On August 29, 2025, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, announced a convergence ofpeer-reviewed studies that provide compelling evidence for the immediate global withdrawal of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Published in Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law and the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, these studies, two released within the last 48 hours and one foundational paper from earlier this year, demonstrate that mRNA vaccines are unsafe, ineffective, contaminated, and in violation of international law. This discussion outlines the key findings, their implications, and the urgent need for action to halt these products, drawing on the studies' data and broader scientific context.
Key Findings from the Three Studies
1. Genomic Forensics and Bioweapons Concerns
The study by Zywiec et al. (2025) (discussed at the blog today), in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons reveals alarming evidence of laboratory manipulation in both SARS-CoV-2 and mRNA vaccines. Genomic forensics identified engineered features in the virus, including a furin cleavage site, HIV-like inserts, SEB superantigen motifs, ENaC epitope, and DC-SIGN receptors, matching elements proposed in DARPA's 2018 DEFUSE project. These findings suggest that both the virus and mRNA vaccines may violate the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). The study alleges a coordinated cover-up, citing Fauci and Farrar's February 1, 2020, teleconference to suppress discussion of these engineered elements, as evidenced by the "proximal origin" paper. NATO scientists rated SARS-CoV-2 as a highly attractive bioweapon, raising ethical concerns about the deployment of mRNA vaccines with similar genetic signatures.
2. Catastrophic Health Impacts
The studies document severe health harms associated with mRNA vaccines:
Cardiovascular Risks: Zywiec et al. report a 510% increased risk of myocarditis (99M cohort), 286% increase in heart attacks, 240% increase in strokes, and 199% increase in arrhythmias (85M cohort). Autopsies of 325 cases showed a high likelihood of vaccine-related death, primarily from cardiovascular damage.
Reproductive Harm: Pfizer's 2021 report and a NEJM reanalysis found an 81–82% miscarriage rate in early pregnancies, comparable to abortion drugs, with stillbirths and neonatal deaths several-fold higher than baseline.
Immune Dysfunction: Over 90% of vaccine-injured retirees showed reactivation of latent viruses (e.g., EBV, CMV, HHV-6), and 75% exhibited autoimmune markers, indicating immune collapse.
Cancer Surge: Aggressive tumours in digestive, brain, and breast tissues are linked to IgG4 tolerance, p53 disruption, DNA contamination, and mistranslation from modified nucleosides.
Military Impact: The Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) reported a 153% increase in myocarditis, 46% rise in digestive cancers, 262% increase in obesity, 867% surge in slip/trip/fall injuries, and 85% rise in suicidal/homicidal ideation, undermining military readiness.
Life Expectancy: Two-dose recipients lost 37% of expected lifespan in follow-up studies, a staggering public health concern.
3. Negative Efficacy and Excess Mortality
Hulscher et al. (2025) in Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law report that mRNA vaccines exhibit negative efficacy, increasing infection risk. Studies by Chemaitelly et al. show Pfizer and Moderna vaccines reaching negative effectiveness against Omicron subvariants after seven months (-17.8% and -20.4%, respectively). Shrestha et al. found a 253% higher infection risk in individuals with more than three doses, and Feldstein et al. reported that vaccinated children aged 6 months to 4 years were 159% more likely to contract COVID-19 and 257% more likely to develop symptomatic disease compared to unvaccinated peers. Excess mortality is higher in regions with high vaccination rates (U.S., Europe, Australia), with VAERS documenting 19,028 U.S. deaths, potentially 589,868 when adjusted for underreporting (multiplier of 31). Global estimates suggest up to 17 million vaccine-related deaths, far exceeding recall thresholds for past vaccines (e.g., 10 deaths for Cutter polio, 53 for swine flu).
4. DNA Contamination and Regulatory Failures
Ueda et al. (2025) in Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law highlight critical regulatory oversights in Japan, where 79.5% of the population (103.46 million) received mRNA vaccines without a nationwide safety investigation. The study notes:
Misclassification: mRNA shots were reviewed as vaccines, not gene therapies, bypassing stricter safety standards.
