As argued by technocracy critic, Patrick Wood, the World Health Organization's globalist agenda has been put firmly in place, regardless of whether the pandemic treaty, and international health regulations, go through in the form that is presently being promoted.
"One Health," the overriding philosophy behind it all, had been conceived by the World Wildlife Conversation Association in 2004, and the One Health Commission was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2009. The core idea was to push an "ecological" concept of health, that would fit into the climate change agenda. Health is viewed holistically, involving all aspects of well-being. This position is also seen in the articles published by the medical journal, The Lancet. That sounds initially plausible until one realises that "well-being" is a politically loaded term, and embraces all that we are seeing Leftism now push.
Thus, on One Health, there can be go 'health" without social justice, as defined by the Left, including trans rights and all the rest. Personally, I would rather stick to individual freedom than this globalist touch-me-feel-me stuff, which becomes quite lethal to liberty when codified in the pandemic treaty.
"While the World Health Organization has been gaslighting the world about the need for a global "Pandemic Agreement," the Feds had already rolled out the infrastructure to support it when nobody was watching.
While the United Nations and its WHO should be kicked out of New York into the Atlantic Ocean, the real problem is our own government, which has been front-running the whole operation for years.
It's called "One Health."
Initially conceived by the World Wildlife Conversation Association in 2004, the One Health Commission was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2009 with the objective of spreading the concept widely. It worked.
The NIH (National Institute for Health) got on board in a 2013 study, Toward Proof of Concept of a One Health Approach to Disease Prediction and Control, where they considered "the role of changing environments with regard to infectious and chronic disease risks affecting humans and nonhuman animals" and "disease prediction and control." Then…
They found evidence to support each of these concepts but also identified the need for greater incorporation of environmental and ecosystem factors into disease assessments and interventions.
In 2023, not surprisingly, the CDC and the HHS (Department of Health and Human Services) conducted a study: National One Health Framework To Address Zoonotic Diseases and Advance Public Health Preparedness in the United States: A Framework for One Health Coordination and Collaboration Across Federal Agencies."
So, off to the races they went. spreading the contagion (as a bonafide fact, not!) throughout several government agencies."