We need to be constantly examining overseas trends to see what new horrors will be washing onto our shores, since all of the things concerning us, were tried out on populations in other countries. Testing, one, two, three.
A French academic has said that France has divided into two societies and that this division needs to be seriously recognised:
http://www.westmonster.com/french-academic-create-a-muslim-state-within-france-to-avoid-civil-war/
“Professor Christian de Moliner claims that a second society has formed in France, which he described as: “A branch that wants to settle their lives on religious values and is fundamentally opposed to the liberal consensus on which our country was founded.
“We can never convert the 30% of Muslims who demand the introduction of sharia law to the merits of our democracy and secularism.
“We are now allowing segregation to take place that does not say its name. Rather than veil the face or adopt unimaginable measures in democracy (remigration, forced evictions of the most radical), why not establish a dual system of law in France?”
De Moliner writes that Emmanuel Macron winning the Presidential election will not make the problems disappear, it will only kick the can down the road.
“We will never be able to eradicate the radical Islamism,” he says, adding: “While we are not yet at open war, the faithful of the Prophet are already regrouping in areas sometimes governed by special rules.”
The academic’s ‘solution’ is to create a “state inspired by colonial Algeria and Mayotte of the twentieth century: one territory, one government, but two peoples: the French with the usual laws and Muslims with Qur’anic status (but only for those who choose it).
“The latter will have the right to vote unlike the natives of colonial Algeria, but they will apply Sharia in everyday life, to regulate matrimonial laws (which will legalize polygamy) and inheritance.”
“They will no longer apply to French judges for disputes between Muslims, but to Cadis. On the other hand, conflicts between Christians and believers will remain the responsibility of ordinary courts.”
“However, this system would involve schools or hospitals reserved for believers and therefore the creation of local committees that will manage them independently. A council of ulemas will fix the religious law, but the autonomy will stop there.”
The problem is that the autonomy will not stop there and will devolve into another country, a Muslim country in the heart of Western Europe, hopefully without nuclear weapons. The idea that this will avoid civil war is somewhat naïve, since it will only replace the civil war problem with a more conventional state vs state war.
At present, there is concern in some quarters about a war between two Muslim countries, Saudi Arabia and Iran, which could send world oil prices to US $ 300 a barrel and bring on another global economic crisis, or Great Depression 2.0:
https://www.rt.com/business/409905-saudi-arabia-iran-war-oil/
If war between Muslim countries is possible, and indeed, it has already occurred, in the case of the Iran-Iraq War 1980-1988, then it is hard to see how European war could be avoided.
Diversity destroys civilisation:
http://www.amerika.org/science/science-confirms-it-diversity-destroys-civilization/