TrialSite news.com, and The Spectator.com, have given comprehensive discussions of the controversy, at least among Covid critics, of the contents of the Covid vaxxes. At one end of the spectrum, I do not say “extreme,” are those seeing the strange objects observed in the vaxxes, nanotechnology, supposedly activated by 5G technology. Others say that the odd structures in observed vax samples, are thought to be based upon graphene oxide. The problem is, that there is no rigorous scientific experimental examination, the research being done by amateurs, rather than experts in the field. That is the result of the lack of science in this area, which will impact upon people’s lives. Indeed, scientific illiteracy, common today, was one factor enabling the populace to uncritically accept the vaxxes, but it is only one factor, as the scientists, and most academic, so-called high IQ people, also took the Kool Aid.
https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/britishaustralian-weekly-features-trialsite-contributor-is-graphene-oxide-in-the-covid-19-vaccines-c3fb09f6
“Online rumors, chatter, and then emerging reports of strange objects found in the COVID-19 vaccine vials have been circulating for over a year now. Some of the babble clearly seems questionable, if not the material of what this media considered outlandish conspiratorial rant: the stuff of loons and conspiracy junkies. These include claims that the vaccines consist of self-assembling, disassembling metallic nanobots, part of some sinister covert defense operation masking as medicine to save the world. The sinister Orwellian goal—use the COVID-19 vaccine to control the population, while also paring down the planet’s population so a cadre of elite globalists can monopolize the beauty and bounty of Earth? Of course, such talk is just ridiculous, serving to impede and even sabotage any serious movement to legitimately question and investigate the COVID-19 vaccination program. Yet this media cannot deny that there are reports coming out of various countries now that in fact, do point to inexplicable objects in the mRNA vaccines that manifest in various microscopic examinations. With metallic-looking lustrous squares and various other shapes that do look strangely more like what one would expect when viewing microscopically some kind of advanced nano-technology product rather than the contents of an mRNA vaccine, a consensus of concerned, albeit still predominantly fringe critical thinkers grows for governments to formally investigate.
While alternative media or individual contributors on Substack have been reporting on these strange objects for a while now, purportedly identifiable via microscopic examination--some commentators have suggested that they seem to look like graphene oxide---the topic not brought up until lately, by the fringe. This includes alternative media sources seeking to capitalize (and monetize) growing anti-government sentiment due to the pandemic response. By this point, however, it becomes difficult to avoid the accumulation of independent study findings, ones that do point to the apparent veracity of the bizarre microscopic images.
TrialSite monitored these reports by early 2021, tracking the topic but avoiding any actual reporting on the matter. This media had suspicions about some of these reports early on—questioning why they were not subjected to the typical scientific process (e.g., group of scientists, write up findings, upload to preprint server to try to get the output peer-reviewed and published).
Of course, bias in scientific journals, not new, intensified during the pandemic while the growing number of independent, seemingly legitimate individuals and groups showcasing comparable findings prompted this media to take a closer look.
TrialSite reported that the COVID-19 vaccine products (including the vials) were both considered proprietary and government property and could not be easily studied on an independent basis. By the end of 2021, this media did report that one German scientist died just days after uploading a video reporting that the COVID-19 vaccines contained graphene oxide. While some people were certain his death was linked to the video, fact-checkers, not surprisingly summarized, rejected as pure conspiracy talk.
By September of this year, TrialSite surveyed some initial findings out of Germany. Most recently, TrialSite contributor Sasha Latypova, a medical product entrepreneur with deep expertise in Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulated markets, surveyed the current claims emanating out of Europe and Australia, finding troubling accounts along the way.
For example, Ms. Latypova delved into an independent examination conducted by family physician David Nixon in Australia—the topic of The Spectator piece today. Examining several vials in a frozen state and thereafter, probing the contents while dry on a microscope slide, Latypova reported findings consistent with those in Europe—strange snowy or “confetti-like” objects appeared. What were these strange items? Could they be impurities due to quality issues associated with a rushed manufacturing process?
