The story of the collapse of the three, not just two, World Trade Center towers is fascinating. Two towers were struck by air planes and the debate has been whether this was sufficient to create the pan-caking collapse effect. But no planes struck the third tower, WTC 7. The official report has it that fire and debris from the other explosions structurally damaged WCT 7, leading to its pan-caking collapse, which looks just like it was imploded. That has long been disputed.
Now there is a structural re-evaluation of the collapse of WCT 7, by the Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbank. As would be expected the report is complex with engineering considerations. But for our purposes, what is significant is the conclusion: fire did not cause the collapse, and there was a simultaneous collapse of every column in the building. The report did not go onto speculation what did cause the collapse, as this was outside their terms of reference. However, at that point, engineering goes over to politics. The only plausible mechanism for the simultaneous collapse of all columns is that the building must have been imploded, a deliberate explosion. If this is so, who did it, and how does this bear upon the collapse of the other buildings?
Clearly this was one of the great conspiracies of the early 21st century, and after this the globalists were fired up enough to pull off the even greater conspiracy of the Covid plandemic.
This is a study of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) — a 47-story building that suffered a total collapse at 5:20 PM on September 11, 2001, following the horrible events of that morning. The objective of the study was threefold: (1) Examine the structural response of WTC 7 to fire loads that may have occurred on September 11, 2001; (2) Rule out scenarios that could not have caused the observed collapse; and (3) Identify types of failures and their locations that may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.
The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.
The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.”