We all remember, not with any fondness the "six foot rule," of social distancing that was supposed to save people when they were in public, when the supposed pandemic of Covid "ravaged" the land. But where did this idea come from? Why, none other than Dr Fauci from the US!
He was grilled in the US House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic by Republicans. When asked about the six-foot rule, he said this: "You know, I don't recall. It sort of just appeared," and that he was not aware of any studies supporting it, and believed that it would have been difficult to perform such studies anyway. Nor did he recall any studies showing that masking would prevent Covid infection or transmission in children. But it took place across the West anyway.
The same situation existed in Australia, with no scientific justification for either of these policies. In fact, published research counted against both policies, as infected droplets easily travelled further than six feet, and the masks were inadequate to prevent infection and transmission, and because of contamination, not being regularly replaced, and were likely to concentrate viruses, acting as a collection device. Yet all of this was pushed by the authorities.
It was not scientific medicine, but policies of social control and obedience training, like with dogs. And our academics and doctors went along with it all. We must not forget this, as we will see it with the next plandemic, which is being cooked up now.
"Bombshell testimony from Dr. Anthony Fauci earlier this year reveals he made up the six foot social distancing rule and other measures to 'protect' Americans from Covid. The Mail has helpfully compiled some highlights from that testimony ahead of further testimony from Fauci later today.
Kids' learning loss and social setbacks have been well documented, with one National Institutes of Health (NIH) study calling the impact of mask use on students' literacy and learning "very negative".
And the impacts from social distancing caused "depression, generalised anxiety, acute stress, and intrusive thoughts", another NIH study found.
Speaking to counsel on behalf of the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic earlier this year, Fauci told Republicans that the six foot social distancing rule "sort of just appeared" and that he did not recall how it came about.
"You know, I don't recall. It sort of just appeared," he said according to committee transcripts when pressed on how the rule came about.
He added he "was not aware of studies" that supported the social distancing, conceding that such studies "would be very difficult" to do.
In addition to not recalling any evidence supporting social distancing, Fauci also told the committee's counsel that he didn't remember reading anything to support that masking kids would prevent Covid.
"Do you recall reviewing any studies or data supporting masking for children?" he was asked.
"I might have," he responded, before adding "but I don't recall specifically that I did".
The pandemic patriarch also testified that he had not followed any studies after the fact regarding the impacts that forced mask wearing had on children, of which there have been many.
And his answer was an ironic Covid-esque pun, "I still think that's up in the air," Fauci said about whether masking kids was a solid way to prevent transmission.
Further, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) told the counsel that he believes the lab leak theory – the idea that COVID began at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) – is a real "possibility".
"I think people have made conspiracy aspects from it," he said, adding "it could be a lab leak".
"So I think that in and of itself isn't inherently a conspiracy theory, but some people spin off things from that that are kind of crazy."
His admission that COVID may have began at the WIV comes four years after he backed the publication of a paper which threw cold water on the lab leak theory called the 'Proximal Origin' paper."