TrialSite reported that while the Nixon report nor those in Germany or elsewhere were peer reviewed (hence in traditional scientific circles they wouldn’t be considered evidence), they did, however, appear like credible independent investigations. Put another way, the TrialSite internal consensus emerged by mid-2022 that these doctors and scientists looking into the microscopic contents of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines appeared sincere, authentic, and not involved with some sort of inappropriate anti-vaxx-driven scheme to spook health consumer markets.
Now the Anglosphere weekly The Spectator, albeit definitely conservative-leaning, allowed the topic to be covered by Ms. Rebecca Weisser.
Enter The Spectator Piece
Covered by Australian Rebecca Weisser for the Australian edition of the conservative, British online and print magazine focusing on politics, culture, and current affairs, the topic of the bizarre metallic, non-sized objects in the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines is about to get a lot more attention worldwide.
Founded in 1828, England’s The Spectator remains the oldest surviving weekly magazine in the world, with editorial positions over the last several decades representing an important step on the ladder to the high office in Britain’s Conservative Party. The recent Weisser piece in the Australian edition asks, “What is in the Pfizer vaccines?”
Noteworthy, the investigational work of TrialSite’s Sasha Latypova now influences more serious mainstream media sources, as Weisser shares with the conservative-leaning, yet mainstream-leaning demographic, that it’s not that simple to merely study the COVID-19 vaccine vials from Pfizer of Moderna, as the journalist writes about organizing such a test:
“That’s a more radical decision than it might sound. According to Sasha Latypova, a scientist with 25 years of experience in clinical trials for pharmaceutical companies, the contract between Pfizer and the US government prohibits independent researchers from studying the vaccines. They claim it would ‘divert’ these precious resources away from their intended use fulfilling an ‘urgent’ need.”
The Spectator writer continued, “Are Sasha’s declarations correct?”
Weisser points out that in Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) did in fact test the vials as did the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) pointing out that the mRNA products were authorized after testing for metals such as iron, nickel, cobalt, lithium, etc. or for that matter, other ‘manufactured products such as micro-electronics, electrodes, carbon nanotubes, and nanowire semiconductors. But one particular substance was precluded from testing: Graphene oxide.
What about Graphene?
A substance touted for its benefits in biomedical solutions, this allotrope of carbon is made up of a single layer of atoms arranged in a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice nanostructure according to entries in established scientific media such as the New Journal of Physics. As touted by the University of Manchester, “No other material has the breadth of superlatives that graphene boasts, making it ideal for countless applications. It is many times stronger than steel, yet incredibly lightweight and flexible. It is electrically and thermally conductive but also transparent.” All sorts of use cases exist in biomedical product development.
The Spectator’s Weisser summarizes benefits for biomedical use including, “its ultra-high drug-loading efficiency due to the wide surface area” as well as its “exceptional chemical and mechanical constancy, sublime conductivity, and excellent biocompatibility.” But the writer also points out the potential “toxic effect on living cells and organs” limiting current use.
Weisser again revealed that the aforementioned agencies didn’t include graphene oxide on the list for COVID-19 vaccine testing.
She confirms in The Spectator what Latypova also reports in the TrialSite opinion piece:
“So, is there graphene oxide in the Pfizer shots? What Nixon found, and filmed, is bizarre to say the least. Inside a droplet of vaccine are strange mechanical structures. They seem motionless at first but when Nixon used time-lapse photography to condense 48 hours of footage into two minutes, it showed what appear to be mechanical arms assembling and disassembling glowing rectangular structures that look like circuitry and microchips. These are not ‘manufactured products' in the CDC’s words because they construct and deconstruct themselves, but the formation of the crystals seems to be stimulated by electromagnetic radiation and stops when the slide with the vaccine is shielded by a Faraday bag. Nixon’s findings are similar to those of teams in New Zealand, Germany, Spain, and South Korea.”
Italian Hypothesis based on Blood Samples
One group of Italian scientists led by Riccardo Benzi Cipelli is front and center in the graphene oxide theory. That is, the objects identified by several groups now examining the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine vials and blood samples of COVID-19 vaccinated under the microscope demonstrate anomalies.
The Spectator reports that the Italian study involved blood derived from over 1,000 vaccinated persons who experienced side effects. Benzi Cipelli and colleagues’ findings were certainly disturbing:
“Over 94% of the tests featured abnormal readings, deformed red blood cells, reduced in counts and clumped around luminescent foreign objects which also attracted clusters of fibrins. Some of the foreign objects dotted the blood like a starry night, some self-assembled into crystalline structures and others into spindly branches and tubes.”
