Robert Hampton writing at Counter-Currents.com, discusses the meta-political significance of the Beijing Biden regime defining all of its conservative opponents as Nazis, as done by many crazy generals. Clearly, this is to dehumanise millions of the population, and set up what are now military thugs of a Leftist regime, the conditions to commit genocide if necessary for their commo masters, under the guise of the tired old Leftist rhetoric of anti-racism and human rights. Human rights? What about the jailed January 6 peaceful protesters who are being tortured, as even Putin has noted? The US is no longer in any position to lecture China of Russia about human rights, as the country slides down to the level of South Africa, and perhaps, beyond.
https://counter-currents.com/2021/07/even-the-military-sees-middle-americans-as-nazis/
“The Nazi canard is still alive and stronger than ever in the post-Trump era. Even since Donald Trump came down the escalator, his many enemies have cried that his movement is the modern-day NSDAP. Much of this owes to Americans’ only historical reference being World War II. The other factor is that there exists no greater evil to the contemporary westerner than the Nazis. Not even Satan can compare.
While most of the Nazi comparisons were relegated to excitable talking heads and Resistance Twitter accounts, a number of serious people bought into this idea and definitely declared Trump and his movement “fascist.”
One of those serious people is Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark Milley. According to a new book written by Washington Post reporters Carole Leonning and Philip Rucker, Milley said Trump “preached the gospel of the Führer” and saw his supporters protesting the election as “Brownshirts in the streets.” He argued the post-election situation as a “Reichstag moment” and believed Trump was stoking an insurrection. When discussing security plans to protect the Capitol from imaginary threats following January 6, he said this of Trump supporters: “These guys are Nazis, they’re boogaloo boys, they’re Proud Boys. These are the same people we fought in World War II.”
That’s quite a statement from our nation’s highest-ranking military officer. This is a man who helms the most powerful military in the world, and he relishes the thought of unleashing it upon American citizens. The MAGA-hat wearing boomers are Nazis in Milley’s eyes — and they deserve the same fate as the Krauts in World War II. This isn’t just some Resistance clickbaiter; this is someone with the power of life and death. Mark Milley talks to the president and can impact policy.
The president of the United States shares a similar view of Trump supporters, but he doesn’t call them Nazis. Rather, he sees them as Confederates. In a speech last week on voting rights, he argued Republican election reforms present “the most significant test of our democracy since the Civil War.” He even argued Trump supporters touring the Capitol without permission is worse than anything the Confederates ever did. “The Confederates, back then, never breached the Capitol as insurrectionists did on January the 6th,” he told reporters. “I’m not saying this to alarm you; I’m saying this because you should be alarmed.”
Biden seems awfully obsessed with Civil War allusions. In a June speech, he mocked gun owners for thinking they have what it takes to fight back against government tyranny. “If you wanted or if you think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons,” he joked. The implication is that Biden would consider the nuking his own people if they rebelled. What a lovely idea.
Public commentators are more eager than before to declare the Trump movement as fascism. The Atlantic’s David Frum, a neocon, asserted this claim just a day before Milley’s comments were revealed. He claims he previously argued against calling Trumpism the “f-word” because it lacked key essentials to fascism. Namely, the cult of violence and contempt for legality. But Frum now claims Trumpism embodies these two factors after January 6. “Trump’s no Hitler, obviously. But they share some ways of thinking. The past never repeats itself. But it offers warnings. It’s time to start using the F-word again, not to defame — but to diagnose,” he concludes.
This isn’t serious analysis. Whatever Trumpism is, it’s not fascism — even by the dubious standards Frum sets. One protest that got out of hand is hardly a cult of violence. Challenging the election through the courts does not display a contempt for legality. The election itself, with the new revelations from Arizona and Georgia, shows a greater contempt for legality than anything Trump has said. But legality, or more importantly the pretense of legality, is determined by those who wield power. Those people are not Trump supporters. The contempt for legality really just means disrespect for the elites, the people that Frum serves as a mouthpiece for. You have to listen to what Gen. Milley, the CIA, the FBI, and the DOJ tell you. Only a fascist would doubt their wisdom.
