If you accept the hypothesis of the evolution of humans from other primates, which many Christians do not, the African Eve hypothesis is one's likely choice of human origins. Charles Darwin proposed this idea in 1871, but he had an implicit racial bias and saw a hierarchy of humans, so people coming from Africa fitted his scheme. In the era of woke, the idea was turned on its head, seeing Darwin as a Victorian racist, so the "out of Africa" ideas came to be a metaphor as Africa as the mother of us all.
This present day woke position is not without criticism. Fossil finds since 1990 from northern Greece, have documented that the ancestors of humans evolved in South-eastern Europe instead of Africa. Then, apparently the migration to Africa occurred, and then another migration back, as humans. And so it goes on. It is all highly speculative, and at the end of her day is a highly uncertain part of science, if it can be called that. I sometimes view such archaeology as the modern equivalent of the examination of chicken entrails to determine the future, only this is the past being guessed at. Still, the subject has ideological importance in the battle of woke.
"A recent analysis of fossils recovered in the 1990s in the village of Nikiti in northern Greece supports the controversial idea that apes, the ancestors of humans, evolved in Southeastern Europe instead of Africa.
The 8 or 9-million-year-old fossils had first been linked to the extinct ape called Ouranopithecus.
However, a team led by David Begun from the University of Toronto's Department of Anthropology has recently analyzed the remains and determined that they likely belonged to a male animal from a potentially new species.
By inspecting the upper and lower jaw of the ancient European ape, the team suggested that humanity's forebears may have evolved in Europe before migrating to Africa, potentially upending a scientific consensus that has stood since Darwin's day.
In 1871, Darwin proposed that all hominins, including both modern and extinct humans, descended from a group in Africa. This is the most widely accepted theory today.
On the other hand, Darwin also speculated that hominins could also have originated in Europe, where fossils of large apes had already been discovered. The new analysis supports this theory.
While Begun does not believe the ape in Greece was a hominin, he speculates that it could represent the group from which hominins directly evolved.
The research team led by Begun had determined in 2017 that a 7.2-million-year-old ape called Graecopithecus, which also lived in what is now Greece, could be a hominin.
In this case, the 8-million to 9-million-year-old Nikiti ape would have directly preceded the first hominin, Graecopithecus, before hominins migrated to Africa seven million years ago.
According to a report in the journal New Scientist, Begun foresees that this new concept will be rejected by many experts who believe in African hominin origins, but he hopes that the new scenario will at least be considered.
Begun points out that Southeastern Europe was once occupied by the ancestors of animals such as the giraffe and rhino. "It's widely agreed that this was the found fauna of most of what we see in Africa today," he told New Scientist. "If the antelopes and giraffes could get into Africa 7 million years ago, why not the apes?"
Not all anthropologists agree with Begun and his team's conclusions. As noted by New Scientist, the Nikiti ape may be completely unrelated to hominins. It may have evolved similar features independently, developing teeth to eat similar foods or chew similarly to early hominins."