The Italian group’s hypothesis: these objects in the COVID-19 vaccines are some kinds of metallic particles that “resemble graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds.”
Could it be that this damaged blood possibly due to these strange nano-sized objects contributes to post-COVID-19 vaccine injury phenomena such as coagulation disorders?
Enter Dr. Wendy Hoy
Dr. Nixon shared his findings with prominent physician-scientist Dr. Wendy Hoy, professor of medicine at the University of Queensland. Hoy is known globally for her multidisciplinary research into kidney and related chronic diseases, emphasizing the investigation of high-risk populations. She was among the first to describe kidney disease, independent of diabetes, in Native Americans, in studies of Zuni, Rio Grande Pueblo, Navajo, and Apache Indians in the Southwest of the USA.
Interviewed by TrialSite in the past, Dr. Wendy Hoy, contributed to Ms. Weisser’s piece in The Spectator, commenting on the objects—what is described as an “apparent spontaneous formation of chips and circuitry in mRNA vaccines when left at room temperature, and the abnormal objects that can be seen in the blood of vaccinated people.”
Dr. Hoy passed along the story to TrialSite’s founder Daniel O’Connor, and the two spoke on the phone for this article.
Hoy contributed much to clinical trials in the United States: she developed decades ago at Lovelace Medical Foundation in New Mexico a clinical/epidemiologic database from administrative datasets of the affiliating hospital and clinic bringing real-world data to clinical trials before it was commonplace.
Hoy said to Daniel O’Connor, “Dr. Nixon’s findings are most certainly disturbing and seem to confirm other comparable observations from scientists and doctors studying both the mRNA vaccine vial contents as well as the blood of COVID-19 vaccinated persons in other parts of the world.”
Dr. Hoy continued, emphasizing to TrialSite:
“We cannot rush to any conclusions here, but rather, governments should initiate a proper, well-designed testing program to investigate, examine, and validate, or not, these independent findings. Given the magnitude and scale of the vaccination programs, including legal mandates, people around the world need to know what’s in the vaccines.”
As far as the observations in the blood samples of COVID-19 vaccinated from Italy and elsewhere, Dr. Hoy suggested to The Spectrum reporter that if accurate, they are “undoubtedly contributing to poor oxygen delivery to tissues and clotting events, including heart attacks and strokes.” Hoy mentioned in both The Spectator piece as well as in her discussion with TrialSite’s O’Connor that there is an urgent need for investigation, not only into post-COVID-19 vaccine injuries but also any potential role for the emergency countermeasures in what has become a disturbing rise in mortality in Australia.
TrialSite was perhaps the only media worldwide reporting earlier in 2022 that a disturbing number of deaths were occurring in heavily vaccinated Australia. More than double the number of Australians died in the first three-and-a-half months of 2022 than in all of 2020 and 2021 combined. That article can be found here.
We here at TrialSite sincerely hope the accumulating number of COVID-19 vaccine-related bizarre microscopic images turn out to be something harmless and not material.
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/wots-in-the-shots/
“What is in the Pfizer vaccines? Recently, Dr David Nixon, a Brisbane GP, decided to find out, putting droplets of vaccine and the blood of vaccinated patients under a dark-field microscope.
That’s a more radical decision than it might sound. According to Sasha Latypova, a scientist with 25 years of experience in clinical trials for pharmaceutical companies, the contract between Pfizer and the US government prohibits independent researchers from studying the vaccines. They claim it would ‘divert’ these precious resources away from their intended use fulfilling an ‘urgent’ need.
Is that true in Australia? Who knows? All the Commonwealth Department of Health has said about its contract with Pfizer is that it is commercial-in-confidence.
The Therapeutic Goods Administration performs tests on all Covid vaccines for composition and strength, purity and integrity, identity and endotoxins, but it provides scant details other than the batch numbers tested and whether they passed. (Spoiler alert: they did.)
In the US, the Centers for Disease Control specifically states that all Covid-19 vaccines are free from ‘metals, such as iron, nickel, cobalt, lithium, and rare earth alloys’ and ‘manufactured products such as micro-electronics, electrodes, carbon nanotubes, and nanowire semiconductors’.
