Published on March 12, 2025, it dives into an analysis by Rancourt et al., which estimates that approximately 17 million excess deaths worldwide could be linked to the vaccines, based on all-cause mortality data from multiple countries. The piece expresses scepticism toward the establishment's portrayal of the vaccines as universally safe and effective, framing this study as a critical counterpoint that demands attention.

The core issue raised is the alleged underreporting of vaccine-related harms. Hulscher highlights how the study uses excess mortality—deaths above expected baseline levels—as a metric, suggesting that spikes in deaths following vaccination campaigns in 2021 and beyond align too closely with rollout timelines to be coincidental. The article points to specific findings, like a reported 3.7 million excess deaths in India potentially tied to the vaccine push, and argues that these figures dwarf official Covid-19 death tolls. It accuses public health authorities of dismissing such data, implying a cover-up driven by institutional bias or fear of accountability.

Another key discussion is the critique of vaccine efficacy and safety claims. Hulscher asserts that the vaccines, particularly mRNA types, may trigger mechanisms like myocarditis or immune dysregulation, leading to fatal outcomes—a hypothesis he says is sidelined by mainstream science. He contrasts this with the narrative from agencies like the CDC, which maintain that serious adverse events are rare and the vaccines saved millions of lives. The article positions this disconnect as a scandal, questioning why dissenting research struggles to gain traction in peer-reviewed journals or public discourse.

The piece also touches on the broader implications: distrust in medical institutions. By presenting the Rancourt study as evidence of a hidden toll, it fuels a narrative of betrayal—governments and pharma giants prioritising optics over truth. Hulscher calls for independent investigations and raw data transparency, arguing that the public deserves unfiltered access to mortality stats to judge for themselves. It's a rallying cry against what he sees as a sanitised, one-sided story, urging readers to question the "safe and effective" mantra that dominated the pandemic response.

In essence, the article is a provocative take on a polarising issue, blending statistical analysis with outrage at perceived suppression. It doesn't mince words, framing the vaccine program as a potential catastrophe obscured by vested interests, and positions this study as a crack in the official armour that could shift the entire debate—if only it weren't ignored.

Abstract

"Our World Data reports that in 2021, 6.08 million more people died than in 2020. Several articles claim that COVID-19 vaccination in 2021 saved 14 million lives. Their proposition that COVID-19 vaccination saved lives was not proved by statistical data. These articles' calculations evaluate how many people would die without the vaccination. But it was never proved that vaccination saved lives. Statistical data confirm that the mortality of the vaccinated part of the population in 2021 was 14.5% higher than the mortality of the unvaccinated part of the population. The idea of saving lives with COVID-19 vaccination contradicts statistical data."

Here are the key points of this study:

• 6.08 million more deaths occurred in 2021 than in 2020, despite widespread COVID-19 vaccination.
• Mortality rate among vaccinated individuals was 14.5% higher than among unvaccinated individuals.
• If vaccines saved 14 million lives in 2021 as Watson et al claims, total deaths should have decreased, but instead, deaths increased.
• Studies claiming vaccines saved lives rely on theoretical models, not direct statistical comparisons of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated mortality rates.
• Negative correlation observed between vaccination rates and mortality in 37 countries.
• Public health institutions refused to conduct proper comparisons of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated mortality rates.
• Claims of lives saved by vaccination are based on assumptions, not statistical validation.
• Set theory analysis suggests "saved lives" exist only in models, not in real-world mortality data.

As the study concludes,

Theoretical models of how many lives were saved with COVID-19 vaccination without statistical support have no scientific validity and represent a methodological fiasco of public health science. A rigorous and transparent approach to public health science is necessary to ensure that policies and medical interventions are guided by objective data rather than theoretical assumptions.

So, the next time Dr. Peter Hotez claims COVID-19 vaccines saved millions of lives, you'll know it's nothing but propaganda disguised as science."