Apart from the vaccine scams, Robert Kennedy Jr has expressed concerns about fluoride in the drinking water, which has made tap water like drinking out of a swimming pool. In fact, Kennedy has focussed his critique upon the use of fluorosilicic acid – "a highly toxic form of fluoride and [a] by-product of industrial fertilizer production." This chemical was added to the water to supposedly reduce tooth decay, even though use of a fluoride toothpaste, which is spat out and never swallowed, would do better.
U.S. Senior District Judge Edward M. Chen of the District Court for the Northern District of California, in his September 24, 2024 decision, accepted evidence that fluoride in the drinking water cold lower the IQ of children. Thus, his ruling ordered the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) to get rid of fluoride in drinking water, in compliance with the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976. Kennedy would be merely building upon that judgment. But he has been savagely attacked in the mainstream media for seeking to undermine the "greatest public health achievement of the 20th century."
There is obviously a bigger hidden agender here, and some speculation is that fluoride in the drinking water acts to keep the population relatively passive. It goes with the old saying that the elites get away with it because of "something in the drinking water." And it could be true.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-11-11-msm-smears-rfk-after-fluoride-ban-announcement.html
"The mainstream media (MSM) has published propaganda pieces smearing Robert F. Kennedy Jr. following his announcement that he would ban fluoride in drinking water under the administration of President-elect Donald Trump.
Thailand-based independent journalist Ben Bartee reported that Kennedy had confirmed the ban on fluoride from the water supply. In particular, the ban focuses on fluorosilicic acid – "a highly toxic form of fluoride and [a] byproduct of industrial fertilizer production."
"Corporate media and the vaunted 'experts' they rely on to issue their pseudoscientific decrees were none too pleased with [Kennedy's] plan to suspend the forced drugging of the American public with no informed consent whatsoever," Bartee continued. He then cited a piece from the Washington Post (WaPo), owned by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, which was critical of the former independent presidential candidate's proposal.
The WaPo piece started off by smearing Kennedy as an "anti-vaccine activist." It then claimed that his plan to remove the poisonous substance "puzzled many experts," warning that these same experts are worried about "the possible reversal of a decades-long practice that has been praised as one of the great public health achievements of the 20th century."
Water fluoridation began in 1945 in Michigan. Seventeen years later in 1962, the U.S. Public Health Service recommended adding small amounts of fluoride to drinking water to strengthen teeth and replace minerals lost to routine wear and tear.
This means that authorities have been poisoning Americans through the water supply for almost 80 years. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states that more than 200 million Americans are on fluoridated water systems.
Bartee continued: "So, given that fact, then the natural question arises. Why would these same entities expend so much effort and time in the information war to keep an industrial waste product in the water supply? Their insistence would suggest they see some great utility in the practice."
Federal judge rules that amount of fluoride in water impacts kids' IQ
According Bartee, fluoridated water impacts children's IQ – something a federal judge mentioned in his ruling that ordered the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to remove the chemical from the water supply.
U.S. Senior District Judge Edward M. Chen of the District Court for the Northern District of California pointed this out in his Sept. 24 decision. His ruling ordered the EPA to get rid of fluoride in drinking water, in compliance with the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976. Chen sided with the plaintiffs led by the Washington, D.C.-based Food & Water Watch.
The magistrate wrote in his decision: "The issue before this court is whether the plaintiffs have established by a preponderance of the evidence that the fluoridation of drinking water at levels typical in the U.S. poses an unreasonable risk of injury to the public. The court finds that fluoridation of water at 0.7 milligrams per liter – the level presently considered 'optimal' in the U.S. – poses an unreasonable risk of reduced IQ in children.
"It should be noted that this finding does not conclude with certainty that fluoridated water is injurious to public health. Rather, … this court finds there is an unreasonable risk of such injury, a risk sufficient to require the EPA to engage with a regulatory response.
"This order does not dictate precisely what the response must be. One thing the EPA cannot do, however, in the face of this court's finding, is to ignore that risk."