Sarah Game, once a One Nation MP in South Australia, has resigned from the party to sit as an independent, blaming the "way the One Nation brand is perceived" and declaring her intent to "advocate for all South Australians, regardless of their heritage or religious beliefs."
https://www.indailysa.com.au/news/just-in/2025/05/19/why-sarah-game-left-one-nation
This move, announced in May 2025, was inevitable. Game's maiden speech, championing immigration and cultural diversity, was a clear signal she was never truly aligned with One Nation's nationalist core. Her resignation confirms it: she's embraced her globalist path, joining the ranks of independents who prioritise multicultural ideology over sovereignty, housing concerns, and job security. Wish her well in this new chapter, but let's not ignore the logical and cultural implications. Her shift is a symptom of the same globalist agenda we here have railed against, e.g. the WHO's Pandemic Agreement, net zero's economic toll, and the UN's push for a borderless world. Australia's fight for identity and logic demands we resist such drift, not follow it.
Game's resignation was no surprise. Her maiden speech was an early declaration of war on One Nation's principles. She championed "sustainable cohesive immigration," ignored the housing and job crises exacerbated by mass immigration, and parroted multicultural platitudes that could've been lifted from a Labor or Greens manifesto. Pauline Hanson, who built One Nation on opposing mass Asian immigration and calling for border control, must have despaired. Game's voters, likely rural and regional South Australians, elected her to fight these very policies, not embrace them. The 2024 Ironfish study shows how migration drives up rental prices, a fact Game has ignored. Her claim that "immigration has enriched our culture and skill base" was a motherhood statement, blind to the cultural erosion Hanson warned against. It was only a matter of time before she shed One Nation's nationalist skin for the globalist suit, and her resignation in May 2025 confirms this.
Game's resignation, blaming One Nation's "brand perception," reveals her true colours:
She wants to "advocate for all South Australians, regardless of their heritage or religious beliefs," a noble-sounding goal that masks a globalist agenda. This is the same agenda we fear: the UN, EU, and Davos crowd pushing for a world where national identities are erased, diversity is uniformity, and sovereignty is sacrificed on the altar of integration. The WHO's Pandemic Agreement, with its digital ID mandates, and net zero policies, strangling Australia's economy, are part of this. Game's shift to independence aligns with this narrative, valuing a borderless, raceless ideal over the practical concerns of her constituents. She's joined the "mob," think Susan Ley's Liberals, Anthony Albanese's Labor, or the Greens, parties that bend to globalist winds. Wish her well, as I said, in this new chapter as an independent, but recognise it for what it is: a surrender to centralised control.
Game's move is not just politically inconsistent; it's logically flawed. She claims to support "sustainable cohesive immigration" while ignoring its unsustainable impacts on housing and jobs. The Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute's 2024 report confirms the strain on infrastructure, yet Game's speeches are silent on this. Her resignation, driven by One Nation's "brand perception," admits she was never a fit. One Nation stands for border control and cultural preservation; Game stands for a globalist vision like Labor and the Greens, where these are secondary to diversity. This is the WHO's logic, surrender to global mandates for the "greater good," regardless of local impact. Her inevitable path was to leave One Nation, not reform it. Logic demands we see this for what it is: a betrayal of nationalism, not a brave new stance. Her independence confirms this betrayal is complete.
Game's departure is a wake-up call for Australia's nationalist movement. Figures like Matt Canavan fight for sovereignty against net zero's globalist grip. Pauline Hanson's One Nation, despite its flaws, remains a bulwark against such erosion. Game's shift to independence, joining the globalist mob, underscores the need for a stronger nationalist response: reject the globalist script, defend identity, and preserve what makes a nation unique. Game's inevitable path is a reminder, don't follow her lead, even as an independent.
Logic, identity, and sovereignty demand it. Weyoung people are waking up, and hear us roar!
"In a further statement of policy and ideological separation from the party that installed her to the Legislative Council, Sarah Game – who last week declared herself at odds with a One Nation pledge to ban the teaching of foreign languages in schools – delivered her maiden speech late yesterday, championing immigration to Australia.
"My father is of Lithuanian and German heritage, born shortly after his parents immigrated to Australia," she told parliament.
"My paternal grandparents were immigrants. They came to Australia after the Second World War, because their countries of birth had had their democracies destroyed."
Game said: "I want to make clear that I support genuine refugee intake, and Australia's responsibility to help communities overseas in need."
"I support and acknowledge the benefit of sustainable cohesive immigration to Australia," she said.
"Immigration has enriched our culture and skill base."
One Nation founder Pauline Hanson forged her early reputation on outspoken rhetoric against Asian immigration "swamping" Australia, and her subsequent turn in the senate has been marked by calls for measures such as a ban on Muslim immigration, a Royal Commission into Islam, a Burqa ban and a motion that "it's ok to be white".
In a 2018 column for The Australian, Hanson wrote: "All I ask is that before we grant a permanent visa there should be a finding that the individual has a reasonable prospect of integrating socially and economically into Australia."
But Game told parliament yesterday: "I believe in people's right to maintain their culture and belief practices in Australia in a way that fosters a unified Australia, good relationships and respect between everybody."
"Despite immigrating here at 18, my 'oma' retained her thick Bavarian accent her whole life," she said.
"She brought with her wonderful culinary skills, and she maintained German traditions that enriched my childhood, particularly at Easter and Christmas."
Game said that "in terms of what I hope to achieve, I want to make clear that I make no distinction between Australians born overseas and Australians born here".
"I want to advocate for all South Australians," she said.
"I am passionate about equalising opportunity for everyone."
She spoke about her father working full-time while studying to become a dentist, saying: "I respect my father for his achievements and his support for my education, and his views have shaped my own – although my views have further developed with my own life experience, and unfortunately I do not share my father's views that anything can be achieved with a good work ethic and the right attitude."