Recent revelations have intensified scrutiny on Dr. Anthony Fauci, former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), regarding his actions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Newly released emails, highlighted by Sen. Rand Paul, appear to show Fauci instructing colleagues to delete communications, contradicting his 2024 congressional testimony where he denied obstructing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. This has sparked accusations of perjury and a broader conspiracy to obscure information related to COVID-19's origins and management. However, a pre-emptive pardon issued by President Joe Biden in January 2025 complicates the legal landscape, raising questions about accountability and the limits of executive clemency.
In April 2020, Fauci emailed his chief of staff, Greg Folkers, dismissing Sen. Paul's claims about New York's COVID-19 death rate as "full of sh*t" and instructing him to "delete this after you read it." This directive, sent from Fauci's official government email, directly contradicts his sworn testimony to Congress, where he stated he never engaged in efforts to obstruct FOIA requests or destroy records. Additionally, emails from Fauci's senior aide, David Morens, reveal a pattern of evading FOIA by using private email accounts and deleting communications. Morens referenced a "secret back channel" to Fauci, suggesting deliberate efforts to avoid transparency.
These actions, if proven, could constitute perjury, a federal offense carrying up to five years in prison, and potential violations of federal record-keeping laws. Sen. Paul, now chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, has called for Fauci to testify under oath, emphasising that these emails expose a "COVID coverup." The emails also tie into broader allegations about Fauci's role in shaping the Proximal Origins paper, which dismissed the lab-leak hypothesis despite private acknowledgments from co-authors that SARS-CoV-2's features appeared "engineered."
On January 20, 2025, in the final hours of his presidency, Joe Biden issued a pre-emptive pardon to Fauci, covering potential offenses from 2014 through 2025 related to his roles at NIAID, the White House Coronavirus Task Force, and as Biden's chief medical advisor. Fauci accepted the pardon, stating it alleviated the "immeasurable distress" caused by threats of politically motivated prosecution, while insisting he committed no crime. The pardon also extended to others, including Gen. Mark Milley and members of the January 6 committee, framed as a safeguard against "revenge" by the incoming Trump administration.
However, the pardon's legitimacy is under scrutiny. Reports indicate it was signed using an autopen by White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients, raising questions about its validity if Biden did not personally authorise it. President Donald Trump, upon taking office, declared such pardons "null and void," though the legal weight of this declaration remains untested. Courts have historically been reluctant to limit presidential pardon powers under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, suggesting Fauci may be shielded from criminal prosecution.
While the pardon may protect Fauci from federal criminal charges, it does not immunise him from congressional inquiries or contempt of Congress if he misrepresents facts in future testimony. Sen. Paul's ongoing investigation, supported by millions of data points, aims to subpoena Fauci, potentially exposing further details. Moreover, the pardon does not cover Fauci's aides, like Morens, who admitted to deleting emails and using private accounts to evade FOIA. This leaves open the possibility of accountability for others involved in the alleged coverup.
Public sentiment, as reflected on platforms like X, shows polarised reactions. Some view Fauci's actions as a betrayal of public trust, accusing him of orchestrating a coverup of COVID-19's origins. Others argue the pardon was a necessary defence against politically driven attacks, with Fauci himself denying wrongdoing, as he would. The controversy fuels broader debates about transparency, gain-of-function research, and the politicisation of science.
The newly released emails provide compelling evidence that Fauci engaged in efforts to obstruct FOIA requests, contradicting his congressional testimony and raising serious ethical and legal questions. While Biden's pre-emptive pardon may shield him from criminal prosecution, its questionable execution and limited scope leave room for congressional accountability and public scrutiny. Fauci may come unstuck, yet!
https://armageddonprose.substack.com/p/fauci-caught-dead-to-rights-in-anti