If a sports team was majority Black, liberals could be crying tears of moral superiority, proclaiming the joys of diversity. But, when the English Women’s World Cup team, is found to have majority female Nordics, blue-eyed and blonde hair, you can feel the anti-Nordicism. Why should this be mentioned if each person got in the team by merit, and the race-based critics have not produced evidence that they did not? It must be the blue-eyes and blonde hair setting them off.
Here, once more is the culture of the Great Replacement, and the folly of allowing the elites to succeed in mass migration and multicult cultural transformation.
“The English Women’s World Cup team has been blasted for being too full of “blonde, blue-eyed” players, as the establishment media continues to air openly racial attacks on the native population of the country.
Following a heartbreaking 1-0 loss to Spain in Sunday’s Women’s World Cup, a panel discussion hosted by Sky News devolved into the topic of the supposed lack of diversity on the England squad rather than on the sport itself.
During the segment, Wilfred Emmanuel-Jones MBE, a Jamaican-born British farmer, said in response to a Daily Mirror newspaper cover featuring the members of the ‘Lionesses’, saying: “I don’t want to pour boiling water on it but it isn’t that diverse”
“It really sticks out at you. They look blonde and blue-eyed. If it was the men’s World Cup it would be very representative of the Britain that we’re in and very, very diverse,” he continued.
“What jumps out at you is that this doesn’t represent diverse Britain. It’s all these blonde blue-eyed girls – and I wish them well – but I do think we need to ask ourselves questions about why it is that there is a lack of diversity.”
While the England team is mostly white, it is not the case that there is no diversity on the squad, with forward Lauren James and defender Jess Carter having diverse heritage.”