The recent ruling by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) against Dr. Jereth Kok, a Christian general practitioner from Melbourne, marks a chilling assault on civil liberties in Australia. Found guilty of professional misconduct not for medical malpractice but for his private online expressions of faith and conservative views, Dr. Kok's case exposes a disturbing trend: the state's growing power to police personal beliefs under the guise of professional regulation. This unprecedented overreach threatens freedom of speech, religious liberty, and the right to conscience, signalling a broader war on dissent that demands urgent public resistance.
Dr. Kok's "crime" was not botched surgeries or patient harm, but 54 out of 85 social media posts, spanning 12 years, deemed "disrespectful," "unbalanced," or "derogatory" by VCAT. These included sharing a satirical Babylon Bee article mocking pronoun culture, quoting biblical passages, and criticising COVID mandates and abortion, views rooted in his Christian faith and conservative principles. None of these posts were directed at patients, linked to clinical care, or caused harm. Many were private, behind restricted settings, yet were dredged up following an anonymous complaint, suggesting a targeted campaign to silence him.
VCAT's ruling, as reported by Nation First, admitted that Dr. Kok's comments were political or religious in nature and often satirical. No evidence supported claims of inciting genocide or racial violence, and one-third of the Medical Board's accusations were dismissed. Yet, the tribunal declared him guilty of misconduct, with a sentencing hearing set for 2026 that could permanently deregister him from practicing medicine. This punishment for "wrongthink" sets a dangerous precedent, extending regulatory oversight into the private lives of professionals and punishing beliefs rather than actions.
The case raises profound civil liberties concerns, striking at the heart of freedom of speech and religious expression. Dr. Kok's posts, while provocative to some, fall squarely within protected speech under Australia's democratic framework. The Australian Human Rights Commission defines freedom of expression as including the right to express controversial or offensive opinions, provided they do not incite violence or hatred. Dr. Kok's satirical and religious commentary, on issues like abortion (which he called "baby-killing") and gender ideology, clearly meets this threshold, yet VCAT deemed it incompatible with medical professionalism.
This overreach violates the principle of proportionality, a cornerstone of legal fairness. Punishing a doctor for private views unrelated to his professional conduct undermines the right to a private life, enshrined in international human rights law like Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Australia is a signatory. The claim to police online speech, as noted by the Human Rights Law Alliance, lacks clear boundaries, creating a chilling effect where professionals self-censor to avoid career destruction.
Religious liberty is equally under threat. Dr. Kok's Christian beliefs, including his view that life begins at conception, are mainstream among millions of Australians. By labelling biblical references and moral stances as misconduct, VCAT is effectively criminalising religious conviction. This echoes historical examples of state overreach, such as the UK's 2018 prosecution of street preachers for quoting scripture, and risks alienating religious professionals from public life. The message is clear: conform to progressive orthodoxy or lose your livelihood.
Dr. Kok's case is a test case for a broader agenda. These actions signal a shift toward a "medical theocracy," where woke ideology trumps individual rights. The tribunal's focus on "respecting diversity" as a professional standard chooses political correctness over objective qualifications, transforming regulatory bodies into thought police. This trend is not unique to medicine, teachers, lawyers, and other licensed professionals face similar risks if their personal views deviate from approved narratives.
The precedent set by VCAT endangers all Australians. If a doctor can be stripped of his career for private posts, what prevents other regulators from targeting teachers for criticising gender ideology in schools or journalists for questioning government policies? The Online Safety Act 2023, which has led to over 1,570 arrests for online speech since October 2023, already shows how far the state is willing to go to control expression. Dr. Kok's case extends this censorship into professional spheres, creating a society where dissenters are systematically silenced.
The anonymous complaint that triggered Dr. Kok's investigation raises further questions about fairness. Without transparency about the complainant's motives, the process reeks of ideological vendetta. The Medical Board's selective focus on Dr. Kok's Christian and conservative views, while ignoring similar expressions from progressive professionals, suggests a double standard. This aligns with broader patterns of institutional bias, where conservative voices, particularly religious ones, are disproportionately targeted. For example, the 2025 cancellation of Anglican priest Fr. Calvin Robinson for his outspoken Christian views, mirrors Dr. Kok's persecution, highlighting a systemic hostility toward traditional beliefs.
Dr. Kok's case is a clarion call for Australians to defend their civil liberties. The Human Rights Law Alliance, supporting Dr. Kok's appeal, warns that without pushback, the decision could expand to police any professional's beliefs, from priests to educators. To halt this slide into authoritarianism, immediate action is needed:
Demand Accountability: Contact federal and state MPs to demand legislation protecting freedom of speech and religious expression for professionals. The 2023 "Voice" referendum's rejection shows Australians oppose identity-based policies; lawmakers must heed this sentiment.
Support Legal Challenges: Donate to the Human Rights Law Alliance to fund Dr. Kok's appeal, which could set a counter-precedent limiting regulatory overreach.
Amplify the Truth: Share Dr. Kok's story widely to expose the Medical Board's actions. Public pressure can deter further persecution and galvanise resistance.
Resist Self-Censorship: Professionals must continue expressing their beliefs, whether religious or political, to normalise dissent and prevent a culture of fear.
The suspension of Dr. Jereth Kok is not just an attack on one man, it's an assault on the principles of free speech, religious liberty, and personal conscience that define a free society. By punishing a doctor for private, non-harmful beliefs, VCAT and the Medical Board are erecting a dangerous precedent that threatens every Australian's right to think and speak freely. This is not about protecting patients; it's about enforcing ideological conformity. If we allow Dr. Kok to be "crucified" for his faith, we pave the way for a future where truth itself is outlawed. Australians must reject this medical theocracy and defend the freedoms that make democracy possible.
https://nationfirst.substack.com/p/they-cancelled-him-for-being-christian
A Christian doctor has just been found guilty of misconduct, not for medical failings, but for private online beliefs.
Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal reviewed 12 years of posts and condemned dozens as too offensive or unbalanced for public tolerance.
None of the content harmed patients or was linked to clinical care, yet it triggered professional punishment.
This ruling signals that Christian and conservative professionals can be penalised for personal convictions.
The message is clear: speak biblical truth publicly, and risk losing your career in modern Australia.
Let me say this as plainly as I can: they didn't just suspend a doctor. They suspended truth itself. They nailed a man to the wall for saying what millions of us believe: that life begins at conception, that men cannot become women, and that COVID mandates were a masterclass in tyranny.
Dr Jereth Kok, a Christian GP from Melbourne, has had his career torched by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT), not for what he did in the clinic, but for what he posted online. Posts most people never even saw. Posts behind privacy settings. Posts that were satirical, biblical, or, heaven forbid, conservative.
Twelve years of online posts. Eighty-five total. They dredged them up like some twisted inquisition. VCAT found 54 of them to be misconduct. That's right, memes, articles, scripture, all labelled too "disrespectful," "unbalanced," or "derogatory" to be tolerated in today's Ministry of Truth.
One of his crimes? Sharing a Babylon Bee satire article titled "Instead of Traditional Warfare, Chinese Military Will Now Be Trained to Shout Wrong Pronouns at American Troops." That's it. That's "misconduct" now. Another "offence"? Calling abortion what it is: baby-killing. For that, he's been declared unfit to practise medicine.
This wasn't about patient safety. This wasn't about medical negligence. This was about a regime flexing its muscle and sending a message: if you believe in God over government, you're next.
You think I'm exaggerating? Read the tribunal's ruling yourself. They openly admitted his comments weren't directed at patients, didn't harm anyone, and were often private. But because they might offend the rainbow gods of identity politics, he's been thrown into the wilderness.
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Let's be clear: this man never hurt a soul. Not a single patient ever complained about him. But faceless bureaucrats, tipped off anonymously, decided that his thoughts were too dangerous for modern Australia.
Even the worst allegations, that he supported genocide or racial violence, were not upheld. They admitted most of the content was satirical. They admitted much of it was political or religious commentary. In fact, one-third of the Medical Board's accusations were flat-out rejected. And yet, the verdict? Guilty of professional misconduct.
He didn't commit malpractice. He committed wrongthink.
And it's not over. The sentence hasn't even dropped yet; that comes in 2026. He could still be permanently deregistered. That means banned for life from ever practising medicine again, not for botching a surgery or misdiagnosing a child, but for having the spine to say what the woke class hates.
The official statement from Dr Kok, released through the Human Rights Law Alliance, makes it crystal clear: this is a test case. A precedent. A warning to every doctor, lawyer, teacher, or professional with a licence.
The Medical Board now claims the power to police not just what you do at work, but what you think at home, post on social media, or say in church. Christian doctors, beware: your Facebook post could cost you your career.
The Human Rights Law Alliance put it bluntly:
The delineation is unclear of where the Medical Board's powers to police online speech may end... This allows the Medical Board to police the religious and political beliefs of doctors and makes health practitioners dramatically vulnerable to professional sanction…
Translation? If you're a Christian who dares open your mouth — you're on notice.
So here's my question to every freedom-loving Australian reading this:
How long are you willing to stay silent? Until they gag your priest? Your children's teacher? Your own employer? Until quoting the Bible gets you fired? Until satire is banned? Until truth is illegal?
We are watching the birth of a medical theocracy — not one ruled by faith, but by woke doctrine. A world where "respecting diversity" means deleting Christianity. A country where a meme can destroy your life.
VCAT and the Medical Board just declared war on conscience.
They're betting that if they burn one man publicly, the rest of us will fall in line. They want the rest of us to whisper in the shadows, to apologise for believing in truth, to beg for permission to speak.
Well, I won't.
I won't apologise for being Christian.
I won't bow to rainbow ideology.
I won't pretend that silence is safer than truth.
And neither should you.
Here's What You Must Do — Right Now:
Share this article like wildfire. Post it in every group. Email it. Print it.
Contact your MP, federal and state, and demand action on freedom of speech and religious expression.
Donate to the Human Rights Law Alliance and help fund Dr Kok's legal appeal. They need it. Badly.
Refuse the muzzle. If you're a professional, speak now or forever regret your silence.
This is the hill. This is the line in the sand.
If we don't defend Dr Jereth Kok, we're next.
Let's show VCAT they picked the wrong Christian to crucify.
Let's roar back."