Recent evidence uncovered by UK researchers has indicated that Pfizer's mRNA shots can cause cells to produce "off-target" proteins, due to a fault in the Covid vax. These faulty proteins have been called "Pfrankenstein" proteins. The details, as expected are complex and outlined by Dr Mercola below, but for our purposes we note that the glitch arose from the way that the vaccines were genetically modified. It should have been noticed that there was the possibility of genetic errors occurring, but Operation Warp Speed, prevented the need initial scrutiny. Thus, there lies the potential for various health risks, including immune function deficiencies.
It is but another page in the book of woes of the Covid plandemic.
"The toxic spike protein produced in your body if you receive a COVID-19 shot is not the only health concern to be aware of. Pfizer's mRNA COVID-19 shots also instruct cells to produce additional "off-target" proteins that could pose significant health risks.
The finding was revealed by a team of U.K. researchers1 who found a "glitch" occurred due to the way the COVID-19 shots were genetically modified. As a result, unwanted proteins are produced, with unknown effects — a phenomenon that should have been detected long before the experimental shots were given to millions of people.
Modified mRNA in COVID-19 Shots Is 'Prone to Reading Errors'
Ribosomes decode mRNA in cells, but about 8% of the time those in COVID-19 shots may misread the coded instructions, Maryanne Demasi, Ph.D., a former medical scientist with the University of Adelaide and former reporter for ABC News in Australia, explains:2
"The researchers say that ribosomes, which are responsible for decoding the mRNA in cells, can slip and misread the coded instructions about 8% of the time — known as 'ribosomal frameshifting.' They say the 'glitch' has to do with how the mRNA in the vaccine has been genetically modified.
Unlike naturally-occurring mRNA, the mRNA that exists in the vaccines has had a 'uridine' base replaced with a 'N1-methyl pseudouridine' (to stabilize it) and unfortunately, has made it prone to reading errors."
In May 2021, I interviewed Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at MIT for over five decades, about the likely hazards of replacing the uracil in the RNA used in the COVID shots with synthetic methylpseudouridine.3 This process of substituting letters in the genetic code is known as codon optimization, which is known to be problematic.
At the time, Seneff predicted the shots would cause a rise in prion, autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases and, at younger ages, blood disorders and heart failure. One of the primary reasons for this is because they genetically manipulated the RNA in the shots with synthetic methylpseudouridine, which enhances RNA stability by inhibiting its breakdown.
Now, researchers at Cambridge University and the Universities of Kent, Oxford and Liverpool, have discovered4 that the use of methylpseudouridine results in a high rate of ribosomal "frameshifting," which causes your cells to produce off-target proteins with unknown effects. In an interview with Demasi, research scientist David Wiseman explained the concerning findings:5
"They found the Pfizer vaccine can cause your cells to make proteins that they are not supposed to make — you end up with what I call 'Pfrankenstein proteins.' … Imagine the following three-letter English words ABE DAN TEA TON ERA TWO — the letters are like the code on the mRNA. Now instead of starting to read the sentence at the letter 'A' of the first word, you frameshift to the next letter — the letter 'B.'
That means that all the other letters are shifted to the left and it will give you a new sentence with three-letter words BED ANT EAT ONE RAT etcetera. So, the new words have a completely different meaning from the original words. This is what happened in the body of some people vaccinated with Pfizer's product. New unwanted 'off-target' proteins were produced, that actually led to an 'off-target' immune response."
Your Body Is Being Hijacked to Produce 'Pfrankenstein' Proteins
According to the study, off-target cellular immune responses occur in 25% to 33% of those who have received Pfizer's COVID-19 shot. "It means their lymphocytes had seen the proteins before — their immune system had already been primed from a prior exposure, presumably after that person had received the mRNA vaccine," Wiseman said.6
The study authors stated there were no adverse outcomes related to the "frameshifted products," and the media has similarly downplayed any risk of harm. However, molecular virologist David Speicher Ph.D., told Trial Site News reporter Sonia Elijah:7
"Whenever our cells create an abundance of unintended proteins or prevent production of appropriate proteins it could lead to an unintended immune response with a huge potential to cause harm."
Wiseman was also clear in his explanation that the "Pfrankenstein" proteins could potentially lead to health problems, including autoimmune conditions or endocrine disruption. He told Demasi:8
"What you have to realize is that your body is being hijacked, not just to produce spike protein, but also to produce other, what I call, 'Pfrankenstein' proteins that are completely uncharacterized. We don't know what they are, what they do, for how long they're made or how long they last in the body, and we have no idea what their toxicity is.
From the Nature paper however, we do know that these unwanted proteins elicit immune reactions in the body.
… These researchers showed that frameshifting could create chimeric proteins. Basically, as the ribosome reads the code for the spike protein, it may slip in the middle of reading the code. So, the first half is spike protein, and the second half is a Pfrankenstein protein.
