The US supreme court is presently hearing a case involving the constitutional validity of a law of Tennessee banning puberty blockers and hormone therapy for "transgender" identifying children. Biden's Black woman pick, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, made the "profound" observation that banning sex changes is like banning interracial marriage. Of course even conservatives now dare not challenge the supposed social desirability of interracial marriages, even given their many problems, that previous generation recognised, as well as leading Blacks such as Muhammad Ali, until he embraced Sufism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zq7rgl3VyLU.
But, running with this, the judgment is absurd since it is assuming that genital mutilation is morally and legally equivalent to states of marriage. That is a gulf that Justice Ketanji did not overcome. Once more not much law here beyond Left wing woke ideology.
"Biden's Supreme Court Justice pick, Ketanji Brown Jackson, the one who can't describe what a woman is, has argued that banning sex changes on children is akin to banning interracial marriages.
The Supreme Court is currently addressing a case concerning the constitutionality of a Tennessee law banning puberty blockers and hormone therapy for 'transgender' identifying children that was enacted last year.
Jackson confronted Tennessee Solicitor General Matt Rice, who was defending the law, by citing an old case regarding the state of Virginia banning interracial marriage. She then argued that somehow this can be compared to gender reassignment surgery on kids.
"The question was whether this was discriminatory because it applied to both races," Jackson said.
"But as I read the statute here, I mean the case here, it states that Virginia is one of the states that punishes marriages on the basis of race," she continued.
"When you look at the structure of that law…You can't do something that is inconsistent with your own characteristics; it looks like the same thing," she further declared.
"So, it's now interesting that we have this different argument, and I wonder if Virginia could have gotten away with what they did here by making a classification argument the way Tennessee is in this case," Jackson ridiculously posited."