It is all happening, rather quickly now. Following the adventures of the Alt Right in America, the ever politically correct Left have ramped up the volume on the removal of all things relating to white European history, especially British in Australia. This led to the meek squeak from John Howard, “not to rip up our proud history,” because British symbols represent the origins of this country: The Australian, August 25, 2017, p. 4; http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/dont-rip-up-our-proud-history-says-john-howard/news-story/4fd1189c540b7cf77bf8c302547626f5.
Well John, you could have done something about this, but instead you increased the immigration of Asians by record numbers beginning a displacement of traditional Australians as argued here: https://www.bookdepository.com/Howard-Legacy-Peter-Wilkinson/9780980400809
Anyway, the Howard claim fails to consider that our opponents consider everything about Western civilisation to be evil (while they exist only by virtue of its technology), but regardless of the inconsistency, many of the Left are so filled with psychopathic hate that they would be happy to see the world destroyed, so long as they can see us perish. How do conservatives in their fine coats and ties, deal with “such reckless hate”?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6XicBBN1l4
Other members of the political class were writing their little hearts out in The Weekend Australian, August 26-27, 2017. It gives me a neck ache just reading their material. I found even the Geoffrey Blainey article tiresome, “Surely the Aboriginal contribution to early Australia deserves a monument?”
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/inquirer/australia-day-debate-reclaim-history-instead-of-distorting-it/news-story/ba2bd6c850c8d95b9bfef14306f8e516
Sorry, but it is not 1983 now and the battle is for Western survival, and history has moved on. The old conservativism of nice suits and ties is dated in the near apocalyptic world that we are fast moving into. This is a world where high-level executives are taking to the woods because they see the collapse of civilisation coming from the chaos that IT-generated unemployment will bring:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4761458/Ex-Facebook-exec-says-society-collapse-30-years.html
And, that is just from the IT challenge, let alone the cultural war. For example, we have Triggs essentially giving a multicult defence of sharia law:
“Professor Triggs’ likening of Sharia law, which secular Muslims reject, to Catholic canon law comes a month after controversial Muslim psychologist Hanan Dover made exactly the same argument. “Australia’s liberal democracy prides itself being accommodating to different codes of law for different groups: halacha law for Jews, canon law for Catholics, tribal law for the Aboriginal communities, Islamic law for Muslims,” Ms Dover said on Facebook in July. “These are where the double standards we have to face from politicians/media commentators and bigots.”…
Professor Triggs also said Sharia divorce courts should be allowed in Australia, under a system where a Muslim man can leave his wife by saying ‘I divorce you’ three times. “If it’s a matter of private law within the Muslim community and they want to manage their affairs in that way, and they believe in those rules, that’s reasonably acceptable,” she said.
Later, she told Daily Mail Australia that One Nation leader Pauline Hanson’s policy of banning the burqa could be unconstitutional and would be likely to fail in the High Court. “It could be. It’s going to be a matter for the High Court. Wearing an external representation of your religious faith is something that we respect in Australia,” she said.” http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/gillian-triggs-runs-moral-equivalence-line-between-canon-and-sharia-law/news-story/c5e11374b99fc415a34893e9b416a5a4.
The trendy multicult Left never come clean about the undeniable conflict between the liberal conception of women’s and homosexual rights and Islam. The contradictions are just ignored. The Muslim method of divorce quoted above does not apply to women, with the process being much more difficult: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divorce_in_Islam, so, how is that liberal and based on egalitarianism? Short answer, it is not, and the multcultists are incoherent.
Equating sharia and canon law is intellectually frightening stuff because Church canon law only applies to the running of the Catholic Church, whereas sharia law is intended to replace liberal culture as well as liberal democracy. This has been noted many times, but it seems the new class elite do not want to talk about it until the Islamisation of the West is fait accompli:
https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B06XC6ZWW3/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1503822140&sr=8-3&keywords=islam+threat.
Religious rights, that is, the rights of Christians will be further undermined by the anti-discrimination thrust that the same sex marriage push will bring, as was dramatically seen in Tasmania, with people supporting traditional marriage facing the prospect of simply being sued out of existence: The Australian, August 25, 2017, p. 8.
But, we have not seen anything yet, because this really is the endgame of the West. This is how history is going to end, if we do not begin to fight. Can you see it now? Each and every article says that things are getting worse. Perhaps it may take Christianity to be made essentially illegal, for many to see the problem that burns in our souls.