Recently Nature published this commentary:
“A faulty denominator also generated alarm in England when it misleadingly suggested that COVID-19 infections in 40–79-year-old residents were higher among vaccinated than unvaccinated people. The problem? An overestimated denominator led infections to be linked with an unrealistically large pool of unvaccinated people, depressing the apparent infection rate.”
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-02137-5
Professor Norman Fenton has responded to the nature article, arguing that the case is exactly the opposite. It is somewhat technical for his blog, but those interested should see Professor Fenton take them apart: