The ever-woke CNN published a piece following in the euphoria of the Left about declining white demographics from the latest census, expressing alarm that even with the declines of racial whites, “white supremacism” will not disappear. Why? Surely if the Great Replacement takes out whites, understood to be Nordics/Northern Europeans, and more broadly, Alpines and Mediterraneans, what is there left? No, according to CNN Enterprise writer John Blake, the evil white supremacists, will shift the goal posts, and add other ethno-racial groups to beef up the numbers. This fruit cake proposition got hammered even by the mainstream press. But really, whites do not lift a finger to deal with a stolen election, a Camp of the Saints border crisis, and those who are supposedly fighting for Western civilisation are often champions and celebrators of every ethno-racial group, such as East Asians, but never their own. We see this even on sites that on the face of it support Anglo-Saxons, but always with the qualification that one certain group is superior to it, but in other articles attack diversity. Useless; “deep” thought, maybe, but all bs at the end of the day. Then we have the universalists, only concerned with the human race, ensuring no effort to support their own, whether from the Left or the Right, aiming to build heaven on earth with supposed reforms that are really drives for power to them as a new class. It is known as white pathology, and unless this most grave of diseases can be overcome, the White West finally dies. With it will go civilisation with a Mad max world to follow in civilisation’s Wake.
“CNN faced scrutiny over the weekend after it published an analysis article claiming it was a "myth" that White supremacy would fade away as America became more diverse.
In the Saturday article, CNN Enterprise writer John Blake argued that "Whiteness" was elastic and that as the population became more diverse, as seen in the 2020 U.S. census report, White supremacy would adapt because being White could expand to incorporate new members, "if they have the right look."
"Don't ever underestimate White supremacy's ability to adapt. The assumption that more racial diversity equals more racial equality is a dangerous myth. Racial diversity can function as a cloaking device, concealing the most powerful forms of White supremacy while giving the appearance of racial progress," Blake wrote.
"Racism will likely be just as entrenched in a browner America as it is now. It will still be White supremacy, with a tan," he added.
Blake later claimed that how "Whiteness" was defined throughout history was a prime example of how White supremacy can adapt, citing the eventual inclusion of Italians, Irish and Jewish people into the White race when, he said, they weren't initially considered to be "fully White."
He referred to a guest essay in The New York Times by political scientist Justin Gest saying, "The US has broadened its definition of White people throughout history enough to maintain power over Black, Asian and Latino people."
"Why do so many racial groups gravitate toward Whiteness?" Blake asked rhetorically.
"It's due to a racial hierarchy that places Whiter-looking people at the top and darker-skinned people at the bottom of the socio-economic ladder," he answered.
Blake predicted that Latinos could be "the future of Whiteness," claiming that some had already begun to mark "White" on their census forms and that the temptation to identify as White could be "too tempting for many to ignore."