Now, just imagine one half can still attach to the ACE2 receptor on cells but on the other end, you've got this Pfrankenstein protein dangling outside of the cells. Your immune system is going to destroy the cell because it looks foreign, and now you've got something that looks like an autoimmune condition.
Or you could have a protein that turns out to be not necessarily identical, but sufficiently similar to another protein in our body like a hormone and it ends up mimicking the hormone's activity and disturbing your endocrine system."
Reading Errors Could Be Reduced — So Why Weren't They?
While claiming that frameshifted products weren't harmful, the Nature study authors stated it was important for future mRNA technologies to reduce ribosome frameshifting events. They suggested that they could identify the garbled sites or sequences and alter the mRNA sequence to reduce such effects in the future.9
But as Wiseman pointed out, this should have been done already. "This work should've been done by the vaccine manufacturers and by the regulators before the product was authorized and given to billions of people. They've asked people to take a vaccine, and put it into children and they have no clue what is happening inside the body."10
Further, the study authors are basing their assessment that there's no risk posed by these 'Pfrankenstein proteins' on just 21 people. Wiseman continued to Demasi:11
"The authors wrote, '... there is no evidence that frameshifted products in humans generated from BNT162b2 vaccination are associated with adverse outcomes.' But they only looked at 21 people who received Pfizer's vaccine, so you cannot call that a serious safety study by any stretch of the imagination.
And how did they select these people? The volunteers were part of another government funded study and had not reported undue effects from vaccination. Since they did not study subjects who had reported adverse vaccine effects, the selection of participants was probably biased.
… What they're trying to say now is that there have been no problems identified in 21 people, but in the future there may be problems, so we should just keep studying it. Are you kidding me? What they're saying is that 'we will inject you first and ask safety questions later.' It's not good enough."
It's worth noting that two of the researchers on the team have a pending patent application for mRNA technology,12 so they certainly have reason to downplay the problem and propose all we need to do is a bit of tweaking and all will be well moving forward.
Is Foreign DNA Integrating Into Human Cells?
Along with Pfizer's Pfrankenstein proteins, there's potential that DNA integration from COVID-19 shots could pose a risk to the human genome. Tucker Carlson spoke with Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo, who has called for an end to the use of COVID-19 mRNA shots, citing concerns about DNA fragments in the products.13
"Could foreign DNA enter your cells through the mRNA COVID vax and change your DNA — and humanity itself — forever? Sounds nutty. It's not," Carlson tweeted. "Absolutely that could happen," says Dr. Joseph Ladapo, the surgeon general of Florida.14 In a December 6, 2023, letter sent to the U.S. FDA and CDC, Ladapo outlined findings showing the presence of lipid nanoparticle complexes and simian virus 40 (SV40) promoter/enhancer DNA.
While there are limits on how much DNA can be in a vaccine due to concern over DNA integration, the guidelines don't consider lipid nanoparticles and other factors in COVID-19 shots that could enhance how much DNA can enter a cell.
"Lipid nanoparticles are an efficient vehicle for delivery of the mRNA in the COVID-19 vaccines into human cells and may therefore be an equally efficient vehicle for delivering contaminant DNA into human cells. The presence of SV40 promoter/enhancer DNA may also pose a unique and heightened risk of DNA integration into human cells," according to a news release from the Florida Department of Health (DOH).15
In a 2023 preprint study, microbiologist Kevin McKernan — a former researcher and team leader for the MIT Human Genome project16 — and colleagues assessed the nucleic acid composition of four expired vials of the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA shots. "DNA contamination that exceeds the European Medicines Agency (EMA) 330ng/mg requirement and the FDAs 10ng/dose requirements" was found.17
So, in addition to the spike protein and mRNA in COVID-19 shots, McKernan's team discovered SV40 promoters that, for decades, have been suspected of causing cancer in humans.18 Further, according to the Florida DOH, the FDA's own 2007 guidance states:19
"DNA integration could theoretically impact a human's oncogenes – the genes which can transform a healthy cell into a cancerous cell.
DNA integration may result in chromosomal instability.
The Guidance for Industry discusses biodistribution of DNA vaccines and how such integration could affect unintended parts of the body including blood, heart, brain, liver, kidney, bone marrow, ovaries/testes, lung, draining lymph nodes, spleen, the site of administration and subcutis at injection site."
The FDA responded to Ladapo's letter December 14, 2023, but provided no evidence that appropriate DNA integration assessments had been conducted. Ladapo called for a halt in their use as a result.20 "It starts at crazy but it ends at somewhere else that someone could be just so nonchalant and, frankly, willy-nilly, with something as precious and as sacred as our human DNA," Ladapo told Carlson.21"