Fresh intelligence in 2025 paints a stark picture: the nationwide anti-Trump protests—over 1,200 demonstrations erupting across all 50 states—are not the organic outcry they appear to be, but a calculated "colour revolution" campaign, meticulously bankrolled by billionaire-funded NGOs, militant unions, and far-Left activist networks. Ostensibly sparked by Trump's immigration crackdowns, federal downsizing, and new tariffs, these protests, which flared up over a single weekend, mask a deeper agenda. Geospatial analysts and protest-tracking firms reveal a troubling truth: these aren't grassroots uprisings but heavily coordinated efforts, driven by professional activists, repeat rally-goers, and groups tied to Democratic operatives and even foreign influence networks. The goal, it seems, is not mere dissent but destabilisation, a soft coup cloaked in social justice rhetoric, aiming to paralyse Trump's administration, wage psychological warfare, and, if all else fails, force regime change akin to Ukraine's 2014 Maidan uprising.
The evidence of this orchestration is chillingly precise. Data scientist Tony Seruga, wielding GPS tracking and protest metrics, uncovered a "rent-a-mob" pipeline at a recent Chicago rally. Organisers boasted 30,000 attendees, but his real-time telemetry clocked just 7,500 unique participants, 92% of whom had marched in five or more prior events, from Kamala Harris campaign stops to BLM-Antifa riots and pro-Hamas demonstrations. In Denver, the pattern held: 84% of protesters had hit at least nine rallies, with 31% logging 20 or more, a clear sign of professional activism rather than spontaneous outrage. Portland's police reports tell a similar tale—a core group of 200-300 agitators cycles through "local" protests, many pocketing stipends from activist nonprofits. This isn't a groundswell; it's a machine, inflating crowds with paid or bussed-in bodies to project a national uprising that doesn't exist.
Behind this machine lurk the key players, their coffers brimming with dark money—untraceable funds flowing through opaque channels. The Indivisible Project, a 501(c)(4) nonprofit co-founded by former Democratic congressional staffers, stands out as a linchpin. Linked to civil disobedience training ahead of the 2024 election, it's pocketed over $7 million since 2018 from George Soros's Open Society Foundations (OSF), funnelled through the Democracy Alliance, a shadowy hub for progressive donors. Indivisible's "Resist Trump" events and federal building occupations amplify the unrest, a playbook straight from their post-2016 origins. Then there's the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), openly preaching "revolutionary socialism" and pouring resources into occupation-style protests. DSA taps ActBlue, a Democratic fundraising platform tied to Soros and tech mogul Reid Hoffman, channelling millions through 501(c)(4) loopholes—exact figures stay murky, but the scale is undeniable. The American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) adds a darker twist, facing a federal lawsuit for allegedly serving as Hamas's U.S. propaganda arm. AMP orchestrated a D.C. rally glorifying terrorists like Walid Daqqa, a Palestinian convicted of torturing and murdering an Israeli soldier, and Hossam Shabat, a Hamas sniper moonlighting as an Al Jazeera "journalist." Its funding traces to the Tides Foundation—seeded by Soros and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund with $1.2 million from NYC contracts alone since 2010—and hints at ties to Muslim Brotherhood networks, though hard proof remains elusive.
George Soros looms large over this web. His Open Society Foundations have sunk $32 billion into progressive causes since 1984, with $140 million hitting political advocacy in 2021 alone via the Open Society Policy Center, a 501(c)(4) arm. The money flows through layered nonprofits—Tides, Democracy Alliance, Sixteen Thirty Fund under Arabella Advisors—obscuring its origins as it lands with Indivisible, DSA, and AMP. Critics call Soros the puppet master of destabilisation, though OSF insists it's just championing "democracy and human rights" transparently. Militant unions like SEIU and AFT, partners in anti-Trump coalitions, chip in too, tapping dues and dark money pools via groups like the Working Families Party. ActBlue, accused on X of laundering cash through retirees' names, funnels funds to far-Left outfits like Troublemakers and Rise & Resist, adding more untraceable layers. Even USAID, once a player in overseas colour revolutions, sits on the sidelines, Trump's 83% budget slash per Rubio shifts the burden entirely to private cash.
