Here is why the science and technology dealing with climate change is vitally important. Even mainstream science has been cautious about geoengineering the climate, by measures such as putting various chemicals in the stratosphere to reflect back solar radiation. One fear is that if done on a large enough scale, this may alter monsoon patterns in South East Asia, leading to the death of millions by famine. And countries like India and Pakistan have nuclear weapons (unlike Australia).
However, an experiment to increase cloud cover has been conducted off a decommissioned aircraft carrier in the San Francisco Bay. Microscopic salt particles were sprayed into the atmosphere. To avoid public backlash, the experimenters kept quiet about it, until after it was done; clear deception. The report of this by Scientific America.com, extracted below, recognises that there are potential dangers with these experiments. Yet the scientists still go ahead with them.
There needs to be increase monitoring of what these scientists do, and laws to prosecute them for conducting potentially dangerous experiments.
The nation's first outdoor test to limit global warming by increasing cloud cover launched Tuesday from the deck of a decommissioned aircraft carrier in the San Francisco Bay.
The experiment, which organizers didn't widely announce to avoid public backlash, marks the acceleration of a contentious field of research known as solar radiation modification. The concept involves shooting substances such as aerosols into the sky to reflect sunlight away from the Earth.
The move led by researchers at the University of Washington has renewed questions about how to effectively and ethically study promising climate technologies that could also harm communities and ecosystems in unexpected ways. The experiment is spraying microscopic salt particles into the air, and the secrecy surrounding its timing caught even some experts off guard.
"Since this experiment was kept under wraps until the test started, we are eager to see how public engagement is being planned and who will be involved," said Shuchi Talati, the executive director of the Alliance for Just Deliberation on Solar Geoengineering, a nonprofit that seeks to include developing countries in decisions about solar modification, also known as geoengineering. She is not involved in the experiment and only learned about it after being contacted by a reporter.
"While it complies with all current regulatory requirements, there is a clear need to reexamine what a strong regulatory framework must look like in a world where [solar radiation modification] experimentation is happening," Talati added.
The Coastal Atmospheric Aerosol Research and Engagement, or CAARE, project is using specially built sprayers to shoot trillions of sea salt particles into the sky in an effort to increase the density — and reflective capacity — of marine clouds. The experiment is taking place, when conditions permit, atop the USS Hornet Sea, Air & Space Museum in Alameda, California, and will run through the end of May, according to a weather modification form the team filed with federal regulators.
The project comes as global heat continues to obliterate monthly and yearly temperature records and amid growing interest in solar radiation modification from Silicon Valley funders and some environmental groups. It also follows the termination of a Harvard University experiment last month that planned to inject reflective aerosols into the stratosphere near Sweden before it was canceled after encountering opposition from Indigenous groups.
Solar radiation modification is controversial because widespread use of technologies like marine cloud brightening could alter weather patterns in unclear ways and potentially limit the productivity of fisheries and farms. It also wouldn't address the main cause of climate change — the use of fossil fuels — and could lead to a catastrophic spike in global temperatures if major geoengineering activities were discontinued before greenhouse gases decrease to manageable levels.
Of course, I disagree with this conclusion, as geoengineering is a dangerous "solution" to what is not a problem at all, alleged global warming, which is shown in the recent film, Martin Durkin's Climate: The Movie.