The UK is supposedly facing record high temperatures, in fact "extremes," and the drive for zero net carbon emissions is being pushed with a fanatical fervour. But what about the temperatures, where are the measurements taking place? As noted by the Daily Sceptic.org, a go to site for debunking climate change extremism, the most recent extreme was measured at Teddington Bushy Park measuring station. With a name like that something just has to be fishy. And it was. This is a junk class 4 station with internationally-recognised "uncertainties" of 2°C, which basically makes the measurements, useless due to "extreme" uncertainties. In fact, 77.9 percent of Met Office sites are rated class 4 and 5 and have uncertainties of 2°C and 5°C respectively, also calling the objectivity of reported temperature increases into doubt.
It is a worthwhile research endeavour for climate change sceptics to check out where the measuring stations are in their jurisdiction. A good guess will be urban hot areas such as airports. It really is for the climate change agenda, garbage in, garbage out.
"These days the Met Office has rebadged its daily "high" temperatures as "extreme", all the better of course to ramp up fears of heat as part of the Net Zero education process. Last Wednesday's "extreme" of 20.4°C was recorded at Teddington Bushy Park. As the Google Earth photo below shows, the "extreme" temperature is helped on its way by an adjacent high wall reflecting heat onto the measuring device and a large housing development warming the nearby area. Teddington Bushy Park is a junk class 4 station with internationally-recognised "uncertainties" of 2°C. Joke class 4 station might be a more apt description. How anyone can think information taken at this site is suitable for scientific work that ultimately produces a global mean temperature is a mystery.
Under a classification system set by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) that takes account of temperature corruptions, natural and unnatural, 77.9% of Met Office sites are rated class 4 and 5 and have uncertainties of 2°C and 5°C respectively. The Met Office does its best to explain away the poor siting of most of its UK-wide 380-strong temperature station network. Class 3 – uncertainties of 1°C – and class 4 are said to produce "valid high-quality data", something that might be in dispute by looking at the Teddington photo. The WMO is said by the Met Office not to preclude the use of data from super junk class 5. For its part, the WMO states that a class 5 is "where nearby obstacles create an inappropriate environment for a meteorological measurement that is intended to be representative of a wider area". Nearly one in three (29.2%) of the Met Office's sites are rated super-junk 5 and from this, apparently, the Met Office can produce average temperature figures to one hundredth of a degree centigrade.
Earlier this year, a freedom of information request from the Daily Sceptic finally revealed what has been suspected for a long time, namely that the Met Office temperature measuring system is not fit for the purpose of providing accurate measurements of temperature either at specific local sites or at national and global average scale. To date, the Met Office has not made an official statement on the growing concerns that surround its scientific work following the startling revelations. It does however produce an occasional remark that suggests it is hiding from the implications of the growing criticism. Last June it declared the highest, pardon, the most extreme temperature so far of the summer at Chertsey, another 'record' that came under question when it was revealed that the measuring device at Chertsey water pumping station was surrounded by a newly-built solar farm.
This is the solar farm in question and it surrounds what appears to be the temperature measuring station. To be fair to the Met Office, Google Maps puts the station a few yards away – there are sometimes small errors in precise placing of any location. But what is not disputed is that the site is next to a large solar farm with over 1,800 panels. Solar panels generate large amounts of heat in the nearby areas with scientists suggesting warming of 3-4°C. Citizen journalist Ray Sanders recently tackled the Met Office on the Chertsey location and the state-funded weather service admitted it was "aware" of the solar panels near its station. "The temperature measurements meet standards for publication and scientific use," noted the Met Office.
Over in the United States, meteorologist Anthony Watts has spent decades investigating the temperature output of the local weather service NOAA. He recently presented evidence to show that NOAA's temperature data was "fatally flawed" with an astonishing 96% of 4,000 plus measuring stations corrupted by poor placement. As in the U.K., many photos of unsuitable locations have been published. The one below from a site in Florida showing measurements taken near a bank of air conditioning units is a particular horror show.
Appearing on a recent Tom Nelson podcast, Watts was asked about the 40.3°C runway record temperature declared for 60 seconds on July 19th 2022 as jets were landing at RAF Coningsby in the U.K. He pointed out that such events were caused by new electronic measurements that reacted to temperature change within one tenth of a second. The previous mercury thermometers took much longer to move and would never have picked up temporary temperature movements caused by gusts of wind or passing jet aircraft.
All of these figures are collected and then adjusted and the "bottom line" is that the data have been changed to increase the warming trend. A number of attempts have been made to estimate the changes caused by numerous corruptions. "We have about 50% less global warming than the media and activists would have you believe", Watts suggests."