Social and covid plandemic critic Leo Hohmann, has written that the Covid mandates were an exercise in testing the scope and limits, if any, of public obedience, as a prelude to the technocratic New World Order that the World Economic Forum, among others are tireless working for. He refers us to the World Economic Forum "MY Carbon" page: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/09/my-carbon-an-approach-for-inclusive-and-sustainable-cities/:
"1. COVID-19 was the test of social responsibility – A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens across the world. There were numerous examples globally of maintaining social distancing, wearing masks, mass vaccinations and acceptance of contact-tracing applications for public health, which demonstrated the core of individual social responsibility."
Thus, it was not permitted for people to attend church services, but strip clubs were ok, he notes. People could not buy seeds, but anything from the big online sellers was also allowed. As he wrote, the whole thing was a test, as the Covid disease itself was a nothing burger, with high mortality being for the aged and immune-suppressed, as with the flu, which kills thousands each year in every jurisdiction.
The thing to note is that the Covid plandemic was a success, even though it faded out after the vaccinated got Covid, again and again. Still, the globalists know that with fear, and the big stick, the majority of the population can be controlled. While I could have told them that, Covid had the spin-off of enriching Big Pharma, so they just had to do it.
https://leohohmann.substack.com/p/world-economic-forum-finally-tells
"I have long said that Covid 19 was launched by design by a small number of people in the globalist predator class for one reason and one reason only — as a beta test for the coming technocratic new world order.
Now, we've got the World Economic Forum coming out and all but admitting that was exactly why the Covid-19 "pandemic" had to happen.
The WEF gleefully posted the following snippet to the "My Carbon" page of its website where they make a pitch for so-called smart cities, which is just another term for 15-minute cities.
The first of three "developments" that the WEF says must be in place before the world can evolve into its utopian vision of "smart and sustainable cities," is compliance with restrictions on our freedom. It writes:
1. COVID-19 was the test of social responsibility – A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens across the world. There were numerous examples globally of maintaining social distancing, wearing masks, mass vaccinations and acceptance of contact-tracing applications for public health, which demonstrated the core of individual social responsibility.
They were testing us. That's what Covid was all about. They wanted to see how many of us would give up our individual freedom and individual sovereignty by complying with a "new normal" that consisted of restrictions bordering on the absurd. Why, for instance was it "safe" to shop at Lowe's or Home Depot but unsafe to shop at a small business or attend church? Why was it OK to go to strip clubs in Michigan but you couldn't buy seeds for a garden?
What the WEF is implying with its above statement is that in order to be "sustainable," people and societies will need to be compliant with a new more authoritarian global order. Don't ask questions. Don't resort to logic. Just obey.
Would we be obedient in the face of idiotic new laws and regulations, like wearing face diapers to stop what was said to be an aerosolized virus, and standing six feet apart in public, and submitting to a never-before-used, unlicensed mRNA gene-based injection? They said it was good for you, so roll up your sleeve. Don't ask questions. If you did, you could lose your job and be treated as a societal outcast. Many people lost friends or even close family members to this monstrous "test" of our willingness to unquestioningly do what we're told.
Nearly five years later, arguably the most powerful nonprofit public-private partnership in the world, the WEF, admits it was all a test of our wills and celebrates the fact that most of us failed the test (or passed with flying colors depending how you look at it).
They wanted to find out how many of us would prove our servitude to the lawless, fascistic beast system by complying with "unimaginable restrictions," many of which were created out of thin air with absolutely no scientific evidence to back them up as contributing anything to public health.
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
The U.S. government's top health bureaucrat, Dr. Anthony Fauci, admitted recently that there was no science behind his decision to require Americans to socially distance six feet apart.
They just wanted to see how many of us would prove our fealty to the "authorities," people wearing white coats or suits and ties.
The beta test known as Covid-19 proved once again the validity of the The Milgram Experiment. This experiment was conducted in 1961-1962 by Yale University professor Stanley Milgram. It showed that the overwhelming majority of Americans would obey a law or command that they knew was wrong if the order were to come from an official authority figure. An alarming 65 percent of Americans would reluctantly violate their own conscience and obey the order even if they knew it would result in the death of an innocent person.
From Wikipedia:
Beginning on August 7, 1961, a series of social psychology experiments were conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram, who intended to measure the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts conflicting with their personal conscience. Participants were led to believe that they were assisting an unrelated experiment, in which they had to administer electric shocks to a "learner." These fake electric shocks gradually increased to levels that would have been fatal had they been real.
The experiments found, unexpectedly, that a very high proportion of subjects would fully obey the instructions, with every participant going up to 300 volts, and 65% going up to the full 450 volts. Milgram first described his research in a 1963 article in the Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology.