The Hope Accord, reproduced below, has been signed by over 45,000 people, including doctors and healthcare workers. It calls for the immediate suspension of the Covid mRNA vaxxes: "A growing body of evidence suggests that the widespread rollout of the novel Covid-19 mRNA vaccine products is contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths. The association observed between the vaccine rollout and these concerning trends is now supported by additional significant findings. These include the discovery of plausible biological mechanisms of harm demonstrated in laboratory and autopsy studies, as well as high rates of adverse events seen in randomised clinical trials and national surveillance programs. Altogether, these observations indicate a causal link."
It was started that the Covid vaxxes were given emergency authorisation, but that reason is no longer relevant, so the burden of proof is now upon health authorities to show that the vaccines are not harmful. Independent studies need to be undertaken.
As well, the vaccine injured need to be adequately compensated, as they took this vaccine to be able to participate in social practices after draconian lockdowns that essentially forced people to be vaccinated. While all this has been said before, the number of signatures now includes 1,400 medical doctors, which is something which was not seen a few years ago. The Covid justice movement continues to grow. The issue must not be let to go down the memory hole as 17 million people alone died from just the vax.
https://lettersfromaustralia.substack.com/p/thousands-of-health-experts-call
"More than 45,000 people including 5000 healthcare workers have urgently called for the covid mRNA gene-vaccines to be suspended on safety grounds in a new initiative launched on July 3.
Among those signing on to the Hope Accord are more than 1400 medical doctors.
The accord calls for the immediate suspension of all covid mRNA gene-vaccines on the grounds that a growing body of evidence shows the controversial products are contributing to an alarming rise in disability and death.
"The association observed between the vaccine rollout and these concerning trends is now supported by additional significant findings," the accord states.
The accord calls for a comprehensive re-evaluation, immediate recognition and support for the injured, and the restoration of ethical principles abandoned during covid including informed consent and bodily autonomy.
Among the highly respected signatories is US physician Joseph Fraiman, one of the authors of a peer-reviewed paper in the journal Vaccine that re-analysed Pfizer and Moderna's trial data and found a 1-in-800 serious adverse event rate. The influential study has been cited 195 times.
UK pathologist Claire Craig, another key signatory of the accord, said the gene-vaccine injured were still getting abuse instead of help.
"The thing that upsets me the most … is that I genuinely believed these people would be getting better and that they'd be mostly better by now," she told Dr John Campbell in an interview uploaded to YouTube on July 19.
"But they're really not. There's a few that are, but the vast majority are still incredibly sick and I find that really depressing … that they're still no better off, and that there are so many of them."
Ms Craig pointed out that the known injuries - alarming as they are - are just the tip of the iceberg because not everyone realises that the gene-vaccine caused their illness.
Australia's drug safety system relies largely on self-reporting to the Database of Adverse Event Notifications.
However, due to overwhelming propaganda and censorship during the covid pandemic, both the public and doctors were discouraged from suspecting the gene-vaccines could be harmful. Many did not know they were supposed to report despite the products being only provisionally registered for the two key years of the pandemic. Both doctors and patients simply blamed other causes.
As a result, Australia's drug regulator the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) cannot know the exact number of people who have been injured and killed by these products.
Australia's Department of Health and Aged Care refuses to release the raw all-cause mortality data stratified by gene-vaccine status and age, which is the only reliable metric that can show the true extent of the problem after the Pfizer and Moderna clinical trials destroyed their control groups by offering them the products in December 2020.
Letters From Australia asked the TGA if they would consider suspending the mRNA platform, given the growing and urgent calls - and if not, then why not.
Instead of answering the question, the TGA responded with links to its website and email newsletter.
Letters From Australia also asked the TGA, part of the Department of Health and Aged Care, about the apparent conflict of interest in getting procurement advice from the chair of CEPI, an organisation tied to Big Pharma interests, whose stated mission is to promote the mRNA gene-vaccine platform.
THE HOPE ACCORD
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS, SCIENTISTS AND CONCERNED MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, CALL FOR:
1. THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE COVID-19 mRNA VACCINE PRODUCTS
A growing body of evidence suggests that the widespread rollout of the novel Covid-19 mRNA vaccine products is contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths.
The association observed between the vaccine rollout and these concerning trends is now supported by additional significant findings. These include the discovery of plausible biological mechanisms of harm demonstrated in laboratory and autopsy studies, as well as high rates of adverse events seen in randomised clinical trials and national surveillance programs. Altogether, these observations indicate a causal link.
This new technology was granted emergency use authorisation to address a situation that no longer exists. Going forward, the burden of proof falls on those still advocating for these products to compellingly demonstrate that they aren't resulting in net harm. Until such evidence is presented, regulators should suspend their use as a matter of standard medical precaution.
2. A COMPREHENSIVE RE-EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ALL COVID-19 VACCINE PRODUCTS
Independent investigations must be properly resourced to allow a comprehensive re-evaluation of all Covid-19 vaccine products.
There must be a full exploration of mechanisms of harm to provide insight into their impact on the human body, both short and long term. Effectiveness must be reassessed through a comprehensive review of actual clinical impact on illness and mortality, as opposed to synthetic results based on modelled assumptions.
We call on the scientific community to come forward with findings from unpublished Covid-19 vaccine studies. This will help mitigate publication bias, whereby unfavourable results were often rejected or withheld due to fears of reputational damage. Crucially, government bodies and the pharmaceutical industry must also provide full transparency, granting access to previously undisclosed anonymised patient-level data from clinical trials and surveillance programs.
These cumulative actions will help determine any real world benefit of these products versus the true extent of the damage caused.
3. THE IMMEDIATE RECOGNITION AND SUPPORT FOR THE VACCINE-INJURED
The denial of vaccine injury is a betrayal of those who followed official directives, often under coercion from mandates restricting their access to work, education, travel, hospitality and sports.
The vaccine-injured must be recognised and every effort made to understand their conditions. Support should include readily accessible multidisciplinary clinics offering investigation and treatment as well as appropriate compensation for all those who have been harmed.
4. THE RESTORATION OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES ABANDONED DURING THE COVID-19 ERA
Fundamental and cherished principles of medical ethics were disregarded on the premise of an emergency. These included: 'first do no harm', informed consent, bodily autonomy and the notion that adults protect children – not the other way around. The precautionary principle was inverted. Also, particularly concerning was the erosion of free speech – a democratic principle that underpinned the ability to question untested interventions whilst ensuring other principles were upheld. The consequence was exposing the public, especially healthy young people – including children – to unacceptable risks of harm.
Emergencies are never a reason to abandon our principles; it is precisely at such times that we most profoundly depend on them. Only after acknowledging they were wrongly abandoned can we commit to upholding them consistently and in doing so, better protect future generations.
5. ADDRESSING THE ROOT CAUSES OF OUR CURRENT PREDICAMENT The medical profession must lead by admitting we lost our way.
By drawing attention to these medical and ethical issues surrounding the Covid-19 response, we hope to validate and amplify the call to establish the relevant facts and ensure vital lessons are learned.
An honest and thorough investigation is needed, addressing the root causes that have led us to this place, including institutional groupthink, conflicts of interest and the suppression of scientific debate.
We ultimately seek a renewed commitment to the core principles of ethical medicine, returning to an era in which we strive for transparency, accountability and responsible decision-making throughout the spheres of medicine and public health."