The protests themselves bear the marks of this funding. In D.C., AMP's pro-Hamas rally devolved into vandalism, arson, and chants of "From the river to the sea," with murals honouring terrorists splashed across walls—DSA-backed chaos followed suit in Portland and Chicago, where paid agitators allegedly stoked the flames. Democratic elites cheer it on: Bernie Sanders and Jamie Raskin hail the unrest as a "moral uprising," echoing 2020 when MSNBC's Rachel Maddow bragged of activists "working in lockstep" with party brass. That year, forensic audits exposed massive NGO funding, freelance agitator networks, and foreign dark money behind the BLM-Antifa riots—now, the playbook's back, with manufactured outrage, media hype, and a deliberate undermining of law enforcement. "Defund the Police" cuts leave agencies understaffed, and the National Guard's corporate security gigs sap their riot response, setting cities up for instability—the precise outcome these groups crave.
What makes this "dark money"? It's the opacity—501(c)(4)s like Indivisible and DSA dodge donor disclosure, ActBlue and Tides act as pass-throughs, and Soros's $32 billion empire dwarfs public donations, twisting the "grassroots" narrative into a lie. Alleged Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas links hint at foreign cash, though the AMP lawsuit offers more suspicion than proof. The scale is staggering: unions, billionaires, and layered nonprofits flood the system, far outpacing any organic drive. Yet Trump's approval defies the chaos—53% nationally, with a 13-point youth voter spike since March—suggesting the "national uprising" is a mirage. The real agenda, the text argues, is threefold: paralyse Trump's governance with perpetual unrest, demoralise conservative voters through riots and media panic, and push regime change by proxy if elections fail.
This isn't about policy spats, it's a manufactured division, a rerun of 2020's "Summer of Love" riots and post-election shutdown plans, now reactivated with precision. The unrest isn't organic; it's funded, calculated, and meant to destroy, whether through mass protests, media psyops, or federal occupations. The implications are grim: a soft coup attempt, cloaked in justice rhetoric, exploiting understaffed police and a polarised nation. Critics might overreach—Soros's influence is real, but a cohesive "coup" or foreign masterplan lacks hard evidence; correlation isn't causation. Still, the data—geofencing, NGO grants, ActBlue flows—lays bare a coordinated effort. For ordinary Americans, it's a wake-up call: the silent majority let this happen once in 2020. The question now is whether they'll stand by again as dark money tries to rewrite the nation's fate.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-04-07-dark-money-fuels-anti-trump-color-revolution.html
Nationwide anti-Trump demonstrations are not spontaneous but part of a calculated "color revolution" campaign funded by NGOs, unions and far-left networks.
Data shows many protesters are repeat participants, suggesting organized efforts with paid or bussed-in agitators.
Groups like Indivisible Project, Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) are central players. Some have ties to foreign influence networks, including Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.
Some protests featured displays honoring militants involved in attacks, alongside vandalism and arson. Democratic leaders like Bernie Sanders and Jamie Raskin have publicly endorsed the demonstrations.
The same strategies from the 2020 BLM-Antifa riots are being reused: NGO funding, media amplification and undermining law enforcement. "Defund the Police" policies and understaffed agencies leave cities vulnerable to destabilization.
Fresh intelligence suggests the nationwide anti-Trump protests are not organic expressions of public dissent but a calculated "color revolution" campaign — bankrolled by billionaire-funded NGOs, militant unions and far-left activist networks. Over the weekend, more than 1,200 demonstrations erupted across all 50 states, ostensibly protesting President Donald Trump's immigration policies, federal downsizing and new tariffs. However, geospatial analysts and protest-tracking firms have uncovered a troubling pattern: these crowds are not grassroots but heavily coordinated—dominated by professional activists, repeat rally attendees and groups with direct ties to Democrat operatives and foreign influence networks.