Skipped Safety Tests: No evaluations were conducted for biodistribution, organ-specific toxicity, carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, placental transfer, or foetal toxicity.
DNA Contamination: Independent labs detected plasmid DNA, including SV40 promoter sequences, in Pfizer and Moderna vials at levels up to 65,500% above regulatory thresholds, posing risks of genomic integration and oncogenesis.
Concealed Harms: Known risks like myocarditis, thrombosis, and pregnancy complications, were excluded from package inserts, violating physicians' duty to warn.
Suppressed Data: Japan's MHLW hid higher case fatality rates among the vaccinated, falsely claiming shots prevented severe disease. The FDA's failure to conduct DNA integration assessments, despite its own 2007 guidance, further underscores regulatory lapses.
5. Legal and Ethical Violations
The studies argue that mRNA vaccine programs violate international law, including the BWC and Japan's PMD Act, due to their engineered features and undisclosed risks. The absence of informed consent, suppression of mortality data, and approval of updated vaccines (e.g., Omicron XBB.1.5) without clinical trials breach ethical standards and constitutional rights to health and self-determination. Over 81,000 physicians, scientists, and citizens, 240 elected officials, and 17 professional organisations have called for withdrawal, citing a risk-benefit imbalance that violates the Hippocratic Oath.
Scientific Context and Supporting Evidence
These findings build on earlier research, such as a 2022 Current Issues in Molecular Biology study showing BNT162b2 mRNA reverse-transcription into DNA in human liver cells within six hours, mediated by LINE-1 retrotransposons. A 2023 hypothesis paper warned of insertional mutagenesis from activated LINE-1 elements, and posts on X from August 2025 report persistent mRNA and spike protein 3.2 years post-vaccination, indicating chronic harm. Neo7Bioscience's detection of a Pfizer BNT162b2 fragment integrated into chromosome 19 in a cancer patient's tumour confirms these risks, with plasmid DNA contamination as a key pathway for genomic corruption. Autopsy studies, including one by German pathologists, found 74% of 325 deaths directly linked to mRNA vaccines, primarily via cardiovascular damage.
Implications and Motives
The studies suggest that the mRNA vaccine rollout was driven by:
Rushed Development: The urgency of the COVID-19 pandemic led to bypassed safety protocols, as noted in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
Regulatory Leniency: Agencies like the FDA and Japan's PMDA overlooked critical tests to expedite approvals, possibly influenced by political and commercial pressures.
Big Pharma Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex: A coordinated effort between public health agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and regulators, as critiqued by Zywiec et al., obscured harms and inflated benefits.
The convergence of engineered viral and vaccine features with bioweapons potential raises questions about intent, though the studies stop short of claiming deliberate malice. Instead, they point to systemic failures amplified by liability shields and legislative inaction. On this point I disagree, but only so much can be said in academic papers.
The studies collectively demand:
Immediate Market Withdrawal: mRNA vaccines must be halted, as their harms far outweigh benefits, exceeding FDA Class I recall criteria by up to 375,340%.
Moratorium on saRNA Platforms: Self-amplifying mRNA (saRNA) vaccines, like Japan's ARCT-154/Kostaive, risk repeating these errors and must be stopped.
International Investigations: The BWC should probe the engineered features of SARS-CoV-2 and mRNA vaccines.
Enhanced Surveillance and Therapeutics: Platforms like Neo7Bioscience's Spike X Detect can identify and mitigate vaccine-related damage through personalised peptide therapies.
Accountability and Transparency: Independent inquiries must address regulatory failures and restore public trust.
The three peer-reviewed studies provide irrefutable evidence that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are unsafe, ineffective, and contaminated, with catastrophic health impacts across cardiovascular, reproductive, immune, and oncological systems. Their deployment violates ethical and legal standards, including the BWC and national health regulations. The call for immediate withdrawal, backed by over 81,000 experts and officials, is a scientific and moral imperative. As HHS begins winding down mRNA vaccine contracts under Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., society must adopt rigorous safety testing, transparent data, and ethical public health practices to prevent further harm and ensure accountability for this unprecedented crisis. And in many respects, the damage to the human race, has already been done.
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-three-peer-reviewed-studies