The internet, being an electronic creation is vulnerable to solar storms, which have the capacity to bring down the entire electrical grid, as well as the internet, producing what has been called an “intent apocalypse.” This is detailed below. But it is worse than that, as a powerful solar storm narrowly missed the Earth on March 12, 2023. Here is what would have happened if it had hit:
“What happened on March 12 was similar to the 1859 outburst – only worse. Early estimates suggest that this explosion was ten to a hundred times more powerful than the one of 1859. Such events – if not quite so extreme -- are not uncommon. One serious difference from 1859 was that explosion took place on the side of the sun facing away from earth. If it had been facing in our direction, if the earth had borne the full brunt of that blast, we can scarcely imagine the results. It’s likely that all operating electrical systems would have been immediately destroyed, the same as the telegraph systems in 1859. Any active electronic instruments – and possibly even those that happened to be shut down – would have been fried, transformed into useless hunks of plastic, metal, and silicon. The electrical and electronic networks (e.g., the Net) that form the framework of Third Millennial civilization would have been annihilated. Once they were destroyed, all power would vanish. Industry would grind to a halt. Massive amounts of data, including almost all financial data, would simply disappear. All methods of communication beyond voice range would no longer exist. It wouldn’t be a matter of waiting to be rescued by a government of any sort. Government would have shrunk to little more than a notion. The very tools on which relief, and even recovery, depend would simply have vanished. The consequences beggar the imagination. A new Dark Age would have been the best option to expect.”
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/03/dodging_the_apocalypse.html
Of course, the world’s grids must be hardened to deal with CME, but it is an issue of whether this can be done to deal with super-powerful events such as the above.
“It sounds like the stuff of sci-fi. Magnetic fields unleashed by a solar superstorm rip through Earth’s magnetosphere, sending currents surging through human infrastructure. Aurora borealis unusually fill southern skies with shimmering blues and greens. We look up from our phones and computers to catch a glimpse, and the internet as we know it blinks out.
Physically, most of us are fine. But in a matter of hours, we are boomeranged back to the analog era, where the only thing that tweets is the bird outside our window.
The “internet apocalypse,” as it’s called, has recently captured imaginations on social media, prompting quick-spreading misinformation about nonexistent NASA warnings and speculation about what the hyper-online might do with themselves in an offline world. Apocalypse preppers, religious doomsday Redditors and writers have all, at some point, seized on the idea.
The sun is crackling with ‘solar flares’. Here’s what that means.
And it’s easy to understand the intrigue. Virtually every aspect of human life is bound up in the internet, and its absence could have disastrous consequences — not to mention that many of us can barely stand a 30-second elevator ride without WiFi.
But drama aside, these concerns are not entirely fiction. A widespread internet outage could, indeed, be brought on by a strong solar storm hitting Earth — a rare but very real event that has not yet happened in the digital age, experts say. When a solar storm known as the Carrington Event struck in 1859, telegraph lines sparked, operators were electrocuted and the northern lights descended to latitudes as low as Jamaica. A 1989 solar storm took out the Quebec power grid for hours. And in 2012, a storm just missed Earth.
As the sun, which has roughly 11-year cycles, enters a particularly active period known as the “solar maximum” in 2025, some are worried our interconnected world is not prepared.
Satellite captures dramatic solar storm erupting over star cluster
Sangeetha Abdu Jyothi, a computer science professor at University of California at Irvine whose paper “Solar Superstorms: Planning for an Internet Apocalypse” has played a role in popularizing the term, started thinking about internet resilience when the coronavirus began to spread, and she realized how unprepared we were for a pandemic. Research on widespread internet failure was scant.
“We’ve never experienced one of the extreme case events, and we don’t know how our infrastructure would respond to it,” Jyothi said. “Our failure testing doesn’t even include such scenarios.”
She notes that a severe solar storm is likely to affect large-scale infrastructure such as submarine communication cables, which could interrupt long-distance connectivity. If you have not lost power, you might have access to, say, a government website hosted locally, but reaching bigger websites, which could have data stored all over the place, might not be possible.
The northern latitudes are also especially vulnerable to solar storms, and that’s where a lot of internet infrastructure is concentrated. “This is not taken into account in our infrastructure deployment today at all,” she said.
Such outages could last for months, depending on the scale and how long it takes to repair the damage. The economic impact of just one day of lost connectivity in the United States alone is estimated to be more than $11 billion, according to the internet watcher NetBlocks.
Still, Jyothi says she has felt bad for using the term “internet apocalypse” in her paper. There’s not much ordinary people can do to prepare for such a phenomenon; it falls on governments and companies. And the paper “just got too much attention,” she said.
“Researchers have been talking for a long time about how this could affect the power grid,” she notes, “but that doesn’t scare people to the same extent for some reason.” Losing power also causes one to lose internet, of course.
The recent online panic appears to have been sparked by recent discoveries from the Parker Solar Probe, a NASA device launched in 2018 to research the physics of the sun and the solar atmosphere — not to keep the WiFi from going out, as TikTok would have you think.
A few weeks ago, scientists published new evidence from the probe about the source of solar winds, which they say are the result of a phenomenon called “magnetic reconnection.” While the research did not look specifically at solar storms, it has broader relevance. The solar atmosphere changes very slowly, says Stuart D. Bale, a physics professor at the University of California at Berkeley and a principal investigator for NASA working on the probe. So “anytime something changes really fast magnetically on the sun, it’s probably due to reconnection.”
Coronal mass ejections, expulsions of plasma and magnetic fields that can power damaging solar storms, occur over a short time frame and are probably a part of this mechanism, he said.
“The more we know about magnetic reconnection on the sun,” Bale said “the more predictive power it’s going to give us for space weather.”
Speaking while on a trip to Japan, Bale said he understands the sort of panic the “internet apocalypse” idea instills. “My wife has gone up to some town three hours from here. And the only way she knows her way back is with her phone, and we don’t have any cash,” he said. “It could really be a mess.”
But typically, Bale doesn’t worry about solar storms too much. “In some ways, I’d rather be growing my own potatoes in the countryside, not using a mobile phone,” he said.”