The military leadership’s hatred for the average Trump supporter should disabuse the Right of some of its adoration for men in uniforms. These generals would gladly order their troops to shoot you for being a “racist.” They have no loyalty for the American people or its heritage. Milley supported the elimination of Confederate honors from military bases and vociferously defends Critical Race Theory. On the latter point, he says the military needs to learn it to understand “white rage.” Their primary loyalty is to the Empire of Nothing. It pays them well and offers them high status for subservience. They recognize no America outside of it. America is just an idea that mandates racial equity and gay pride parades. That’s the America Milley and the generals salute.
As an epithet, Nazi is grossly overused in our present age. But unlike other tired smears, it still carries meaning. Being called a Nazi marks you as a state enemy and the worst villain in society. The state feels justified in using violence against you if they can claim they fought against your kind in World War II. That’s all it takes.
The use of the phrase fascist or Nazi carries a more sinister meaning now. It no longer simply makes you a social pariah — it also casts you outside the body politic. Nazis are, apparently, an ever-present threat to the polis and they must be wiped out. In the past, Nazis would be granted a degree of peace in the country, no matter how extreme they were. … They were of course not liked by society, but military leaders didn’t summon the nation’s firepower against them. They were allowed to exist as a kooky fringe.
That’s changed. Every society needs its demons — Nazis are ours. Just as reformation-era villagers demanded witch burnings, dramatic action is called for against our devils. The globalists want everyone to believe that racists are the number one threat to our society. As long as people respect the uniform, they will at least listen to the uniform’s argument.
It’s not a joyous thought to be part of the most hated class in American society. But there is an upside. It’s not just limited to “racists” and “white nationalists.” The Nazi label encompasses the entire base of Trump supporters. It doesn’t matter how much you deplore racism or Hitler — the Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff says you’re a Nazi. There’s an opportunity here. Persecution breeds contempt for the system, and the more hateful the system gets, the more its targets begin to question what they’re told. They may begin to wonder what these “Nazis” they’re lumped in with actually believe. They may discover they’re not Nazis at all, but people with common sense observations and solutions to the world around them. They may even see them as true patriots.
The only thing the Dissident Right has to do is not to satisfy the system’s Nazi fantasy. Persecuted villagers didn’t proudly declare themselves possessed by the devil. We shouldn’t play to type either. There’s nothing Gen. Milley would like more than to mow down actual brownshirts.”
Here is what is being done to Trump supporters. While violent antifa and BLM urban terrorists are being let off, with no punishment at all, peaceful January protesters are getting slammed.
“A man who engaged in non-violent protest at the Capitol on January 6 was sentenced to eight months in prison this week for obstructing an official proceeding, while hundreds charged in violent riots last summer have seen their cases dropped.
Paul Allard Hodgkins, 38, of Tampa, Florida, was sentenced Monday after he pleaded guilty to a single felony count of obstructing an official proceeding, after he was identified in videos and photos inside the Senate chamber carrying a Trump 2020 flag.
While the count carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison, and prosecutors asked for 18 months, Hodgkins — who did not engage in any violence or property damage — received eight months, the longest punishment of three sentenced so far.
U.S. District Court Judge Randolph Moss told Hodgkins, “Although you were only one member of a larger mob, you actively participated in a larger event that threatened the Capitol and democracy itself.”
“The damage that was caused that way was way beyond a several-hour delay of the vote certification,” Moss added. “It is a damage that will persist in this country for several decades.”
Mona Sedky, an assistant U.S. attorney argued that imposing prison time “will send a loud and clear message to other would-be rioters that if and when they’re caught, they will face a serious sentence. So there won’t be a next time.”
