As is well known in the freedom movement, the Biden administration has treated the prisoners from the January 6, 2021 protests ("J6"), worse than any other political prisoners, going back to Andersonville camp in the Civil War. There have been beatings, with one prisoner losing his sight in one eye from an enraged diverse guard/torturer. And, all this was for nothing, as Trump completely and foolishly thought an establishment person like Pence would dare stand up for election justice.
In any case, one J6 story was of John Strand, who entered the Capital building as a body guard for Dr. Simone Gold, MD, JD, of a leader of America's Frontline Doctors. She was convicted and given a 60-day jail term. However, Strand refused the offered plea deal, which involved expressing guilt, common with communist Maoist show trials. He was then thrown back into prison, where he is today. But with a recent Supreme Court ruling in Fischer v. United States, he may soon be released.
The decision was 6-3, with Trump-appointed disaster Barrett dissenting, and joining the liberals. The lead judgment was by Chief Justice Roberts, who is coming out more conservative than Barrett. What is of interest to people in other jurisdictions is how the rule of law was perverted in this case. The J6 protesters were said to be engaged in an "insurrection," but none were charged with insurrection at all. Instead, the Injustice Department cooked up charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1512, which is titled "Tampering with a witness, victim or an informant." 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(1) punishes anyone who "alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals" evidence. None of the J6 defendants tampered with any evidence. The judgment which should have been made years ago, held that misdemeanour trespass did not relate to evidence tampering. Thus, the state's cases collapse.
This shows the corruption of Leftist regimes such as the Biden one, where the rule of law is replaced by the rule of the will to power. Parallel things like this are happening across the West.
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/a-modicum-of-j6-justice-fischer-v
"Readers of this Substack may recall a prior post that included the brave but bizarre story of Mr. John Strand, who was sentenced to a 32-month prison term for entering the capital on January 06 as a bodyguard for Dr. Simone Gold, MD, JD.
Dr. Gold, a leader of America's Frontline Doctors group, pleaded guilty to lesser J6 charges, was sentenced to jail, completed her 60-day prison term for misdemeanor trespassing, and was released. John would not accept the plea deal offered by the Biden Department of "Justice." After he refused the plea deal, he had a rather cooked set of contrived charges thrown at him. This was followed by yet more examples of how corporate media will aggressively smear those who are labeled as enemies of the Blob/Administrative state. This whole sordid affair represents another case of arbitrary and capricious weaponization of the government against political opponents by the Biden administration and its lapdog media.
By way of disclosure of any appearance of a potential conflict of interest, I respect Dr. Simone Gold and consider her both a friend and a valued professional colleague. I am not a member of America's Frontline Doctors, but have been honored to speak by invitation at some of their events.
As a consequence of today's Supreme Court ruling in Fischer v. United States, John Strand will hopefully be released within the next three weeks. He has been tested in the crucible of history, passed the test with his integrity intact, and retained ownership of his soul. In my opinion, he deserves a hero's welcome upon his release.
You can learn more about John Strand and his story at his website, or via The following Epoch Times documentaries:
Part 2 features John's story
The Real Story of January 6 Part 2: The Long Road Home
Additional information can be found at the bottom of this Substack post.
In the official Americas Frontline Doctors press release published below, Dr. Gold has summarized the context, meaning, and details of today's Supreme Court decision in the case of Fischer v United States.
SCOTUS Delivers Historic Fischer v. USA Ruling
Politically Persecuted J6 Defendants Advance Toward Justice
Washington, DC. – June 28, 2024. The High Court's decision has brought down the entire house of cards that is the selective prosecution of the J6 defendants by the DOJ and has proven that the United States of America still operates under the rule of law.
On Friday, June 28, 2024, SCOTUS delivered a 6-3 decision in the landmark Fischer v. USA case. Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Jackson joined. Jackson filed a concurring opinion. Barrett filed a dissenting opinion, in which Sotomayor and Kagan joined.
"To prove a violation of Section 1512(c)(2), the Government must establish that the defendant impaired the availability or integrity for use in an official proceeding of records, documents, objects, or as we earlier explained, other things used in the proceeding, or attempted to do so. The judgment of the D. C. Circuit is therefore vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. On remand, the D. C. Circuit may assess the sufficiency of Count Three of Fischer's indictment in light of our interpretation of Section 1512(c)(2)."
- Chief Justice Roberts
AFLDS applauds SCOTUS for recognizing and correcting the tremendous miscarriage of justice perpetrated on hundreds of ordinary Americans across the country. The federal government's weaponization of 18 USC § 1512(c)(2) was unquestionably used to charge the J6 defendants with a maximized 20-year felony and punish them for daring to exercise their First Amendment right to protest the actions of their elected officials.
To date, more than 355 J6 defendants have been unjustly charged with "corruptly" obstructing, influencing, or impeding an official proceeding or attempting to do so. Many have been sentenced to prison time ranging from 8 months to more than 4 years, and over 100 are still political prisoners today.
As stated by AFLDS' affiliate attorney, David Dalia:
"The statute at issue in Fischer, 18 U.S.C. § 1512, is titled 'Tampering with a witness, victim or an informant." 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(1) punishes anyone who 'alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals' evidence. None of the J6 defendants tampered with any evidence. So it's very gratifying that the Supreme Court in Fischer decided today that the (c) (2) residuary clause must be read narrowly , and that the 'otherwise' provision of §1512(c)(2) is limited by the list of specific 'evidence tampering' criminal violations that precede it in (c)(1). The residuary clause does NOT extend to acts unrelated to evidence tampering, such as mere misdemeanor trespass."
Mr. Dalia continued,
"This § 1512(c)(2) residuary clause was relentlessly stretched by the DOJ to overcharge the J6 defendants for mere misdemeanor trespass, unlawfully giving the DOJ powerful leverage to wring plea agreements from defendants under the threat of illegal and extremely lengthy felony prison terms. Although J6 defendants were incessantly branded by the mainstream media as 'insurrectionists,' not one person was ever charged with insurrection, which 'only' carries a 10 year prison term. Instead, all were charged with §1512(c)(2)'s 20-year prison term. Thankfully, this unjust overcharge was rejected today by SCOTUS. Now all of the J6 defendants are entitled to have their long jail sentences immediately recalculated. In the vast majority of cases, this should result in their release. Relief for these long-suffering J6 defendants cannot come soon enough."
In response to SCOTUS' ruling in the Fischer Case, AFLDS Founder and President Dr. Simone Gold, firmly declared that the High Court's decision is a "critical step for preserving the rule of law in our nation. With >300,000 federal statutes providing pretext for federal prosecutors to target and selectively persecute anyone with an unrelated felony charge, SCOTUS has averted a dangerous precedent that would have been felt far beyond Fischer. This is a victory for all Americans and a monumental defeat for those attempting to legalize fascism in our country."
Dr. Gold added, "This is also a very personal victory to me. I faced this felony charge and chose to accept a plea deal because of the lengthy 20-year sentence. My friend and co-worker, John Strand, is currently serving a 30-month sentence in federal prison because he refused to accept a plea for this dishonest - and now definitively illegal - charge."
The High Court's ruling sends a clear message that the selective persecution of the government's "political enemies" will not be tolerated in the United States of America. AFLDS stands in solidarity with the J6 prisoners and their families. We will continue to fight for our First Amendment right to free speech and the right to peaceably assemble."