Notably, this list does not include graphene oxide which has been widely investigated for biomedical applications. Some researchers sing its praises, its ‘ultra-high drug-loading efficiency due to the wide surface area’, its exceptional ‘chemical and mechanical constancy, sublime conductivity and excellent biocompatibility’. But there’s a catch. ‘The toxic effect of graphene oxide on living cells and organs’ is ‘a limiting factor’ on its use in the medicine.
So is there graphene oxide in the Pfizer shots? What Nixon found, and filmed, is bizarre to say the least. Inside a droplet of vaccine are strange mechanical structures. They seem motionless at first but when Nixon used time-lapse photography to condense 48 hours of footage into two minutes, it showed what appear to be mechanical arms assembling and disassembling glowing rectangular structures that look like circuitry and micro chips. These are not ‘manufactured products’ in the CDC’s words because they construct and deconstruct themselves but the formation of the crystals seems to be stimulated by electromagnetic radiation and stops when the slide with the vaccine is shielded by a Faraday bag. Nixon’s findings are similar to those of teams in New Zealand, Germany, Spain and South Korea.
An Italian group led by Riccardo Benzi Cipelli analysed the blood of over 1,000 people, one month after they were vaccinated, who had been referred for tests because they had experienced side effects. They ranged in age from 15 to 85 and had had between one and three doses. More than 94 per cent had abnormal readings, deformed red blood cells, reduced in counts and clumped around luminescent foreign objects which also attracted clusters of fibrin. Some of the foreign objects dotted the blood like a starry night, some self-assembled into crystalline structures and others into spindly branches and tubes.
The Italians think the objects are metallic particles and say they resemble ‘graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds’. They believe the damaged blood is contributing to post-vaccine coagulation disorders, which in turn contribute to increased malignancies, while graphene-family materials are associated with oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammation and damage to those parts of the immune system that suppress tumours.
The artificial mRNA concoction which is ‘cloaked’ from the recipient’s immune system is also likely to reduce the recipients immune function, increasing the likelihood of new or recurring tumours.
Nixon has shared his findings with Wendy Hoy, professor of medicine at the University of Queensland who has called on the Australian government and its health authorities to explain the apparent spontaneous formation of chips and circuitry in mRNA vaccines when left at room temperature, and the abnormal objects that can be seen in the blood of vaccinated people. Hoy thinks that these are ‘undoubtedly contributing to poor oxygen delivery to tissues and clotting events, including heart attacks and strokes’ and asks why there is no systematic autopsy investigation of deaths to investigate the role of the vaccine in Australia’s dramatic rise in mortality.
According to the latest data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, excess mortality was over 17 per cent in July. It is similarly elevated in other highly vaccinated populations.
In Germany, excess mortality in people over 60 increased by 174 per cent between 20 September 2021, when 85 per cent of people over 60 were fully vaccinated, and October 2022.
In the UK, there have been more excess deaths in the last three months than at any time during the pandemic or indeed since 2010. In the most recent week, excess mortality in England was 16 per cent.
In the US, excess mortality in people aged 25 to 44, and in those aged 75 to 84, is 18 per cent, and it is 15 per cent in those aged 65 to 74.
The situation is all the more alarming because there should be fewer deaths now, since so many people died earlier in the pandemic. There has also been a dramatic rise in people with disabilities.
As for Covid, in Australia, vaccine efficacy appears to be negative, judging by the statistics in NSW which are far from perfect but the best in Australia. They show that 88 per cent of people who died were vaccinated even though they made up only 85.5 per cent of the population. They also showed that the unvaccinated made up only 0.15 per cent of people in hospital with Covid and only 1.1 per cent of people in ICU.
Why is this? Almost certainly, because the unvaccinated who die of Covid in NSW are frail and elderly with multiple comorbidities, living in aged care or palliative care or at home, and don’t go to hospital. Why weren’t they vaccinated? Probably because they or their doctors feared it would kill them.
The question is, how many others is it killing too? Until health authorities tell us what’s in the shots, we won’t know.”
Perhaps then, we will know what is causing the weird blood clots?