Meanwhile, hundreds of people who were arrested in connection with riots last summer have seen their charges dismissed.According to a June 2021 analysis of New York Police Department data by NBC New York, there were 485 arrests in Manhattan, but 222 had their cases were dropped and 73 got lesser accounts. Another 40 cases involved juveniles and were sent to family court, and 128 cases remained open. In the Bronx, of 118 arrests made, 73 cases were dismissed, 18 cases remained open, and there were only 19 convictions on counts like trespassing that carried no jail time.
According to a September 2020 Associated Press report, there were already more than 300 arrests on federal crimes since George Floyd’s death – violent crimes including arson — for throwing Molotov cocktails, burning police cars, and injuring law enforcement. About one-third of the cases were for crimes in Portland, including assaulting a deputy U.S. marshal with a baseball bat, setting fires and setting off explosives at the federal courthouse and throwing rocks at officers.
Four rioters who took part in pro-BLM riots last summer did receive jail time, however, but for setting fire to the Minneapolis Police Department’s Third Precinct headquarters and causing $12 million in damages. A September 2020 report by Axios said there was an estimated $1 billion-plus in riot damage after Floyd’s death — the most expensive in history.
So far, two others have received sentences in connection with the January 6 Capitol riot — Anna Morgan-Lloyd of Bloomington, Indiana, 49, was sentenced to 36 months of probation after pleading guilty to one charge of demonstrating in a Capitol building; and Michael Curzio of Summerfield, Florida, plead guilty to the same charge and was sentenced to six months in prison, but since he had been in custody for that amount of time since his arrest, he served no additional jail time.”
“If there is a singular issue for the Biden administration, it is rooting out domestic terrorism purportedly perpetrated by right-wing extremists. Nonetheless, Biden nominated as Director of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) an unrepentant, honest-to-goodness, fear-inducing, caught-red-handed domestic terrorist—one Tracy Stone-Manning, who in 1989, engaged in eco-terrorism, which the FBI labeled as one of the nation’s primary domestic terrorism threats at the time. Despite indisputable evidence of her culpability in a federal felony, Biden continues to support her confirmation by the U.S. Senate.
President Biden should withdraw her nomination; failing that, the Senate must reject it.
In 1989, Tracy Stone-Manning was a graduate student at the University of Montana in Missoula. She joined Earth First!, a radical environmental group that proclaimed, “No compromise in defense of Mother Earth” and that engaged in “monkeywrenching,” which involved the sabotage of equipment used in logging, mining, construction, and livestock grazing. In fact, according to the federal official who investigated her, Stone-Manning “was not only a member of Earth First!, but she played an active role in Earth First! hierarchy” and “wielded significant influence among its members.”
Stone-Manning lived in a house filled with fellow Earth First! acolytes and edited its local newsletter, the Wild Rockies Review. In the late winter or early spring of 1989, one of her “roommates” and part of her “circle of friends,” John P. Blount, conspired with her to spike trees that were part of the Post Office Timber Sale in the Clearwater National Forest in nearby Idaho. She agreed to mail the warning letter to the U.S. Forest Service on Blount’s behalf. To be clear, driving metal spikes into these trees was both a federal crime and an act of eco-terrorism. It was intended to prevent the sale of timber by terrifying the loggers and millworkers who could be injured or even killed if their saws hit the metal spikes as they attempted to harvest the spiked trees.
Blount, who was convicted in 1993 of the tree spiking and sentenced to 17 months in prison, stated that Stone-Manning “knew about [the tree spiking plot] far in advance, a couple of months before we headed out.” In fact, he said Stone-Manning “agreed to mail the letter well in advance. She was supposed to mail the letter from Billings [Montana] where she had planned on going in two or three more days, so that it wasn’t postmarked ‘Missoula.’ That was the agreed-upon plan.”
Instead, Stone-Manning retyped the letter because, as she later explained, her “fingerprints were all over the original,” and she even rented a typewriter because she did not want the letter on her personal computer. Then she mailed it—from Missoula.
