We at the Alor.org blog have been tirelessly promoting the point of view that mass immigration is harming, nay, destroying traditional Australia, both its people and culture. At the blog today the housing issue has featured, with reference made to the material of people other than ourselves saying basically the same thing. Nation First has now addressed this issue, and is in agreement that present mass immigration is dismantling the socio-cultural foundations of traditional Australia, and profoundly changing its values and ideals, such as owning one's one home, which has become an impossibility for most young people. In turn, this will lead to people not getting married and having children, and a further decline in population, which the political class and Big Business, will address by even more mass immigration, completing the cycle and making all problems even worse. The security issues are enormous, with the Chinese Communist Party infiltrating Australia, and even having an impact upon elections, as seen by the defeat of the previous Liberal government.
Imported ethnic tensions have arrived, which the government deals with by iron-fisted clamp-downs on free speech, which it was wanting to do anyway. Mass immigration, including the backdoor avenue through the hundreds of thousands of international students, who go on to seek residency, is part of the Asianisation program, that was championed by the likes of Paul Keating, and the Gillard Government's "Asian Century" White Paper, which aimed to make Australia into an Asian nation, by changing the demographics to have a people more suitable for Big Business, and who will put up with life in 50 story ghettos, living in sardine-tin size rooms.
CitizenGo has a survey on mass immigration at the link below. As George says, we need to get moving on dealing with this issue, as immigration mistakes are forever.
https://nationfirst.substack.com/p/australias-immigration-crisis
"In 2024, immigration rates in Australia shattered all previous records. Housing costs are spiraling out of control, infrastructure is collapsing, and once-thriving communities are being hollowed out. Reports from the conservative-leaning Australian newspaper to the left-leaning Sydney Morning Herald confirm this grim reality behind Australia's high immigration rate, but no one in power seems willing to question the status quo.
However, iconic entrepreneur Dick Smith was willing, and, in a major newspaper advertisement last month, he posed a question that should haunt every policymaker: "How many people can Australia give a good life to? 30 million? 100 million? A billion?" The answers don't exist because the system isn't built to sustain this level of strain.
But the damage from high immigration goes way beyond economics. Imported ethnic tensions have turned Australia's streets into arenas for foreign conflicts. Muslim and Jewish communities, drawn into protests inspired by Middle Eastern strife, are now clashing in cities across the nation. These are not Australia's battles, yet they are being fought on Australian soil. The rhetoric is escalating, the violence is real, and the societal fracture is growing. Why are we allowing this to happen?
… the mass migration blueprint is clear: flood nations with unsustainable immigration, spark cultural and societal breakdown, and watch as sovereignty crumbles.
And while the streets erupt, a quieter invasion is taking place. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has infiltrated Australian society in ways that would have been unthinkable just a decade ago. Surveillance systems tied to CCP-linked companies now operate in Australian cities. Political donations and covert influence campaigns are shaping policies in ways that undermine sovereignty. A 2018 book "Silent Invasion" by Professor Clive Hamilton laid bare the depth of CCP influence in Australia through a network of Chinese immigrants running the Australian branch of the espionage network United Front, yet the response from leaders has been feeble.
Away from the sinister to more foundational concerns is competition for available work. For all of Labor's bluff and bluster about protecting Australian workers, part of the reason for the current high immigration rate is that the Gillard Labor Government committed Australia to such with its Australia in the Asian Century White Paper. It did so by prioritising labour mobility, which is the ability of foreigners to compete for Australian jobs. The White Paper committed the government to: "Work to reduce unnecessary impediments in Australia's domestic regulations to cross-border business activity, investment and skilled-labour mobility, having regard to the arrangements in place in other countries in the region."
Even Australia's conservative parties seem to offer no reprieve. The Opposition Leader, Peter Dutton, was a strong voice against the immigration free-for-all, but has recently retreated from that sound position. Why? Reports have hinted at political pressure. Whatever the case we know that the establishment, including big business, and big banks are all strongly pro-immigration because it bolsters their own bottom line.
This is not just an Australian crisis. Look at Europe. Entire nations are being overwhelmed by waves of unchecked immigration. Their cultures, economies, and security are under attack. In the United States, the southern border is a sieve, allowing millions to enter with no regard for the rule of law or national identity. Mass immigration is a global agenda—a coordinated effort to dissolve national boundaries, undermine sovereignty, and create chaos.
As many Nation First readers know, I am the National Campaigns Director for CitizenGO Australia. I recently launched a survey for CitizenGO seeking views on immigration from those who still believe in a future for this nation—a future that prioritises its people, its values, and its survival.
I would encourage you to also fill in that survey.
While I want your honest views, for me, the mass migration blueprint is clear: flood nations with unsustainable immigration, spark cultural and societal breakdown, and watch as sovereignty crumbles.
The question is: what are we going to do about it?"