Statistic gurus, Professors Norman Fenton and Martin Neil, have been refuting mainstream Covid narratives throughout the plandemic, and they still are. In a recent post, they comment upon an article that was published in the medical journal The Lancet claiming that the Covid vaccines saved 20 million lives, which is ironically the same figure that critics say were mortality victims of the vax. They have a video which refutes the claim, and they make in passing a useful observation of the champions of his thesis also having World Economic Forum connections.
So what is wrong with the 20 million saved figure? The problem is that this is impossible to prove scientifically. It is making a counter-factual reference to a possible world situation where some vaxxed individual X was not vaxxed. Would X have survived? If X was not aged or immune deficit, probably yes, given the low mortality of the Covid diseases. So, it is impossible to come up with a figure like 20 million at all.
"Despite being easily debunked, the paper published in The Lancet claiming the covid vaccines saved 20 million lives in the first year alone is being used to shut down debate about vaccine injuries and deaths. After all, if the 'prestigious' Lancet says the vaccine saved 20 million lives then we have to prove that the vaccine killed at least this number to show that the risks outweigh the benefits.
Iskra Reic, Astra Zenica EVP … uses the Lancet study to shut down the debate in the EU Parliament. She also wrote this OpEd on 1 July 2021 demanding everyone in the world be vaccinated as she says "Everyone now recognises no one is safe until we are all safe." She is, of course, listed with the World Economic Forum (WEF).