The U.S. Forest Service, on receipt of the letter, verified that indeed some 284 trees had been spiked with 340 “bridge construction-type spikes” in the Clearwater National Forest. Forest Service Special Agent Michael Merkley undertook an investigation, which led him and other federal authorities to the house where Stone-Manning and Blount resided. Seven of the house’s residents, including Stone-Manning, were served with subpoenas to appear before a grand jury and to provide hair and handwriting samples and fingerprints.
Stone-Manning refused to provide the required samples—that is, until threatened with arrest and prosecution. Her cooperation ended there. According to Merkley, in a letter he sent to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Stone-Manning refused to answer his questions; she also failed to testify truthfully to the grand jury of her knowledge and role in the tree spiking. Worse yet, she copped an attitude with the special agent. Merkley said, “Stone-Manning was extremely difficult to work with; in fact, she was the nastiest of the suspects. She was vulgar, antagonistic, and extremely anti-government.”
Despite her contemptuous behavior, Stone-Manning portrayed herself as the victim, telling an interviewer in 1990 that the investigation was “degrading. It changed my awareness of the power of government [to do] bad things sometimes.”
As a result of Stone-Manning’s failure to tell what she knew, the case was stalled in 1989. Assistant U.S. Attorney George Breitsameter would later write in a Pretrial Memorandum that by the end of 1989, “the criminal investigation did not develop any substantial evidence as to the identity of the individuals involved in the spiking.”
Three years later, Blount’s former girlfriend contacted federal authorities and reported that Blount had done the tree-spiking, and Stone-Manning had mailed the letter. Federal authorities then contacted Stone-Manning. She hired a lawyer, who obtained an immunity deal, and she testified that Blount had given her the letter to mail.
Thus, Stone-Manning, according to Blount and Merkley, was an accessory before the fact and, by her own admission, an accessory after the fact. Nonetheless, she refused to cooperate with federal law enforcement authorities in 1989, which delayed prosecution for four years. As a result, she may have aided and abetted the commission of a felony. Moreover, over the next 32 years, in various newspaper interviews, Stone-Manning lied about or otherwise misrepresented her role in the tree spiking crime in the Clearwater National Forest.
In 2013, she was similarly opaque or untruthful before the Montana State Senate after her nomination to lead the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. Finally, this year, as Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY) pointed out, she lied to the Senate when she declared that she had never been the subject of a federal investigation.
Before all her lies were exposed, Stone-Manning asserted that she did the right thing by mailing the letter as Blount requested. She did not do the right thing. The right thing would have been to contact the FBI or the U.S. Forest Service or the U.S. Attorney for Idaho. Now we know that her obligation to contact law enforcement began not when Blount handed her the letter–if, in fact, that event ever took place—but when Blount and the others began planning the tree spiking in February of 1989.
The BLM and its nearly 10,000 employees are responsible for 245 million acres of public land, 99.99 percent of which lies in the 11 western states and Alaska—10 percent of the country’s land mass—and for 700 million acres of mineral estate throughout the country. Some 65 million acres of that is managed for timber harvesting, a lawful activity with which Stone-Manning criminally interfered. Moreover, the BLM has 300 law enforcement rangers and special agents, like the Forest Service special agent whom she rebuffed, upbraided, and, who out of fear of Earth First!, including death threats against him and threats to harm his family, was forced into early retirement. Finally, some 155 million acres of BLM-managed land is devoted to livestock grazing, an economic activity Earth First! condemned and attacked with “acts of vandalism and violence.”
Westerners, the American public, and the dedicated public servants of the BLM deserve better.”
Instead, they have been given Biden and his cronies by the elites who stole the election, and conservatives, let it happen because resistance was beyond their paradigm. With a little foresight, Trump could have sacked pence and replaced him with General Flynn, who would have got the job done.