As Steve Kirsch says, from viewing attorney Robert Barnes who is going up against Pfizer in a fraud case, a defence has been raised to Pfizer fraud claims, that it was not fraud because they cooperated with the government, which is true. However, is that a defence to fraud? Unless certain legislation protects them, which I doubt in this instance, all it means is the Pfizer and the government are joint partners in the enterprise. It is like a murderer arguing that he is not responsible for murder, from shooting a victim, as his partner in crime fired a hitting shot too. But, we will see where this goes, the attorney Robert Barnes, seems confident, which is a good sign.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/pfizer-admits-to-fraud-in-court?s=r
“Pfizer admits to fraud in court
Their defense to the fraud claims against them is that because the government was in on it, it isn't fraud. Pfizer whistle-blower Brook Jackson's attorney, Robert Barnes, isn't buying the argument.
You really can’t make this stuff up. You gotta watch this video… it’s only 2 minutes. And it will be a key piece of evidence in my next move which you’ll learn about shortly.
In a nutshell, Pfizer admits in court to fraud, but says it isn’t fraud because the government was in on it. I bet you never heard that defense before.”