It was a crisp February morning in 2025 when the news broke, shattering the quiet hum of my routine life with a revelation that felt both inevitable and chilling. The headline from The Focal Points blared across my screen: "BREAKING: Insurance Data Reveals U.S. Mortality Crisis Persists—Mass COVID-19 'Vaccination' Likely to Blame":
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-insurance-data-reveals-us
As I sipped my coffee, which was going cold, the weight of those words settled in, pulling me into a story that unfolded like a slow-motion tragedy—one rooted in numbers, claims, and a growing unease that had been simmering beneath the surface for years.
The article began with a stark announcement: the United States was grappling with a persistent mortality crisis, one that refused to relent even as the world tried to move past the pandemic. Insurance data, that cold, unflinching mirror of societal health, was flashing red. Young people—those in the prime of life—were dying at alarming rates from cardiac issues, neurological disorders, and cancers. The numbers weren't just anomalies; they were a trend, a stubborn pattern that stretched back to the mass rollout of Covid-19 mRNA vaccines. I could almost hear the collective gasp of readers as the piece pointed a finger at the injections that had once been hailed as humanity's salvation.
Sun Life Financial, a major player in the insurance world, had sounded the alarm. Their U.S. operations reported a surge in "extremely expensive claims" in the fourth quarter, driving up the costs of stop-loss insurance benefits. It wasn't just a blip—something deeper was at play. The Insurance Collaboration to Save Lives, a nonprofit dedicated to dissecting life insurance claims, stepped into the fray with a grim assessment. Josh Stirling, the group's founder, didn't mince words: "Life expectancy has really flatlined and is worse now than it was a decade ago." I pictured him poring over spreadsheets, his brow furrowed as the data revealed a nation sliding backward.
Stirling's team had identified five troubling trends, though the article homed in on one that hit like a thunderclap: the spike in deaths among younger age groups. "It's really quite substantially elevated for younger ages," he said, his voice echoing through the text. "That's what jumped out at me." I imagined families across the country, unaware that their loved ones' stories were being tallied in these statistics—heart attacks striking athletes in their 20s, strokes felling parents in their 30s, cancers emerging with a ferocity that defied explanation.
The article didn't hesitate to connect the dots. With over 80 percent of Americans having received at least one dose of a Covid-19 mRNA vaccine, the authors argued that the correlation was too stark to ignore. They cited studies to back their claim. Alessandria and colleagues had found that vaccination reduced life expectancy by 37 percent and doubled the risk of all-cause death over a two-year follow-up. Rodrigues and Andrade echoed the sentiment, linking the shots to a doubled risk of post-Covid death in the long term. I felt a chill as I read those findings, wondering how many had dismissed them as fringe when they first emerged.
But the narrative didn't stop at correlation—it ventured into causation with a boldness that demanded attention. The largest vaccine safety study ever conducted, spanning 99 million vaccinated individuals, had uncovered a staggering 610 percent increased risk of myocarditis following mRNA injections. I could almost see the researchers hunched over their data, tracing the path from needle to heart, where inflammation smouldered silently until it erupted into tragedy. Another study, titled Risk Stratification for Future Cardiac Arrest after COVID-19 Vaccination, painted a vivid picture: subclinical myopericarditis, triggered by the vaccine, could spark deadly arrhythmias during exercise or even a morning jolt of adrenaline. The image of a young runner collapsing mid-stride haunted me.
The evidence piled up like debris after a Florida storm. In King County, Washington, a study of over 2 million people revealed a 1,236 percent surge in excess cardiac arrest deaths following the vaccination campaign. I paused, letting that number sink in. Twelve hundred percent. It was the kind of statistic that could silence a room, the kind that made you question everything you'd been told about safety and efficacy. The article framed it as a smoking gun, a data point too loud to be drowned out by reassurances from health authorities.
Stirling's voice returned, a thread of frustration weaving through his words. "Arguably we should be back to something close to normal," he said. But normal was a distant memory. The article suggested that cardiac and circulatory issues were key culprits, though Stirling hadn't explicitly tied them to the vaccines. The authors, however, had no such restraint. They pointed to the mRNA platform's known risks—myocarditis, pericarditis—and theorised that these conditions were setting off a cascade of sudden deaths, often masked as unexplained tragedies.
As I reached the end of the piece, the call to action was clear. The Focal Points urged readers to subscribe, to dive deeper into the "Courageous Discourse" that promised to unravel more of this unfolding crisis. I sat back, the coffee now cold in my hands, and felt the weight of a story that refused to be ignored. It was a tale of data and doubt, of lives cut short and questions left unanswered. One thing was certain: the insurance numbers were telling a story of loss—and someone, somewhere, would have to reckon with it.
There must be justice for the great vax scam, common decency demands it!