Geofencing data exposes the "rent-a-mob" pipeline
Tony Seruga, a data scientist specializing in GPS tracking and protest metrics, found that at a recent Chicago rally, 92% of attendees had participated in five or more prior demonstrations — including Kamala Harris campaign events, BLM-Antifa riots and pro-Hamas protests. Organizers boasted 30,000 attendees, but Seruga's real-time telemetry showed only 7,500 unique participants, indicating artificial crowd inflation via paid or bussed-in agitators.
Similar patterns emerged in Denver, where 84% of protesters had attended at least nine prior rallies, and 31% had been to 20+ events — a clear hallmark of professional activism rather than spontaneous outrage. In Portland, police reports revealed that the same core group of 200-300 agitators cycled through multiple "local" protests, with many receiving stipends from activist nonprofits.
The key players behind the unrest
Among the primary organizers driving this campaign:
Indivisible Project (501(c)(4)) – A well-funded activist hub co-founded by former Democratic congressional staffers, linked to planned civil disobedience training ahead of the 2024 election.
Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) – Openly advocates for "revolutionary socialism" and has funnelled resources into occupation-style protests, including recent takeovers of federal buildings.
American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) – Currently facing a federal lawsuit for allegedly serving as Hamas's U.S. propaganda arm, AMP has coordinated protests glorifying terrorists involved in the October 7th massacre.
Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups – Documents reveal financial and logistical ties between U.S.-based Islamist networks and foreign-backed destabilization efforts.
Terrorist glorification and escalating violence
In Washington, D.C., protesters at a concurrent pro-Hamas rally displayed murals of militants like Walid Daqqa — a Palestinian terrorist convicted of torturing and murdering an Israeli soldier in 1984 — and Hossam Shabat, a Hamas sniper who also worked as an Al Jazeera "journalist." Organized by AMP, the event devolved into vandalism, arson and chants of "From the river to the sea", while Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) praised the demonstrations as a "moral uprising."
A blueprint from 2020
The parallels to the BLM-Antifa riots of 2020 are impossible to ignore. Back then, Democrats and media elites openly coordinated with protest groups — MSNBC's Rachel Maddow bragged about activists "working in lockstep" with party leadership, while Indivisible's Ezra Levin falsely claimed the unrest was "bottom-up." Yet forensic audits later proved massive NGO funding, freelance agitator networks and even foreign dark money fuelled the chaos.
Now, the same playbook is being reused: manufactured outrage, media amplification, elite validation and the deliberate erosion of public trust in law enforcement. With the "Defund the Police" movement leaving agencies understaffed, and the National Guard increasingly deployed as private security for corporations, the stage is set for widespread instability — precisely the outcome these groups seek.
Trump's rising polls defy the narrative
Despite the relentless protest coverage, Trump's approval has surged to 53% nationally, with a 13-point spike among young voters since March — hardly reflective of the so-called "national uprising" narrative. Instead, the real agenda appears to be:
1.Destabilizing Trump's governance – Creating perpetual chaos to paralyze his administration and justify emergency measures.
2.Psychological warfare – Using riots, media panic and stochastic terrorism to demoralize conservative voters.
3.Regime change by proxy – If electoral defeat fails, forced resignation through unrest — akin to Ukraine's 2014 Maidan coup.
America's division is being manufactured
These protests are not about policy disagreements — they're a soft coup attempt, cloaked in social justice rhetoric. The same NGOs that orchestrated the 2020 "Summer of Love" riots and planned post-election shutdowns are now reactivating their networks.
For ordinary Americans, the takeaway is clear: The unrest isn't organic. It's funded, it's calculated and it's meant to destroy. Whether through mass protests, media psyops, or federal building occupations, the endgame remains regime change—by any means necessary.
The only question left is: Will the silent majority let it happen again?"